Instrumental indices for upper limb function assessment in stroke patients: a validation study

[1]  J. Ushiba,et al.  Clinical usefulness and validity of robotic measures of reaching movement in hemiparetic stroke patients , 2015, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[2]  B. Wünsche,et al.  Assessment of movement quality in robot- assisted upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[3]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Facilitating myoelectric-control with transcranial direct current stimulation: a preliminary study in healthy humans , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  Ching-yi Wu,et al.  Arm and Trunk Movement Kinematics During Seated Reaching Within and Beyond Arm's Length in People With Stroke: A Validity Study , 2014, Physical Therapy.

[5]  S. Leonhardt,et al.  A survey on robotic devices for upper limb rehabilitation , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Hermano I Krebs,et al.  Robotic Measurement of Arm Movements After Stroke Establishes Biomarkers of Motor Recovery , 2014, Stroke.

[7]  C. Lang,et al.  Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[8]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Movement Kinematics During a Drinking Task Are Associated With the Activity Capacity Level After Stroke , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  Joanne M Wagner,et al.  An evaluation of the Wolf Motor Function Test in motor trials early after stroke. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[10]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Tracking Motor Improvement at the Subtask Level During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of Stroke Patients , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[11]  K. Mauritz,et al.  Development and Validation of the First Robotic Scale for the Clinical Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Impairments in Stroke Patients , 2011, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[12]  M. Levesley,et al.  Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. , 2011, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[13]  Li-ling Chuang,et al.  Randomized Trial of Distributed Constraint-Induced Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training for the Rehabilitation of Upper-Limb Motor Control and Function After Stroke , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[14]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Validity of Movement Pattern Kinematics as Measures of Arm Motor Impairment Poststroke , 2010, Stroke.

[15]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  A comparison of two validated tests for upper limb function after stroke: The Wolf Motor Function Test and the Action Research Arm Test. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[16]  Janice I. Glasgow,et al.  Assessment of Upper-Limb Sensorimotor Function of Subacute Stroke Patients Using Visually Guided Reaching , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  B. Volpe,et al.  Kinematic Robot-Based Evaluation Scales and Clinical Counterparts to Measure Upper Limb Motor Performance in Patients With Chronic Stroke , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[18]  M. Levin,et al.  What Do Motor “Recovery” and “Compensation” Mean in Patients Following Stroke? , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[19]  Denis Mottet,et al.  Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. , 2009, Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[21]  P. Dario,et al.  Assessing Mechanisms of Recovery During Robot-Aided Neurorehabilitation of the Upper Limb , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[22]  H Nazirah,et al.  THE APPLICATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH (ICF) BY WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION(WHO) IN REHABILITATION MEDICINE PRACTICE , 2007 .

[23]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  M. Levin,et al.  Task-Specific Training With Trunk Restraint on Arm Recovery in Stroke: Randomized Control Trial , 2006, Stroke.

[26]  Staci McKay,et al.  Constraint-induced movement therapy for recovery of upper-limb function following traumatic brain injury. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[27]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[28]  J. Gracies,et al.  Pathophysiology of spastic paresis. II: Emergence of muscle overactivity , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[29]  W. T. Thach,et al.  How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis? , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  N. Hogan,et al.  Movement Smoothness Changes during Stroke Recovery , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[32]  J. Eng,et al.  Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[33]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[34]  E. Taub,et al.  The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[35]  F. van Wijck,et al.  Assessing Motor Deficits in Neurological Rehabilitation: Patterns of Instrument Usage , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[36]  P. Pigeon,et al.  Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[37]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  S. Wolf,et al.  Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients , 1989, Experimental Neurology.

[40]  J. Guilford,et al.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education , 1943 .

[41]  A. Merlo,et al.  Upper limb evaluation with robotic exoskeleton. Normative values for indices of accuracy, speed and smoothness. , 2013, NeuroRehabilitation.

[42]  J. Fung,et al.  Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[43]  P. Bahr,et al.  Sampling: Theory and Applications , 2020, Applied and Numerical Harmonic Analysis.

[44]  恵子 紀国谷.  国際生活機能分類(International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF)にみた福祉・保健・医療の専門職協働における連携に関する貢献と課題 , 2007 .

[45]  G. Alon,et al.  Persons with C5 or C6 tetraplegia achieve selected functional gains using a neuroprosthesis. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  H. Kaiser,et al.  A Study Of A Measure Of Sampling Adequacy For Factor-Analytic Correlation Matrices. , 1977, Multivariate behavioral research.

[47]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[48]  W. Holtzman.  Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. , 1951 .