Selection-Integrated Optimization (SIO) Methodology for Optimal Design of Adaptive Systems

Many engineering systems are required to operate under changing operating conditions. A special class of systems called adaptive systems has been proposed in the literature to achieve high performance under changing environments. Adaptive systems acquire this powerful feature by allowing their design configurations to change with operating conditions. In the optimization of the adaptive systems, designers are often required to select (i) adaptive and (ii) nonadaptive (or fixed) design variables of the design configuration. Generally, the selection of these variables and the optimization of adaptive systems are performed sequentially, thus being a source of suboptimality. In this paper, we propose the Selection-Integrated Optimization (SIO) methodology, which integrates the two key processes: (1) the selection of the adaptive and fixed design variables and (2) the optimization of the adaptive system, thereby eliminating a significant source of suboptimality from adaptive system optimization problems. A major challenge to integrating these two key processes is the selection ofappropriate fixed and adaptive design variables, which is discrete in nature. We propose the Variable-Segregating Mapping-Function (VSMF), which overcomes this challenge by progressively approximating the discreteness in the design variable selection process. This simple yet effective approach allows the SIO methodology to integrate the selection and optimization processes and helps avoid one significant source of suboptimality from the optimization procedure. The SIO methodology finds its applications in a variety of other engineering fields, such as product family optimization. However, in this paper, we limit the scope of our discussion to adaptive system optimization. The effectiveness of the SIO methodology is demonstrated by designing a new air-conditioning system called Active Building Envelope (ABE) system.

[1]  Christoph Roser A flexible design methodology , 2000 .

[2]  Achille Messac,et al.  Economic Viability Assessment of Active Building Envelope Systems , 2005 .

[3]  Jayanth N. Kudva,et al.  Morphing aircraft concepts, classifications, and challenges , 2004, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[4]  Christian Haubelt,et al.  System design for flexibility , 2002, Proceedings 2002 Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition.

[5]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Effective Development of Flexible Systems in Multidisciplinary Optimization , 2004 .

[6]  A. Messac,et al.  Required Relationship Between Objective Function and Pareto Frontier Orders: Practical Implications , 2001 .

[7]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A genetic algorithm based method for product family design optimization , 2003 .

[8]  Richard J. Buist,et al.  Effect of heat sink design on thermoelectric cooling performance , 2008 .

[9]  Achille Messac,et al.  Control-Structure Integrated Design , 1992 .

[10]  Wei Chen,et al.  A Variation-Based Methodology for Product Family Design , 2000, Volume 2: 26th Design Automation Conference.

[11]  Achille Messac,et al.  An Optimization Based Methodology to Design Flexible Systems Subjected to Changing Operating Conditions , 2005, DAC 2005.

[12]  Olivier L. de Weck,et al.  Multidisciplinary Structural Truss Topology Optimization for Reconfigurability , 2004 .

[13]  Achille Messac,et al.  Design of thermoelectric heat pump unit for active building envelope systems , 2005 .

[14]  A. Webb A piston revolution [internal combustion engines] , 2002 .

[15]  T. Simpson,et al.  Conceptual design of a family of products through the use of the robust concept exploration method , 1996 .

[16]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  A procedure for robust design: Minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors , 1996 .

[17]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  THE COMPROMISE DECISION SUPPORT PROBLEM AND THE ADAPTIVE LINEAR PROGRAMMING ALGORITHM , 1998 .

[18]  A. Messac,et al.  The normalized normal constraint method for generating the Pareto frontier , 2003 .

[19]  D. Rowe CRC Handbook of Thermoelectrics , 1995 .

[20]  A. Galip Ulsoy,et al.  On the coupling between the plant and controller optimization problems , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference. (Cat. No.01CH37148).

[21]  Nalin Kulatilaka,et al.  Valuing the flexibility of flexible manufacturing systems , 1988 .

[22]  Joycelyn S. Harrison,et al.  Aircraft Morphing program , 1998, Smart Structures.

[23]  Matthew B. Parkinson,et al.  ROBUST TRUCK CABIN LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION USING ADVANCED DRIVER VARIANCE MODELS , 2005, DAC 2005.

[24]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Commonality indices for product family design: a detailed comparison , 2006 .

[25]  Javier P. Gonzalez-Zugasti,et al.  A Method for Architecting Product Platforms , 2000 .

[26]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Platform Selection Under Performance Bounds in Optimal Design of Product Families , 2005 .

[27]  J. A. Buzacott,et al.  Flexible manufacturing systems: a review of analytical models , 1986 .

[28]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming , 2000 .

[29]  Hui Li,et al.  An Approach for Product Line Design Selection under Uncertainty and Competition , 2002 .

[30]  L. Watson,et al.  Modern homotopy methods in optimization , 1989 .

[31]  Timothy W. Simpson,et al.  A Variation-Based Method for Product Family Design , 2002 .

[32]  S. Azarm,et al.  Multi-objective robust optimization using a sensitivity region concept , 2005 .

[33]  Farrokh Mistree,et al.  DECISION-BASED DESIGN - A CONTEMPORARY PARADIGM FOR SHIP DESIGN , 1990 .

[34]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  A Framework for Flexible Systems and Its Implementation in Multiattribute Decision Making , 2004 .