Pelvic lymph node dissection at robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Assessing utilization and nodal metastases within a statewide quality improvement consortium.

[1]  J. Montie,et al.  Grade Groups Provide Improved Predictions of Pathological and Early Oncologic Outcomes Compared with Gleason Score Risk Groups , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[2]  G. Bratslavsky,et al.  Is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary in patients with biopsy proven Gleason 6 prostate cancer? - analysis of the SEER database. , 2018, The Canadian journal of urology.

[3]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Adherence to pelvic lymph node dissection recommendations according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network pelvic lymph node dissection guideline and the D'Amico lymph node invasion risk stratification. , 2017, Urologic oncology.

[4]  Sinae Kim,et al.  Utilization of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Patients With Low‐Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Robot‐Assisted Radical Prostatectomy , 2017, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[5]  M. Menon,et al.  Rate and Extent of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in the US Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Radical Prostatectomy , 2017, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[6]  Vidit Sharma,et al.  Therapeutic Value of Standard Versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer , 2017, Current Urology Reports.

[7]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. , 2017, European urology.

[8]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. , 2017, European urology.

[9]  C. Kwak,et al.  Extended versus Standard Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Radical Prostatectomy on Oncological and Functional Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2017, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[10]  A. Haese*,et al.  Adherence of the indication to European Association of Urology guideline recommended pelvic lymph node dissection at a high-volume center: Differences between open and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. , 2015, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[11]  W. Lowrance,et al.  Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population Health. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[12]  C. Gross,et al.  Variation in pelvic lymph node dissection among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy by hospital characteristics and surgical approach: results from the National Cancer Database. , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[13]  H. G. van der Poel,et al.  Indication for and extension of pelvic lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: an analysis of five European institutions. , 2014, European urology.

[14]  B. Guillonneau,et al.  Indications for and anatomical extent of pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: practice patterns of uro-oncologists in North America. , 2013, Urologic oncology.

[15]  F. Montorsi,et al.  Pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: Adherence and accuracy of the recent guidelines , 2013, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[16]  A. Briganti,et al.  Head to head comparison of nomograms predicting probability of lymph node invasion of prostate cancer in patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection. , 2012, Urology.

[17]  Andrea Salonia,et al.  Complications and other surgical outcomes associated with extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with localized prostate cancer. , 2006, European urology.

[18]  B. Konety,et al.  Impact of extent of lymphadenectomy on survival after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. , 2006, Urology.

[19]  David C. Miller,et al.  Appropriateness Criteria for Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer , 2017, The Journal of urology.