OBJECTIVE
Subcapital fractures of the femoral neck are common in elderly persons who have osteoporosis. Occasionally, radiographs of the hip in these patients show a radiolucency in the superolateral, subcapital region of the femoral neck that mimics the features of a pathologic fracture. Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of this finding and the anatomic variations of fracture alignment that cause this appearance.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All subcapital nonpathologic hip fractures (n = 111) that occurred at our institution during a 5-year period were reviewed. Radiographs were available in 100 of these cases. Review of intraoperative biopsy specimens, available in 69 patients, revealed no evidence of neoplasm in any case. In the other patients, follow-up radiographs, clinical evaluation, and pathology reports were used to exclude neoplastic involvement. Preoperative radiographs were analyzed for the presence of findings suggesting a pathologic fracture. Fracture configuration was classified by using the Garden staging system. Cadaveric femurs (n = 6) were fractured and studied radiographically.
RESULTS
Seventeen (17%) of the 100 subcapital fractures had a radiographic appearance similar to that of a pathologic fracture. This finding occurred only with Garden stage III fractures (n = 7, 32% of Garden stage III fractures) or Garden stage IV fractures (n = 10, 24% of Garden stage IV fractures). Study of the cadaveric femoral specimens showed that the radiographic appearance simulating a pathologic fracture was primarily caused by external rotation of the distal fracture fragment and was accentuated by displacement between fracture fragments.
CONCLUSION
The radiographic appearance of subcapital fractures of the femoral neck unrelated to neoplasm is often similar to that of pathologic fractures. This appearance is caused primarily by rotation of the fracture fragments, and the finding is accentuated by displacement. Recognition of the appearance of subcapital hip fractures mimicking pathologic fractures and knowledge of the cause of this finding are important for prescribing appropriate treatment.
[1]
A. Taylor,et al.
The zickel nail in the treatment of metastatic bone disease in the upper end of the femur.
,
1992,
The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.
[2]
S. Furner,et al.
Musculoskeletal Conditions in the United States
,
1992
.
[3]
E. Chao,et al.
Metastatic Bone Disease: A Study of the Surgical Treatment of 166 Pathologic Humeral and Femoral Fractures
,
1990,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[4]
M. Makin.
Osteoporosis and proximal femoral fractures in the female elderly of Jerusalem.
,
1987,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[5]
D. Hosking,et al.
Osteomalacia and femoral neck fractures in the elderly patient.
,
1987,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[6]
R Barmada,et al.
The effect of adjunctive methylmethacrylate on failures of fixation and function in patients with intertrochanteric fractures and osteoporosis.
,
1985,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[7]
J. M. Aitken,et al.
Relevance of osteoporosis in women with fracture of the femoral neck
,
1984
.
[8]
A. Bayliss,et al.
Traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head following intracapsular fracture: incidence and earliest radiological features.
,
1977,
Clinical radiology.
[9]
R. S. Garden,et al.
Subcapital fractures of the femur. A prospective review.
,
1976,
The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[10]
R. Bryan,et al.
Femoral neck fractures in young adults.
,
1976,
Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[11]
G. Cs,et al.
Pathological fractures secondary to metastatic cancer.
,
1974
.
[12]
J. Trueta.
THE THREE TYPES OF ACUTE HAEMATOGENOUS OSTEOMYELITIS A Clinical and Vascular Study
,
1959
.