Factors in the Adoption of Third-Party B2B Portals in the Textile Industry

For this study. 121 Hong Kong garment manufacturing firms were surveyed on their adoption of a third-party B2B portal, which utilizes an Internet-based EDI technology using XML. Using path analysis, the impact of underlying factors such as CEO innovativeness and attitude toward IT. perceived external pressure, and perceived benefits and hindrances are studied. In particular, the effect of firm size on the adoption of the technology, which is our major contribution, is fully investigated in this study. Our findings, which are consistent with previous studies on adoption, indicate that perceived benefits, perceived hindrances. and perceived external pressure have a strong effect on the decision to adopt a third-party B2B portal. Firms that perceive more benefits, less hindrance, or greater external pressure to adopt a technology will be more likely to adopt that technology. Moreover, the size of a firm is an important factor. Larger manufacturers will perceive to have less external pressure, more hindrances, and fewer benefits to adoption than smaller ones. Among these three factors, firm size has large impact on both perceived external pressure and perceived hindrances and small impact on perceived benefits. In addition, the existence of some hidden factors such as existing market position and partner relationships would help to explain the direct effect of firm size. Larger manufacturers may be more unwilling to adopt a third-party B2B portal because of their unique market position and/or already connect with their clothing companies through intranet. These factors enable us to achieve a clear understanding of the adoption of a technological business solution for inter-organizational communications.

[1]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants of EDI adoption in the transportation industry , 1997 .

[2]  Hsiao‐Yen Mao,et al.  Moderating effect of firm size on the relationship between voluntary employer changes and salary attainment , 2002 .

[3]  Walter W.C. Chung,et al.  A framework to develop an enterprise information portal for contract manufacturing , 2002 .

[4]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Enhancing Survey Response Rates at the Executive Level: Are Employee- or Consumer-Level Techniques Effective? , 2002 .

[5]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Internet-Based Financial EDI: Towards a Theory of Its Organizational Adoption , 1998, Comput. Networks.

[6]  Chang Liu,et al.  Organizational Size: A Significant Predictor of it Innovation Adoption , 2002, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences , 1979 .

[8]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Electronic marketplaces in Hong Kong's trading industry , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[9]  Craig Smith The case study: a useful research method for information management , 1990, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Jaideep Motwani,et al.  Understanding Small Business Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Empirical Analysis , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Victor R. Prybutok,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Knowledge Management Technologies: A Discriminative Approach , 2001, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[12]  J. Thong,et al.  CEO characteristics, organizational characteristics and information technology adoption in small businesses , 1995 .

[13]  Eric van Heck,et al.  The adoption and impact of EDI in Dutch SMEs , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[14]  R. Hsiao,et al.  THE ADOPTION DIFFICULTY OF B2B E-COMMERCE IN ASIA , 2001 .

[15]  Vicky Manthou,et al.  EDI Implementation: The EDI Clusters Program in Greece , 2001 .

[16]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  e-Business and Supply Chain Integration , 2004 .

[18]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[19]  Mary C. Jones,et al.  Towards the development of measures of perceived benefits and compatibility of EDI: a comparative assessment of competing first order factor models , 1998 .

[20]  Hau L. Lee Ultimate Enterprise Value Creation Using Demand-Based Management , 2001 .

[21]  D. Towill,et al.  Information enrichment: designing the supply chain for competitive advantage , 1997 .

[22]  Sean R McDade,et al.  The organizational adoption of high-technology products “for use” , 2002 .

[23]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[24]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Discriminant Analysis of Technology Adoption Behavior: A Case of Internet Technologies in Small Businesses , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Ho Geun Lee,et al.  Research Report. Can EDI Benefit Adopters? , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  S. Ghoneim,et al.  Drivers and barriers to adopting EDI: a sector analysis of UK industry , 1996 .