THE COMPETITION LAW REVIEW

Harmonisation has always been at the forefront of European integration. To this express harmonisation one can now add what may be called spontaneous harmonisation. Spontaneous harmonisation can be described as the convergence of rules of the Member States following the example of comparable rules in the European Union without any express harmonising activity of that Union. This spontaneous harmonisation has taken place in the area of competition law. The European Community’s competition rules have functioned as an example for the competition rules of most Member States in that the latter have amended or adopted their national competition laws so they mirror the Community’s rules on competition.1 While a spontaneous harmonisation can already be observed with regard to the Community’s competition rules, the question is how this spontaneous harmonisation relates to the so-called modernisation of the Community’s competition rules.

[1]  B. Rodger The interface between competition law and private law: Article 81, illegality and unjustified enrichment , 2002 .

[2]  L. Priestley Transnational Civil Procedure - Fact Pleading v. Notice Pleading : its Significance in the Development of Evidence , 2001 .

[3]  Rolf Stürner Transnational Civil Procedure : Discovery and Sanctions Against Non-Compliance , 2001 .

[4]  J. Stempel Applying Amended Rule 26(B)(1) in Litigation: The New Scope of Discovery , 2001 .

[5]  J. Stempel Politics and Sociology in Federal Civil Rulemaking: Errors of Scope , 2001 .

[6]  Georgios I. Zekos Eco Swiss China Time Ltd v Benetton International NV , 2000, Journal of International Arbitration.

[7]  R. Marcus Discovery Containment Redux , 1999 .

[8]  Stephen N. Subrin Fishing expeditions allowed: the historical background of the 1938 Federal Discovery Rules , 1998 .

[9]  S. Johnson A square peg in a round hole. , 1998, Michigan health & hospitals.

[10]  A. Toffoletto Il risarcimento del danno nel sistema delle sanzioni per la violazione della normativa antitrust , 1996 .

[11]  Herbert Hovenkamp The Indirect-Purchaser Rule and Cost-Plus Sales , 1990 .

[12]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  The Economics of Passing On: A Reply to Harris and Sullivan , 1980 .

[13]  Robert G. Harris,et al.  Passing on the Monopoly Overcharge: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis , 1979 .

[14]  Richard A. Posner,et al.  Should Indirect Purchasers Have Standing to Sue under the Antitrust Laws? An Economic Analysis of the Rule of Illinois Brick , 1979 .

[15]  D. Berger,et al.  An Analytical Framework for Antitrust Standing , 1977 .

[16]  Rosario Nicolò Istituzioni di diritto privato , 1962 .