The Basic, the Solid, the Site-Specific and the Full or Total Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for Turkey

The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) has been calculated in various ways for various countries and for various time spans. Based on the degree of objectivity, the Basic, Solid, and Site-specific ISEW are separated, whose sum constitutes the Total or Full ISEW. The paper proposes some guidelines for countries and smaller forms of state organizations, to apply and re-state their sustainable GDP, thus rendering it a useful figure as reported vis-a-vis the long established GDP. To demonstrate this theoretical advancement, the Turkish economy is used for an application. Turkey is a dynamic emerging economy, given its rapid GDP increase over the past two decades and the population increase on the one hand. On the other hand, it is afflicted by social inequalities and environmental problems, which if they were to be abated, they would certainly deduct from the increased income achieved so far.

[1]  James G. McGann Turkey: An Overview , 2018, Think Tanks, Foreign Policy and the Emerging Powers.

[2]  H. Buch‐Hansen The Prerequisites for a Degrowth Paradigm Shift: Insights from Critical Political Economy , 2018 .

[3]  M. Germain Optimal Versus Sustainable Degrowth Policies , 2017 .

[4]  A. Menegaki,et al.  Energy consumption and Sustainable Economic Welfare in G7 countries; A comparison with the conventional nexus , 2017 .

[5]  A. Tiwari,et al.  The index of sustainable economic welfare in the energy-growth nexus for American countries , 2017 .

[6]  A. Menegaki,et al.  The sensitivity of growth, conservation, feedback & neutrality hypotheses to sustainability accounting , 2016 .

[7]  A. Menegaki,et al.  Rethinking the energy-growth nexus: Proposing an index of sustainable economic welfare for Sub-Saharan Africa , 2016 .

[8]  R. Costanza,et al.  Estimates of the Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) for Oregon from 1960–2010 and recommendations for a comprehensive shareholder's report , 2015 .

[9]  K. P. Tsagarakis,et al.  More indebted than we know? Informing fiscal policy with an index of sustainable welfare for Greece , 2015 .

[10]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  A review of limitations of GDP and alternative indices to monitor human wellbeing and to manage eco-system functionality , 2015 .

[11]  P. Beça,et al.  A comparison between GDP and ISEW in decoupling analysis , 2014 .

[12]  K. Bagstad,et al.  Methodological developments in US state-level Genuine Progress Indicators: Toward GPI 2.0 , 2014 .

[13]  Francesco Balducci,et al.  Going regional: An index of sustainable economic welfare for Italy , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[14]  A. Menegaki,et al.  Greece & Turkey; Assessment and Comparison of Their Renewable Energy Performance , 2013 .

[15]  A. Brennan A critique of the perceived solid conceptual foundations of ISEW & GPI — Irving Fisher's cognisance of human-health capital in ‘net psychic income’ , 2013 .

[16]  Enzo Tiezzi,et al.  Application and use of the ISEW for assessing the sustainability of a regional system: A case study in Italy , 2012 .

[17]  Harun Alp,et al.  The Role of Monetary Policy in Turkey during the Global Financial Crisis (Kuresel Kriz Doneminde Turkiye'de Para Politikasinin Rolu) , 2011 .

[18]  Harun Alp,et al.  The Role of Monetary Policy in Turkey During the Global Financial Crisis , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[19]  A. Menegaki Bourgas-Alexandroupolis oil pipeline; will matching institutional and regulatory contexts lead to an effective bargaining and eventual consensus? , 2011 .

[20]  Tim Jackson,et al.  Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet , 2011 .

[21]  M. Macovei Growth and economic crises in Turkey: leaving behind a turbulent past? , 2009 .

[22]  C. Lindgren,et al.  Turkey’s Renaissance: From Banking Crisis to Economic Revival , 2009 .

[23]  F. Toates The Environment and a Sustainable Future , 2009 .

[24]  R. Costanza,et al.  Beyond GDP: The Need for New Measures of Progress , 2009 .

[25]  Brent Bleys Proposed changes to the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare: An application to Belgium , 2008 .

[26]  A. Yeldan Turkey and the Long Decade with The IMF: 1998-2008 , 2008 .

[27]  Űmit Őzlale,et al.  Sources of Growth and the Output Gap for the Turkish Economy , 2006 .

[28]  Enzo Tiezzi,et al.  The Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) for a Local Authority: A Case Study in Italy , 2006 .

[29]  Philip Andrew Lawn,et al.  A theoretical foundation to support the Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI), and other related indexes , 2003 .

[30]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  On the Methodology of Isew, Gpi and Related Measures: Some Constructive Suggestions and Some Doubt on the 'Threshold' Hypothesis , 2000 .

[31]  T. B. Levent The Problems of Environment, Development and Planning in Turkey , 1999 .