Case Study of Water-related Efficiency and Productivity Analysis

In business model analyzing, the sustainable growth can be led through innovation only when an analysis is made in consideration not only of the existing economic and management aspects but also of the social and environmental aspects together. Therefore, Triple Layered Business Model Canvas theory which suggests three aspects of economy, society and environment can be analyzed was examined. Moreover, an integrally linked analysis by applying this theory in a messenger service in Korea was conducted as case study. Through this, opportunities for new business innovation can be identified. We hope our research could contribute to studies on business model innovation as well as corporate sustainability in the future.

[1]  B. Goldfarb,et al.  Genetic Variation in Water-Use Efficiency (WUE) and Growth in Mature Longleaf Pine , 2018, Forests.

[2]  Weixin Yang,et al.  Analysis of Total Factor Efficiency of Water Resource and Energy in China: A Study Based on DEA-SBM Model , 2017 .

[3]  Minghao Bai,et al.  Water Use Efficiency Improvement against a Backdrop of Expanding City Agglomeration in Developing Countries—A Case Study on Industrial and Agricultural Water Use in the Bohai Bay Region of China , 2017 .

[4]  Daniel P. Loucks,et al.  Water management: Current and future challenges and research directions , 2015 .

[5]  M. Molinos-Senante,et al.  Benchmarking the efficiency of the Chilean water and sewerage companies: a double-bootstrap approach , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[6]  Chongfeng Ren,et al.  Two-Stage DEA Analysis of Water Resource Use Efficiency , 2016 .

[7]  A. Datta,et al.  Improving water use efficiency, nitrogen use efficiency, and radiation use efficiency in field crops under drought stress: A review , 2019, Advances in Agronomy.

[8]  N. Salvati,et al.  Governance, strategy and efficiency of water utilities: the Italian case , 2018 .

[9]  Zhe Zhao,et al.  Land eco-efficiency for new-type urbanization in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region , 2018, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  Warren Brettenny,et al.  Efficiency evaluation of urban and rural municipal water service authorities in South Africa: A data envelopment analysis approach , 2016 .

[11]  Xiangzheng Deng,et al.  Exploring the relationship between urbanization and urban eco-efficiency: Evidence from prefecture-level cities in China , 2017, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[12]  Trung-Thanh Nguyen,et al.  Eco-efficiency analysis of sustainability-certified coffee production in Vietnam , 2018 .

[13]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Eco-efficiency of cotton-cropping systems in Pakistan: an integrated approach of life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[14]  Hossein Azadi,et al.  Impacts of technological change on energy use efficiency and GHG mitigation of pomegranate: Application of dynamic data envelopment analysis models , 2017 .

[15]  Hui Wang,et al.  Water Use Efficiency and Its Influencing Factors in China: Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)—Tobit Model , 2018, Water.

[16]  Decai Tang,et al.  Environmental regulation efficiency and total factor productivity—Effect analysis based on Chinese data from 2003 to 2013 , 2017 .

[17]  Liming Yao,et al.  Efficiency evaluation with feedback for regional water use and wastewater treatment , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[18]  Lin Lu,et al.  Eco-efficiency and its determinants at a tourism destination: A case study of Huangshan National Park, China , 2017 .

[19]  P. Hu,et al.  Efficiency Evaluation of Water Consumption in a Chinese Province-Level Region Based on Data Envelopment Analysis , 2018, Water.

[20]  Qunxiong Zhu,et al.  Energy and environment efficiency analysis based on an improved environment DEA cross-model: Case study of complex chemical processes , 2017 .

[21]  R. Snyder,et al.  Water Scarcity and Future Challenges for Food Production , 2015 .

[22]  Lin Yang,et al.  Assessing regional eco-efficiency from the perspective of resource, environmental and economic performance in China: A bootstrapping approach in global data envelopment analysis , 2018 .

[23]  Boqiang Lin,et al.  The shadow prices and demand elasticities of agricultural water in China: A StoNED-based analysis , 2017 .

[24]  Jianlin Wang,et al.  Better resource management: An improved resource and environmental efficiency evaluation approach that considers undesirable outputs , 2018 .

[25]  G. Thapa,et al.  Determinants and resource use efficiency of “better cotton”: An innovative cleaner production alternative , 2017 .

[26]  Brian P. Bledsoe,et al.  Benchmarking sustainability of urban water infrastructure systems in China , 2018 .

[27]  T. Baležentis,et al.  Measuring water use performance in the cities along China's South-North Water Transfer Project , 2018, Applied Geography.

[28]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Efficiency assessment of wastewater treatment plants: A data envelopment analysis approach integrating technical, economic, and environmental issues. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Caizhi Sun,et al.  Interprovincial two-stage water resource utilization efficiency under environmental constraint and spatial spillover effects in China , 2017 .

[30]  Q. Qiao,et al.  Study on eco-efficiency of industrial parks in China based on data envelopment analysis. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[31]  Chunshan Zhou,et al.  Estimation of eco-efficiency and its influencing factors in Guangdong province based on Super-SBM and panel regression models , 2018 .

[32]  Fan Zhang,et al.  The urbanization efficiency in Chengdu City: An estimation based on a three-stage DEA model , 2017 .

[33]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks , 2017 .

[34]  M. Khanali,et al.  Coupled life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis for mitigation of environmental impacts and enhancement of energy efficiency in grape production , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[35]  Guangyao Deng,et al.  Provincial water use efficiency measurement and factor analysis in China: Based on SBM-DEA model , 2016 .

[36]  Giovanni Zurlini,et al.  A non-parametric bootstrap-data envelopment analysis approach for environmental policy planning and management of agricultural efficiency in EU countries , 2017 .

[37]  Chi Zhou,et al.  DEA Game Cross-Efficiency Model to Urban Public Infrastructure Investment Comprehensive Efficiency of China , 2016 .

[38]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Efficiency of wastewater treatment facilities: The influence of scale economies. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[39]  Giulia Romano,et al.  Energy Efficiency Drivers in Wastewater Treatment Plants: A Double Bootstrap DEA Analysis , 2017 .

[40]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Benchmarking energy efficiency in drinking water treatment plants: Quantification of potential savings , 2018 .

[41]  William H. Alfonso Piña,et al.  Development and Urban Sustainability: An Analysis of Efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2016 .

[42]  Benjamin Lev,et al.  Assessing integrated water use and wastewater treatment systems in China: A mixed network structure two-stage SBM DEA model , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[43]  Corrado lo Storto Ecological Efficiency Based Ranking of Cities: A Combined DEA Cross-Efficiency and Shannon’s Entropy Method , 2016 .

[44]  Xiaoling Zhang,et al.  Measurement and decomposition of industrial green total factor water efficiency in China , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[45]  Shaojian Wang,et al.  China's municipal public infrastructure: Estimating construction levels and investment efficiency using the entropy method and a DEA model , 2017 .

[46]  Ian Vázquez-Rowe,et al.  Assessing Energy and Environmental Efficiency of the Spanish Agri-Food System Using the LCA/DEA Methodology , 2018, Energies.

[47]  M. Molinos-Senante,et al.  Accounting for service quality to customers in the efficiency of water companies: evidence from England and Wales , 2016 .

[48]  M. Molinos-Senante,et al.  Water utility efficiency assessment in Italy by accounting for service quality: An empirical investigation , 2017 .

[49]  S. Ratner,et al.  DEA-BASED DYNAMIC ASSESSMENT OF REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFICIENCY , 2017, Applied Computer Science.

[50]  J. Gordon,et al.  From the World Economic Forum , 2010 .

[51]  Y Yang,et al.  Exploring Northwest China's agricultural water-saving strategy: analysis of water use efficiency based on an SE-DEA model conducted in Xi'an, Shaanxi Province. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[52]  Ashkan Nabavi-Pelesaraei,et al.  Applying optimization techniques to improve of energy efficiency and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions of wheat production , 2016 .

[53]  Wei Liu,et al.  Eco-efficiency assessment of coal-fired combined heat and power plants in Chinese eco-industrial parks , 2017 .

[54]  T. Baležentis,et al.  Technical and environmental efficiency of livestock farms in China: A slacks-based DEA approach , 2020, China Economic Review.

[55]  H. Folmer,et al.  Interaction between output efficiency and environmental efficiency : evidence from the textile industry in Jiangsu Province, China , 2016 .

[56]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Evaluation of energy performance of drinking water treatment plants: Use of energy intensity and energy efficiency metrics , 2018, Applied Energy.

[57]  Jie Wu,et al.  Total-factor energy efficiency evaluation of Chinese industry by using two-stage DEA model with shared inputs , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[58]  Xiangzheng Deng,et al.  Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis of Agricultural Water Use Efficiency: A Case Study of the Heihe River Basin , 2018 .

[59]  Anicia Jaegler,et al.  Tracking carbon footprint in French vineyards: A DEA performance assessment , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[60]  A. Hoekstra,et al.  Four billion people facing severe water scarcity , 2016, Science Advances.

[61]  Israfil Roshdi,et al.  A multiplicative environmental DEA approach to measure efficiency changes in the world's major polluters ☆ , 2016 .

[62]  Sreejith Aravindakshan,et al.  Impact of informal groundwater markets on efficiency of irrigated farms in India: a bootstrap data envelopment analysis approach , 2015, Irrigation Science.

[63]  C. Vörösmarty,et al.  Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. , 2000, Science.

[64]  Murat Kucukvar,et al.  A fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework for dealing with uncertainty impacts of input–output life cycle assessment models on eco-efficiency assessment , 2016 .

[65]  Guijun Li,et al.  China’s Input-Output Efficiency of Water-Energy-Food Nexus Based on the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) Model , 2016 .

[66]  Hassan Ghasemi Mobtaker,et al.  A two-stage DEA model to evaluate sustainability and energy efficiency of tomato production , 2017 .

[67]  Jingzheng Ren,et al.  Evaluating efficiency of energy conservation measures in energy service companies in China , 2018, Energy Policy.

[68]  Estimation and Comparative Analysis of Environmental Efficiency in China, with and without Consideration of Haze , 2018 .

[69]  Gaiqiang Yang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Analyses of Water Resources Use Efficiency Based on Data Envelope Analysis and Malmquist Index: Case Study in Gansu Province, China , 2016 .

[70]  M. Molinos-Senante,et al.  Assessing the efficiency of Chilean water and sewerage companies accounting for uncertainty , 2016 .