Leaf habit and woodiness regulate different leaf economy traits at a given nutrient supply.

The large variation in the relationships between environmental factors and plant traits observed in natural communities exemplifies the alternative solutions that plants have developed in response to the same environmental limitations. Qualitative attributes, such as growth form, woodiness, and leaf habit can be used to approximate these alternative solutions. Here, we quantified the extent to which these attributes affect leaf trait values at a given resource supply level, using measured plant traits from 105 different species (254 observations) distributed across 50 sites in mesic to wet plant communities in The Netherlands. For each site, soil total N, soil total P, and water supply estimates were obtained by field measurements and modeling. Effects of growth forms, woodiness, and leaf habit on relations between leaf traits (SLA, specific leaf area; LNC, leaf nitrogen concentration; and LPC, leaf phosphorus concentration) vs. nutrient and water supply were quantified using maximum-likelihood methods and Bonferroni post hoc tests. The qualitative attributes explained 8-23% of the variance within sites in leaf traits vs. soil fertility relationships, and therefore they can potentially be used to make better predictions of global patterns of leaf traits in relation to nutrient supply. However, at a given soil fertility, the strength of the effect of each qualitative attribute was not the same for all leaf traits. These differences may imply a differential regulation of the leaf economy traits at a given nutrient supply, in which SLA and LPC seem to be regulated in accordance to changes in plant size and architecture while LNC seems to be primarily regulated at the leaf level by factors related to leaf longevity.

[1]  Peter M van Bodegom,et al.  Plant Strategies in Relation to Resource Supply in Mesic to Wet Environments: Does Theory Mirror Nature? , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[2]  L. Poorter,et al.  Causes and consequences of variation in leaf mass per area (LMA): a meta-analysis. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[3]  P. Reich,et al.  A global study of relationships between leaf traits, climate and soil measures of nutrient fertility , 2009 .

[4]  M. Westoby,et al.  A General Model for the Scaling of Offspring Size and Adult Size , 2008, The American Naturalist.

[5]  J. Dam,et al.  Advances of Modeling Water Flow in Variably Saturated Soils with SWAP , 2008 .

[6]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Predicting leaf physiology from simple plant and climate attributes: a global GLOPNET analysis. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  Peter B Reich,et al.  The scaling of leaf area and mass: the cost of light interception increases with leaf size , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Naoya Wada,et al.  Global negative vegetation feedback to climate warming responses of leaf litter decomposition rates in cold biomes. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[9]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Ecological Significance of Inherent Variation in Relative Growth Rate and Its Components , 2007 .

[10]  D. Ackerly,et al.  A trait-based approach to community assembly: partitioning of species trait values into within- and among-community components. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[11]  Sandra Lavorel,et al.  Plant functional types: are we getting any closer to the Holy Grail? , 2007 .

[12]  A. Pitman,et al.  Global patterns in seed size , 2006 .

[13]  Mark Westoby,et al.  Land-plant ecology on the basis of functional traits. , 2006, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[14]  M. Westoby,et al.  Seed size and plant strategy across the whole life cycle , 2006 .

[15]  P. Reich,et al.  Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. , 2006, Ecology.

[16]  E. Garnier,et al.  A structural equation model to integrate changes in functional strategies during old-field succession. , 2006, Ecology.

[17]  M. Westoby,et al.  Tradeoffs between height growth rate, stem persistence and maximum height among plant species in a post-fire succession , 2005 .

[18]  William G. Lee,et al.  Modulation of leaf economic traits and trait relationships by climate , 2005 .

[19]  J. Rodenburg,et al.  Effects of Ca- and Fe-rich Seepage on P Availability and Plant Performance in Calcareous Dune Soils , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[20]  Karl J. Niklas,et al.  Nitrogen/phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth , 2005 .

[21]  M. Vanclooster,et al.  A Set of Analytical Benchmarks to Test Numerical Models of Flow and Transport in Soils , 2005 .

[22]  S. Güsewell.  N : P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[23]  P. Reich,et al.  Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  J. P. Grime,et al.  The plant traits that drive ecosystems: Evidence from three continents , 2004 .

[25]  Sean C. Thomas,et al.  The worldwide leaf economics spectrum , 2004, Nature.

[26]  C. Körner,et al.  Leaf life spans in wild perennial herbaceous plants: a survey and attempts at a functional interpretation , 2004, Oecologia.

[27]  P. Coley,et al.  Effects of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defense , 2004, Oecologia.

[28]  P. Reich,et al.  A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide , 2003 .

[29]  M. Westoby,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STRATEGIES : Some Leading Dimensions of Variation Between Species , 2002 .

[30]  P. Reich.  Root–Shoot Relations: Optimality in Acclimation and Adaptation or the ‘‘Emperor’s New Clothes’’? , 2002 .

[31]  T. Givnish.  Adaptive significance of evergreen vs. deciduous leaves : solving the triple paradox , 2002 .

[32]  Eric Garnier,et al.  Consistency of species ranking based on functional leaf traits. , 2001, The New phytologist.

[33]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  A comparison of specific leaf area, chemical composition and leaf construction costs of field plants from 15 habitats differing in productivity , 1999 .

[34]  P. Reich,et al.  Measurement of leaf longevity of 14 species of grasses and forbs using a novel approach , 1999 .

[35]  David D. Ackerly,et al.  Significance of leaf longevity in plants , 1999 .

[36]  J. Bakker,et al.  Constraints in the restoration of ecological diversity in grassland and heathland communities. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[37]  F. S. Chapin,et al.  The Mineral Nutrition of Wild Plants Revisited: A Re-evaluation of Processes and Patterns , 1999 .

[38]  P. Reich,et al.  From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  M. Werger,et al.  Foliar nutrients in relation to growth, allocation and leaf traits in seedlings of a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1997, Oecologia.

[40]  Roderick Hunt,et al.  Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types , 1996 .

[41]  R. Aerts.  Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? , 1996 .

[42]  Thomas J. Givnish,et al.  Plant Stems: Biomechanical Adaptation for Energy Capture and Influence on Species Distributions , 1995 .

[43]  P. Reich,et al.  Leaf Life‐Span in Relation to Leaf, Plant, and Stand Characteristics among Diverse Ecosystems , 1992 .

[44]  J. P. Riley,et al.  A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters , 1962 .