Cultivating Capacity

Abstract Although community coalitions are an increasingly popular mechanism for attempting to change community-wide health, the empirical evidence has been mixed at best. Technical Assistance (TA) efforts have emerged in greater scale in hopes of improving both programming quality as well as the coalition structures supporting such programs. However, this commitment to TA interventions has outstripped our knowledge of optimal ways to deliver such assistance, and its limitations. This study takes advantage of results from a state-wide technical assistance project that generated longitudinal data on 41 health-oriented coalitions. The following questions were addressed: What are the circumstances under which coalitions will utilize available assistance? What are the effects of technical assistance on intermediate community outcomes? The results suggested that coalitions with greater initial “capacity” used more TA. Coalitions with low utilization mentioned difficulty in identifying their TA needs as the salient reason for not pursuing these resources. Over time, there were significant positive changes in coalition effectiveness as perceived by key informants, but these were not influenced by amount of TA.

[1]  L. Collins,et al.  Seven ways to increase power without increasing N. , 1994, NIDA research monograph.

[2]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  Fighting back against substance abuse: are community coalitions winning? , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  C. Merzel,et al.  Reconsidering community-based health promotion: promise, performance, and potential. , 2003, American journal of public health.

[4]  R A Winett,et al.  A framework for health promotion and disease prevention programs. , 1995, The American psychologist.

[5]  S. Schinke,et al.  Science-Based Prevention Programs and Principles, 2002. Effective Substance Abuse and Mental Health Programs for Every Community. , 2002 .

[6]  S. Fawcett,et al.  A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. , 2000, Annual review of public health.

[7]  Roger E Mitchell,et al.  Supporting Community-Based Prevention and Health Promotion Initiatives: Developing Effective Technical Assistance Systems , 2002, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[8]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: a developmental approach. , 1993, Health education research.

[9]  S. Kegeles,et al.  The role of technical assistance in the replication of effective HIV interventions. , 2000, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.

[10]  C. Collins,et al.  Evaluation and technical assistance for successful HIV program delivery. , 2000, AIDS Education and Prevention.

[11]  L. Saxe,et al.  Zero Effects in Substance Abuse Programs , 1998, Evaluation review.

[12]  Abraham Wandersman,et al.  Community interventions and effective prevention. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[13]  David Rindskopf,et al.  Think globally, act locally: Assessing the impact of community-based substance abuse prevention☆ , 1997 .

[14]  Scott P. Hays,et al.  Capacity for effectiveness: the relationship between coalition structure and community impact , 2000 .

[15]  J. Connell,et al.  New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Concepts, Methods, and Contexts. Roundtable on Comperhensive Community Initiatives for Children and Families. , 1995 .

[16]  C H Brown,et al.  Evaluating the evidence of effectiveness for preventive interventions: using a registry system to influence policy through science. , 2000, Addictive behaviors.

[17]  D Johnston,et al.  Implications of the results of community intervention trials. , 1998, Annual Review of Public Health.

[18]  L. Green,et al.  Fighting back or fighting themselves? Community coalitions against substance abuse and their use of best practices. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[19]  M. Kreuter,et al.  Evaluating Community-Based Collaborative Mechanisms: Implications for Practitioners , 2000 .

[20]  R M Goodman,et al.  Community Coalitions for Prevention and Health Promotion: Factors Predicting Satisfaction, Participation, and Planning , 1996, Health education quarterly.

[21]  Margret A. Dugan.  Participatory and Empowerment Evaluation: Lessons Learned in Training and Technical Assistance , 1996 .

[22]  Gary Uhl,et al.  Increasing evaluation capacity within community-based HIV prevention programs , 2002 .

[23]  R. Catalano,et al.  Mobilizing communities to reduce risks for drug abuse: Lessons on using research to guide prevention practice , 1992, Journal of Primary Prevention.

[24]  J. Stevenson,et al.  Building evaluation capacity in human service organizations: a case study , 2002 .

[25]  K. Wells,et al.  Community-Based Interventions , 2002, Mental health services research.

[26]  M. Kegler,et al.  A multiple case study of implementation in 10 local Project ASSIST coalitions in North Carolina. , 1998, Health education research.

[27]  Amy L. Anderson,et al.  The effects of training community leaders in prevention science: Communities That Care in Pennsylvania , 2002 .

[28]  T. Dishion,et al.  A multilevel approach to family-centered prevention in schools: process and outcome. , 2000, Addictive behaviors.

[29]  Rhonda K. Lewis,et al.  Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[30]  J. Schultz,et al.  Using Internet-Based Resources to Build Community Capacity: The Community Tool Box [http://ctb.ukans.edu/] , 2001, American journal of community psychology.

[31]  R. Mitchell,et al.  Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: a developmental perspective , 2000 .