Spatial and temporal jitter distort estimated functional properties of visual sensory neurons

The functional properties of neural sensory cells or small neural ensembles are often characterized by analyzing response-conditioned stimulus ensembles. Many widely used analytical methods, like receptive fields (RF), Wiener kernels or spatio-temporal receptive fields (STRF), rely on simple statistics of those ensembles. They also tend to rely on simple noise models for the residuals of the conditional ensembles. However, in many cases the response-conditioned stimulus set has more complex structure. If not taken explicitly into account, it can bias the estimates of many simple statistics, and lead to erroneous conclusions about the functionality of a neural sensory system. In this article, we consider sensory noise in the visual system generated by small stimulus shifts in two dimensions (2 spatial or 1-space 1-time jitter). We model this noise as the action of a set of translations onto the stimulus that leave the response invariant. The analysis demonstrates that the spike-triggered average is a biased estimator of the model mean, and provides a de-biasing method. We apply this approach to observations from the stimulus/response characteristics of cells in the cat visual cortex and provide improved estimates of the structure of visual receptive fields. In several cases the new estimates differ substantially from the classic receptive fields, to a degree that may require re-evaluation of the functional description of the associated cells.

[1]  William Bialek,et al.  Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code , 1996 .

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered neural characterization. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[3]  Tomás Gedeon,et al.  Effects of stimulus transformations on estimates of sensory neuron selectivity , 2006, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[4]  Albert A. Michelson,et al.  Studies in Optics , 1995 .

[5]  Thane Fremouw,et al.  Methods for the Analysis of Auditory Processing in the Brain , 2004, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  23 problems in systems neuroscience , 2006 .

[7]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  Tomás Gedeon,et al.  Dejittered Spike-Conditioned Stimulus Waveforms Yield Improved Estimates of Neuronal Feature Selectivity and Spike-Timing Precision of Sensory Interneurons , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. A. Orban,et al.  Receptive field properties of neurones in visual area 1 and visual area 2 in the baboon , 1985, Neuroscience.

[10]  Dario L Ringach,et al.  Dynamics of receptive field size in primary visual cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  D. Ringach Spatial structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive fields in macaque primary visual cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  A. Aertsen,et al.  Prediction of the responses of auditory neurons in the midbrain of the grass frog based on the spectro-temporal receptive field , 1983, Hearing Research.

[13]  H. L. Bryant,et al.  Spike initiation by transmembrane current: a white‐noise analysis. , 1976, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  The new cognitive neurosciences , 2000 .

[15]  Moshe Gur,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi003 Orientation and Direction Selectivity of Neurons in V1 of Alert Monkeys: Functional Relationships and Laminar Distributions , 2022 .

[16]  R. Reid,et al.  Specificity of monosynaptic connections from thalamus to visual cortex , 1995, Nature.

[17]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Receptive fields and functional architecture of macaque V2. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  P. H. Schiller,et al.  Spatial frequency and orientation tuning dynamics in area V1 , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Learning Lie Groups for Invariant Visual Perception , 1998, NIPS.

[20]  I. Ohzawa,et al.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Pau-Choo Chung,et al.  A new method for adjusting neural response jitter in the STRF obtained by spike-trigger averaging. , 2005, Bio Systems.

[22]  T. Gollisch Estimating receptive fields in the presence of spike-time jitter , 2006, Network.

[23]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Dynamics of orientation tuning in macaque primary visual cortex , 1997, Nature.

[24]  David J. Field,et al.  What is the other 85% of V1 doing? , 2004 .

[25]  F. Mechler,et al.  Interspike Intervals, Receptive Fields, and Information Encoding in Primary Visual Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[26]  O. Prospero-Garcia,et al.  Reliability of Spike Timing in Neocortical Neurons , 1995 .

[27]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Spike-triggered characterization of excitatory and suppressive stimulus dimensions in monkey V1 , 2004, Neurocomputing.

[28]  Markus Meister,et al.  Multi-neuronal signals from the retina: acquisition and analysis , 1994, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[29]  R. Shapley,et al.  Orientation Selectivity in Macaque V1: Diversity and Laminar Dependence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  A. Gilchrist Lightness, brightness, and transparency , 2009 .

[31]  Jonathan W Peirce,et al.  Residual eye-movements in macaque and their effects on visual responses of neurons , 2002, Visual Neuroscience.

[32]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  To appear in: The New Cognitive Neurosciences, 3rd edition Editor: M. Gazzaniga. MIT Press, 2004. Characterization of Neural Responses with Stochastic Stimuli , 2022 .

[33]  D. Hubel,et al.  The function of bursts of spikes during visual fixation in the awake primate lateral geniculate nucleus and primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Hertz,et al.  Adjacent visual cortical complex cells share about 20% of their stimulus-related information. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  J. Hertz,et al.  Insensitivity of V1 complex cell responses to small shifts in the retinal image of complex patterns. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  R. Shanmugam Multivariate Analysis: Part 2: Classification, Covariance Structures and Repeated Measurements , 1998 .

[37]  P. Poon,et al.  Spectro-temporal receptive fields of midbrain auditory neurons in the rat obtained with frequency modulated stimulation , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[38]  C. Gray,et al.  Heterogeneity in local distributions of orientation-selective neurons in the cat primary visual cortex , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[39]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  B. Frey,et al.  Transformation-Invariant Clustering Using the EM Algorithm , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[41]  R. Shapley,et al.  The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: Linear receptive field properties , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[42]  C. Gray,et al.  Heterogeneity in the responses of adjacent neurons to natural stimuli in cat striate cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.