Failure to Collude in the Presence of Asymmetric Information

In this paper, we design the optimal contract when two agents can collude under asymmetric information. They have correlated types, produce complementary inputs and are protected by limited liability. Therefore, a joint manipulation of reports allows them to internalize informational and productive externalities. We show that by taking advantage of the transaction costs created by asymmetric information, even though they collude, the principal can achieve the outcome without collusion regardless of the sign and the degree of correlation. In particular, the principal can implement a non-monotonic quantity schedule in a collusion-proof way while this is impossible if collusion occurs under complete information.

[1]  Jean Tirole,et al.  The Politics of Government Decision-Making : a Theory of Regulatory Capture , 1991 .

[2]  D. Sappington Limited liability contracts between principal and agent , 1983 .

[3]  M. Dalton,et al.  Men Who Manage: Fusions of Feeling and Theory in Administration. , 1960 .

[4]  D. Graham,et al.  Collusive Bidder Behavior at Single-Object Second-Price and English Auctions , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[5]  J. Tirole Hierarchies and Bureaucracies: On the Role of Collusion in Organizations , 1986 .

[6]  J. Jansen Regulating Complementary Input Supply: Cost Correlation and Limited Liability , 1997 .

[7]  M. Crozier The Bureaucratic Phenomenon , 1964 .

[8]  Philippe Jehiel,et al.  Collusion in Auctions with Externalities , 1998 .

[9]  R. Hess Power in organizations. , 2003, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[10]  J. Laffont,et al.  Mechanism Design with Collusion and Correlation , 2000 .

[11]  David Martimort,et al.  Collusion under Asymmetric Information , 1997 .

[12]  Richard J. Gilbert,et al.  Regulating Complementary Products: A Comparative Institutional Analysis , 1995 .

[13]  Tracy R. Lewis,et al.  Information Management in Incentive Problems , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[14]  Andrew Postlewaite,et al.  Asymmetric Information Bargaining Problems with Many Agents , 1990 .

[15]  James D. Dana,et al.  The Organization and Scope of Agents: Regulating Multiproduct Industries , 1993 .

[16]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[17]  David P. Baron,et al.  Information, Control, and Organizational Structure , 1992 .

[18]  J. Robert Continuity In Auction Design , 1991 .

[19]  Jean-Charles Rochet,et al.  Multi-dimensional screening:: A user's guide , 1999 .

[20]  George J. Mailath,et al.  Collusion in second price auctions with heterogeneous bidders , 1991 .

[21]  Richard P. McLean,et al.  Optimal Selling Strategies under Uncertainty for a Discriminating Monopolist When Demands Are Interdependent , 1985 .

[22]  E. Maskin,et al.  A Differential Approach to Dominant Strategy Mechanisms , 1980 .