Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color

This study examined how 16 Black, Latina, and American Indian women science students reacted to their undergraduate science classes. I focused on the meanings they made of the common features of university science documented by Seymour and Hewitt (1997), including large, competitive, fast-paced classes, poor teaching, and an unsupportive culture. I also explored their responses to the values manifested in their science classes and laboratories. The research took place at a large, predominantly White research university; participants were recruited from a science enrichment program for high-achieving students. I interviewed the participants and attended science classes and laboratories with them. I analyzed the data using J. Spradley's semantic structural analysis method (1979, 1980) and validated it through triangulation and member-checking. The women in the study found three features of science classes particularly discouraging: the size of the lecture classes, asking and answering questions in class, and (in some cases) engaging in undergraduate research. They were negatively impacted by two cultural values: a narrow focus on decontextualized science and the construction of science as a gender-, ethnicity- and race-neutral meritocracy. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed91:805–821, 2007

[1]  G. Huang,et al.  Entry and Persistence of Women and Minorities in College Science and Engineering Education. , 2000 .

[2]  L. Sax Retaining Tomorrow's Scientists: Exploring the Factors That Keep Male and Female College Students Interested in Science Careers. , 1994 .

[3]  Maria M. Ferreira The Research Lab: A Chilly Place for Graduate Women. , 2002 .

[4]  Gail D. Heyman,et al.  GENDER AND ACHIEVEMENT-RELATED BELIEFS AMONG ENGINEERING STUDENTS , 2002 .

[5]  Jan Nespor,et al.  Knowledge In Motion : Space, Time And Curriculum In Undergraduate Physics And Management , 2014 .

[6]  Heidi B. Carlone,et al.  Understanding the Science Experiences of Successful Women of Color: Science Identity as an Analytic Lens. , 2007 .

[7]  P. Chinn Multiple worlds/mismatched meanings: Barriers to minority women engineers , 1999 .

[8]  Angela C. Johnson Policy Implications of Supporting Women of Color in the Sciences , 2006 .

[9]  Anna De Fina,et al.  The ethnographic interview , 2019, The Routledge Handbook of Linguistic Ethnography.

[10]  Barbara B. Lazarus,et al.  Journeys of Women in Science and Engineering: No Universal Constants , 1999 .

[11]  George Campbell,et al.  Access Denied: Race, Ethnicity, and the Scientific Enterprise. , 2000 .

[12]  H. Lips,et al.  Predicting University Women's Participation in Mathematics and Science: a Causal Model , 1995 .

[13]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[14]  Mary M. Atwater,et al.  Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution , 2005 .

[15]  E. Keller Reflections on Gender and Science , 1985 .

[16]  R. Oaxaca,et al.  Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering. A Life Sequence Analysis. , 1998 .

[17]  Susan Brown,et al.  Hispanic Students Majoring in Science or Engineering: What Happened in Their Educational Journeys?. , 2002 .

[18]  Anne-Marie Scholer,et al.  Issues of Gender and Personal Life for Women in Academic Biology. , 1998 .

[19]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[20]  Nancy R. Lawrence,et al.  Women's Science: Learning and Succeeding from the Margins , 1998 .

[21]  Uri Treisman Studying Students Studying Calculus: A Look at the Lives of Minority Mathematics Students in College. , 1992 .

[22]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[23]  J. Blickenstaff Women and science careers: leaky pipeline or gender filter? , 2005 .