High-Dimensional Pixel Entanglement: Efficient Generation and Certification

Photons offer the potential to carry large amounts of information in their spectral, spatial, and polarisation degrees of freedom. While state-of-the-art classical communication systems routinely aim to maximize this information-carrying capacity via wavelength and spatial-mode division multiplexing, quantum systems based on multi-mode entanglement usually suffer from low state quality, long measurement times, and limited encoding capacity. At the same time, entanglement certification methods often rely on assumptions that compromise security. Here we show the assumption-free certification of photonic high-dimensional entanglement in the transverse position-momentum degree-of-freedom with a record quality, measurement speed, and entanglement dimensionality. Using a tailored macro-pixel basis, precise spatial-mode measurements, and a modified entanglement witness, we demonstrate state fidelities of up to 94.4% in a 19-dimensional state-space, entanglement in up to 55 local dimensions, and an entanglement-of-formation of up to 4 ebits. Furthermore, we demonstrate the certification of 18-dimensional entanglement in a record 3.6 minutes, showing an improvement in measurement times of more than two orders of magnitude. Our results pave the way for noise-robust quantum networks that saturate the information-carrying capacity of single photons.

[1]  Robert Fickler,et al.  Overcoming Noise in Entanglement Distribution. , 2019 .

[2]  Emmanuel Zambrini Cruzeiro,et al.  Quantification of multidimensional entanglement stored in a crystal , 2016, 1609.05033.

[3]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Orbital angular momentum of photons and the entanglement of Laguerre–Gaussian modes , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[4]  V. Scarani,et al.  Device-independent security of quantum cryptography against collective attacks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[5]  Laura Mančinska,et al.  Multidimensional quantum entanglement with large-scale integrated optics , 2018, Science.

[6]  Armin Tavakoli,et al.  Mutually unbiased bases and symmetric informationally complete measurements in Bell experiments , 2019, Science Advances.

[7]  W. Wootters,et al.  Optimal state-determination by mutually unbiased measurements , 1989 .

[8]  Patrick J. Coles,et al.  Entropic uncertainty relations and their applications , 2015, 1511.04857.

[9]  Stanislav Straupe,et al.  Quantum state engineering with twisted photons via adaptive shaping of the pump beam , 2018, Physical Review A.

[10]  Roberto Morandotti,et al.  On-chip generation of high-dimensional entangled quantum states and their coherent control , 2017, Nature.

[11]  William K. Wootters,et al.  Entanglement of formation and concurrence , 2001, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[12]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Generation and confirmation of a (100 × 100)-dimensional entangled quantum system , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Guang-Can Guo,et al.  Coherent manipulation of a three-dimensional maximally entangled state , 2018, Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) V: Quantum Technologies.

[14]  Robert W Boyd,et al.  Efficient separation of the orbital angular momentum eigenstates of light , 2013, Nature Communications.

[15]  G. Buller,et al.  Imaging high-dimensional spatial entanglement with a camera , 2012, Nature Communications.

[16]  J. Leach,et al.  Are high-dimensional entangled states robust to noise? , 2019, 1908.08943.

[17]  Daniel J Gauthier,et al.  Provably secure and high-rate quantum key distribution with time-bin qudits , 2017, Science Advances.

[18]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Quantifying high dimensional entanglement with two mutually unbiased bases , 2015, 1512.05315.

[19]  R. Boyd,et al.  Pixel entanglement: experimental realization of optically entangled d=3 and d=6 qudits , 2005, 2005 Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference.

[20]  Hee Su Park,et al.  Generation and measurement of arbitrary four-dimensional spatial entanglement between photons in multicore fibers , 2018, Photonics Research.

[21]  Nicolas Gisin,et al.  Quantifying Photonic High-Dimensional Entanglement. , 2017, Physical review letters.

[22]  Michael L. Fanto,et al.  Quantifying entanglement in a 68-billion-dimensional quantum state space , 2018, Nature Communications.

[23]  John C. Howell,et al.  Introduction to the transverse spatial correlations in spontaneous parametric down-conversion through the biphoton birth zone , 2015, 1502.06996.

[24]  Umesh V. Vazirani,et al.  Fully device independent quantum key distribution , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[25]  D. Gauthier,et al.  High-dimensional quantum cryptography with twisted light , 2014, 1402.7113.

[26]  Nicolò Spagnolo,et al.  Benchmarking integrated linear-optical architectures for quantum information processing , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[27]  Robert W. Boyd,et al.  Tomography of the quantum state of photons entangled in high dimensions , 2011 .

[28]  Robert Fickler,et al.  Measuring azimuthal and radial modes of photons. , 2018, Optics express.

[29]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Bell Inequalities Tailored to Maximally Entangled States. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[30]  Leif Katsuo Oxenløwe,et al.  Stable Transmission of High-Dimensional Quantum States Over a 2-km Multicore Fiber , 2020, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[31]  G. B. Xavier,et al.  Multi-core fiber integrated multi-port beam splitters for quantum information processing , 2020 .

[33]  Nicolai Friis,et al.  Entanglement certification from theory to experiment , 2018, Nature Reviews Physics.

[34]  Robert Fickler,et al.  High-dimensional quantum gates using full-field spatial modes of photons , 2019, Optica.

[35]  Nicolas K. Fontaine,et al.  Laguerre-Gaussian mode sorter , 2018, Nature Communications.

[36]  M. Huber,et al.  The Schmidt number of a quantum state cannot always be device-independently certified , 2020, 2003.14189.

[37]  Peter W. Shor,et al.  Entanglement-assisted capacity of a quantum channel and the reverse Shannon theorem , 2001, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[38]  Stefano Pironio,et al.  Closing the detection loophole in Bell experiments using qudits. , 2009, Physical review letters.

[39]  Ebrahim Karimi,et al.  Limitations to the determination of a Laguerre–Gauss spectrum via projective, phase-flattening measurement , 2014, 1401.3512.

[40]  Varun B Verma,et al.  Kilopixel array of superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors. , 2019, Optics express.

[41]  Adetunmise C. Dada,et al.  Experimental high-dimensional two-photon entanglement and violations of generalized Bell inequalities , 2011, 1104.5087.

[42]  A. Zeilinger,et al.  Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons. , 2015, Physical review letters.

[43]  Zhi-Yuan Zhou,et al.  Coherent manipulation of a three-dimensional maximally entangled state , 2019, Quantum Information and Measurement (QIM) V: Quantum Technologies.

[44]  Matej Pivoluska,et al.  Measurements in two bases are sufficient for certifying high-dimensional entanglement , 2017, Nature Physics.

[45]  Frederic T. Chong,et al.  Asymptotic Improvements to Quantum Circuits via Qutrits , 2019, 2019 ACM/IEEE 46th Annual International Symposium on Computer Architecture (ISCA).

[46]  Mario Krenn,et al.  Experimental Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger entanglement beyond qubits , 2018, Nature Photonics.

[47]  A. Vaziri,et al.  Concentration of higher dimensional entanglement: qutrits of photon orbital angular momentum. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[48]  Cyril Branciard,et al.  Experimental test of local observer independence , 2019, Science Advances.

[49]  S. Barnett,et al.  Spatial Schmidt modes generated in parametric down-conversion , 2012, 1201.3041.

[50]  L. A. González,et al.  Pixelated phase computer holograms for the accurate encoding of scalar complex fields. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[51]  Will McCutcheon,et al.  Unscrambling entanglement through a complex medium , 2019, Nature Physics.