Using Property Induction to Evaluate Understanding of Mixing

Although reasoning skills have been investigated in a number of different domains, very little is known about how children and adults use them in chemistry. Here, participants from 4 years to adults saw various mixtures presented using a standard property induction paradigm. The category and appearance of everyday materials were varied to assess the extent that participants use these features to inform their judgments about what happens when these materials are mixed with water. In general, the results followed similar patterns seen when this paradigm has been applied to other domains, with both category and appearance informing inductive generalizations. The findings contrast with interview-based measures of children’s understanding of chemistry and offer an important addition to the field.

[1]  Renée Baillargeon,et al.  The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants , 1998, Cognition.

[2]  Mitchel van Loon,et al.  Mixed effects models , 2013 .

[3]  D. Heitjan,et al.  Mixed-effects models in psychophysiology. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[4]  E. Spelke,et al.  Origins of knowledge. , 1992, Psychological review.

[5]  P. Rozin,et al.  Now you see it, now you don't: The preschool child's conception of invisible particles in the context of dissolving. , 1993 .

[6]  Jazlin Ebenezer,et al.  Chemistry students' conceptions of solubility: A phenomenography , 1996 .

[7]  Brett K Hayes,et al.  Causal relations and feature similarity in children's inductive reasoning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  F. Marton,et al.  Students' conceptions of matter. , 1990 .

[9]  H. Wellman,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. , 1998 .

[10]  M. Nakhleh,et al.  Elementary school children's beliefs about matter , 1999 .

[11]  E. Markman,et al.  Young children's inductions from natural kinds: the role of categories and appearances. , 1987, Child development.

[12]  S. Gelman,et al.  On wooden pillows: multiple classification and children's category-based inductions. , 1992, Child development.

[13]  Philip Johnson,et al.  Children's understanding of substances, Part 2: Explaining chemical change , 2000 .

[14]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  A Comparison of Applied and Theoretical Knowledge of Concepts Based on the Particulate Nature of Matter. , 1991 .

[16]  S. Gelman,et al.  The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and infer - ences in two - year olds , 1990 .

[17]  Alipaşa Ayas,et al.  A Review of Solution Chemistry Studies: Insights into Students’ Conceptions , 2005 .

[18]  E. Markman,et al.  Categories and induction in young children , 1986, Cognition.

[19]  T. Au,et al.  Developing an intuitive understanding of conservation and contamination: invisible particles as a plausible mechanism , 1993 .

[20]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school , 2006 .

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  On differentiation: A case study of the development of the concepts of size, weight, and density , 1985, Cognition.

[22]  M. J. Farrar,et al.  Knowledge, concepts, and inferences in childhood. , 1992, Child development.