Comparison and evaluation of atmospheric correction algorithms of QUAC, DOS, and FLAASH for HICO hyperspectral imagery

In order to obtain the spectral information of objects and improve the retrieval of quantitative parameters from remotely sensing data accurately on land or over water bodies, atmospheric correction is a vital step, certainly, it is also a prerequisite to hyperspectral imagery data analysis approaches. On the base of previous studies, the atmospheric correction algorithms were divided to two categories: image-based empirical and model-based correction methods. The Quick Atmospheric Correction (QUAC) and Dark Object Subtraction (DOS) methods belong to the empirical or semiempirical methods, however, the Fast Line-of-sight Atmospheric Analysis of Spectral Hypercube (FLAASH) method was developed from the radiative transfer model. In this paper, we initially evaluated the performance from Hyperspectral Imager for the Coastal Ocean (HICO) of 16 Nov 2013 using QUAC, DOS, and MODTRAN integrated in FLAASH, and compared the results of these correction methods with in situ data. The results indicate that the method of FLAASH model performs much better than DOS and QUAC in atmospheric correction for HICO hyperspectral imagery, although the DOS and QUAC method is conducted more easily and do not require inputs of complex parameters.

[1]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery: Part I: Methods , 2001 .

[2]  Menghua Wang,et al.  A simple, moderately accurate, atmospheric correction algorithm for SeaWiFS☆ , 1994 .

[3]  S. Ekstrand,et al.  Assessment of forest damage with landsat TM: Correction for varying forest stand characteristics , 1994 .

[4]  Jim Aiken,et al.  The atmospheric correction of water colour and the quantitative retrieval of suspended particulate matter in Case II waters: Application to MERIS , 1999 .

[5]  M. S. Moran,et al.  Evaluation of simplified procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output , 1992 .

[6]  K. Kondratyev,et al.  An estimation of the surface solar ultraviolet irradiance during an extreme total ozone minimum , 1998 .

[7]  K. Kondratyev,et al.  On the relationship between total ozone and solar ultraviolet radiation at St. Petersburg, Russia , 1995 .

[8]  C. Justice,et al.  Atmospheric correction of visible to middle-infrared EOS-MODIS data over land surfaces: Background, operational algorithm and validation , 1997 .

[9]  Anthony J. Ratkowski,et al.  Validation of the QUick atmospheric correction (QUAC) algorithm for VNIR-SWIR multi- and hyperspectral imagery , 2005 .

[10]  Hongliang Fang,et al.  Atmospheric correction of Landsat ETM+ land surface imagery. I. Methods , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  Michael Corson,et al.  Hyperspectral Imager for the Coastal Ocean: instrument description and first images. , 2011, Applied optics.

[12]  Curtiss O. Davis,et al.  A New View of Coastal Oceans From the Space Station , 2011 .

[13]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .