Using psychophysiological measures to estimate dimensions of emotion in hedonic experiences

Abstract In recent years, researchers have been interested in how emotional factors manifest during user system interactions. One example of this topic is the use of psychophysiological sensors as a complementary way to measure user's emotions with hedonic applications. Some psychophysiological measures have already been correlated with both valence and arousal, the main dimensions of emotion. However, a consensus has not been reached on which psychophysiological measure better represents the dimensions of emotion. This study presents three combined non-invasive psychophysiological measures that were used to verify which better represents the dimensions of emotion. An experiment was conducted using quantitative and qualitative data analysis, and the results were: a significant correlation between valence and variation of heart rate, and between arousal and alpha band. The results are relevant to fields interested in the analysis of human behavior in interacting situations, since they can help design experiments that consider user emotions.

[1]  Camila Loiola Brito Maia,et al.  A Systematic Review About User Experience Evaluation , 2016, HCI.

[2]  Hatice Gunes,et al.  Measuring Affective, Physiological and Behavioural Differences in Solo, Competitive and Collaborative Games , 2016, INTETAIN.

[3]  Georgios N. Yannakakis,et al.  Correlation between heart rate, electrodermal activity and player experience in first-person shooter games , 2010, Sandbox '10.

[4]  Virpi Roto,et al.  User Experience Evaluation Methods in Academic and Industrial Contexts , 2009 .

[5]  Heather L. O'Brien,et al.  Mixed-methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Jeff Sauro,et al.  Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research , 2012 .

[7]  Kun-Pyo Lee,et al.  The relationship between difficulty and hedonic satisfaction of video games , 2009 .

[8]  Ningjiu Tang,et al.  Effects of Display Characteristics on Presence and Emotional Responses of Game Players , 2015 .

[9]  Rocco J. Perla,et al.  Ten Common Misunderstandings, Misconceptions, Persistent Myths and Urban Legends about Likert Scales and Likert Response Formats and their Antidotes , 2007 .

[10]  Harold W. Thimbleby,et al.  User experience evaluation through the brain's electrical activity , 2014, NordiCHI.

[11]  Stephen H. Fairclough,et al.  Capturing user engagement via psychophysiology: measures and mechanisms for biocybernetic adaptation , 2013, Int. J. Auton. Adapt. Commun. Syst..

[12]  Foglia Pierfrancesco,et al.  Towards Relating Physiological Signals to Usability Metrics: A Case Study with a Web Avatar , 2014 .

[13]  Christian Mühl,et al.  Valence, arousal and dominance in the EEG during game play , 2013, Int. J. Auton. Adapt. Commun. Syst..

[14]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Evaluating User Experience Factors Using Experiments: Expressive Artificial Faces Embedded in Contexts , 2010, Evaluating User Experience in Games.

[15]  Camila Loiola Brito Maia,et al.  ReTUXE: A framework for user's emotional evaluation based on psychophysiological measures , 2017, IHC.

[16]  Sergi Bermúdez i Badia,et al.  EEG correlates of video game experience and user profile in motor-imagery-based brain–computer interaction , 2016, The Visual Computer.

[17]  Jo Ueyama,et al.  Assessing users’ emotion at interaction time: a multimodal approach with multiple sensors , 2017, Soft Comput..

[18]  J. Russell A circumplex model of affect. , 1980 .

[19]  Camila Loiola Brito Maia,et al.  Uma revisão sistemática sobre medição da experiência do usuário , 2014, IHC.

[20]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Measuring engagement in video game-based environments: Investigation of the User Engagement Scale , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .