Mapping the political economy of education technology: A networks perspective

The field of education technology (edtech) has emerged as a complex, multimillion-dollar industry, with various hubs in the USA leading the boom. This exploratory article uses a networks perspective to reveal the power dynamics of investor firms in edtech. The analysis examines the current top venture capitalists and their edtech companies, based on primary funding relationships. The article begins with an explanation of how edtech emerged, an overview of the K-12 environment, and an analysis as to why edtech companies have become vital players in the education sector in the USA. This study highlights the most influential actors in the edtech political economy and their structures and interactions, and concludes with recommendations for future research. The investigation has involved examining the top investors and companies closely, alongside the political and economic motivations behind their investments.

[1]  Brun González.  Disruptive Classroom Technologies: A Framework for Innovation in Education , 2018 .

[2]  Neil Selwyn,et al.  Selling tech to teachers: education trade shows as policy events , 2018 .

[3]  M. Tesar,et al.  True Fake News: Reshaping educational policies with the #MarchofOurLives , 2018 .

[4]  Nina Hood.  Re-imagining the nature of (student-focused) learning through digital technology , 2018 .

[5]  C. Lubienski.  The critical challenge: Policy networks and market models for education , 2018 .

[6]  Faith Boninger,et al.  Asleep at the Switch: Schoolhouse Commercialism, Student Privacy, and the Failure of Policymaking , 2017 .

[7]  Elana Zeide,et al.  The Limits of Education Purpose Limitations , 2017 .

[8]  Marta P. Baltodano.  The power brokers of neoliberalism: Philanthrocapitalists and public education , 2017 .

[9]  C. Convertino,et al.  Public borders, private crossings: Anthropological approaches to neoliberalism in US educational policy and spaces , 2017 .

[10]  Dylan Peterson,et al.  Edtech and Student Privacy: California Law as a Model , 2016 .

[11]  M. Tesar.  On ethics, policy and the philosophy of education , 2016 .

[12]  Elana Zeide.  Student Privacy Principles for the Age of Big Data: Moving Beyond FERPA and FIPPs , 2016 .

[13]  B. Lingard,et al.  Commercialising comparison: Pearson puts the TLC in soft capitalism , 2016 .

[14]  M. Tesar.  Policy and philosophy in the contemporary educational landscape , 2016 .

[15]  Mark J. Garrison,et al.  Netflixing human capital development: personalized learning technology and the corporatization of K-12 education , 2016 .

[16]  Frank C. Gomez,et al.  Rethinking Education in the Age of Technology: The Digital Revolution and Schooling in America , 2016 .

[17]  M. Tesar.  The future of Policy Futures in Education , 2015 .

[18]  Zoran Zdravev,et al.  Big data for education data mining, data analytics and web dashboards , 2015 .

[19]  Ryan S. Baker,et al.  Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics , 2014 .

[20]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Analyzing social networks , 2013 .

[21]  Joel R. Reidenberg,et al.  Privacy and Cloud Computing in Public Schools , 2013 .

[22]  Sarah Reckhow,et al.  Follow the Money: How Foundation Dollars Change Public School Politics , 2012 .

[23]  S. Ball,et al.  Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary , 2012 .

[24]  Larry Cuban.  Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America , 2010 .

[25]  A. Aviram,et al.  When the Virtual Meets Virtue: From E-Learning to E-Education , 2009 .

[26]  L. Winner.  Information Technology and Educational Amnesia , 2009 .

[27]  Y. Amichai-Hamburger.  E-Learning: Is Technology the Lighthouse? , 2009 .

[28]  G. Bull,et al.  Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education , 2009 .

[29]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[30]  M. Bishop,et al.  Philanthrocapitalism: How Giving Can Save the World , 2008 .

[31]  A. Molnar.  The commercial transformation of public education , 2006 .

[32]  L. Schrum.  Education and Commercialization: Raising Awareness and Making Wise Decisions , 2002 .

[33]  R. Hanneman.  Introduction to Social Network Methods , 2001 .

[34]  Gene V. Glass,et al.  Politics, Markets, and America's Schools , 1990 .

[35]  R. Herdman.  The congressional Office of Technology Assessment. , 1989, JAMA.

[36]  Stephen B. Seidman,et al.  Network structure and minimum degree , 1983 .

[37]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.