Digital privacy: Replacing pedestrians from Google Street View images

Given the lack of modern techniques to ensure the digital privacy of individuals, we want to pave the way for a new approach to make pedestrians in cityscape images anonymous. To address these concerns, we propose an automated method to replace any unknown pedestrian with another one which is extracted from a controlled and authorized dataset. The techniques used up to now to make people anonymous are based mainly on the blurring of people's faces, but even so it is possible to trace the identity of the subject starting from his clothing, personal items, hairstyle, the place and time where the photo was taken. The proposed method aims to make the pedestrians completely anonymous, and consists of four phases: firstly we identify the area where the pedestrian is located, we separate the pedestrian from the background, we select the most similar pedestrian from a controlled dataset and subsequently we substitute it. Our case study is Google Street View because it is one of the online services which suffers most from this kind of privacy issues. The experimental results show how this technique can overcome the problems of digital privacy with promising results.

[1]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  A Survey of Recent Advances in Face Detection , 2010 .

[2]  Christian Früh,et al.  Google Street View: Capturing the World at Street Level , 2010, Computer.

[3]  Dariu Gavrila,et al.  Monocular Pedestrian Detection: Survey and Experiments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  Daniel T. Larose,et al.  Discovering Knowledge in Data: An Introduction to Data Mining , 2005 .

[5]  Michael F. Cohen,et al.  Image and Video Matting: A Survey , 2007, Found. Trends Comput. Graph. Vis..

[6]  Ignazio Gallo,et al.  Learning Object Segmentation using a Multi Network Segment Classification Approach , 2012, VISAPP.

[7]  Hamid K. Aghajan,et al.  Multiple camera-based chamfer matching for pedestrian detection , 2008, 2008 Second ACM/IEEE International Conference on Distributed Smart Cameras.

[8]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[9]  H. Tavani,et al.  Ethics and technology : controversies, questions, and strategies for ethical computing , 2010 .

[10]  James Thornton Individual privacy rights with respect to services such as Google Street View , 2010, CSOC.

[11]  Marco Zennaro,et al.  Large-scale privacy protection in Google Street View , 2009, 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[12]  David Gerónimo Gómez,et al.  Survey of Pedestrian Detection for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  Timothy K. Shih,et al.  Keynote 3: Digital Inpainting - Survey and Multilayer Image Inpainting Algorithms , 2005, ICITA.

[14]  Blake J. Roessler,et al.  The Value of Privacy , 2004 .

[15]  Serge J. Belongie,et al.  Removing pedestrians from Google street view images , 2010, 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops.

[16]  Bill Triggs,et al.  Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[17]  Takashi Shibata,et al.  Fast and Structure-preserving Inpainting Based on Probabilistic Structure Estimation , 2011, MVA.

[18]  Michael F. Cohen,et al.  Simultaneous Matting and Compositing , 2006, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.