Student evaluation of teaching enhances faculty professional development

This paper highlights the role of Web 2.0 technologies in sourcing ongoing information from university students in an effort to assist faculty in their continuous professional development (PD), with the ultimate goal of incrementally improving teaching and learning. On a semester basis, students use an online program called CoursEvals to provide their opinions about the course and its instructor. The collected data are used to inform the content and delivery of faculty PD workshops. The interactive nature of CoursEvals, with Web features that facilitate information sharing and interoperatibility with Blackboard, a learning/course management system, make it ideal for impacting higher education. Students can complete student evaluation of teaching (SEOT) online from any location (university, home, mobile, or overseas). This paper underscores the interactive nature of the feedback process that allows faculty, administration, policy makers, and other stakeholders to participate in the ongoing improvement of teaching and learning. We see how Web 2.0 technologies can impact the teaching/learning nexus in higher education, how online forums and Blackboard bulletin boards have helped popularize Web 2.0 technologies, how online social interactions have escalated through wikis, blogs, emails, instant messaging, and audio and video clips, and how faculty can retrieve their personal SEOT at any time and use the information to self- or pee-evaluate at their convenience. Faculty can compare their SEOT over time to determine stability and monitor their classroom effectiveness. They can also address reliability and validity issues and use the information judiciously without making unnecessary generalizations. Researchers will find useful information supporting the impact of Web 2.0 technologies in higher education.

[1]  Raymond P. Perry,et al.  The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An Evidence-Based Perspective , 2007 .

[2]  H. G. Murray,et al.  Using Multiple Outcomes to Validate Student Ratings of Overall Teacher Effectiveness. , 1995 .

[3]  H. Marsh.  Students’ Evaluations of University Teaching: Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases and Usefulness , 1984 .

[4]  J. Centra.  Student Ratings of Instruction and Their Relationship to Student Learning , 1976 .

[5]  Philip Banyard,et al.  The Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching in Higher Education: Love me, love my lectures? , 2000 .

[6]  P. Ramsden.  A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The Course Experience Questionnaire , 1991 .

[7]  Clay Shirky,et al.  Here Comes Everybody , 2017 .

[8]  J. P. Rushton,et al.  Teacher personality traits and student instructional ratings in six types of university courses , 1990 .

[9]  Wilbert J. McKeachie,et al.  Research on College Teaching: The Historical Background. , 1990 .

[10]  P. Abrami,et al.  Students' Evaluations of University Teaching: Research Findings, Methodological Issues, and Directions for Future Research , 1987 .

[11]  P. A. Cohen.  Student Ratings of Instruction and Student Achievement: A Meta-analysis of Multisection Validity Studies , 1981 .

[12]  Benjamin H. Layne,et al.  ELECTRONIC VERSUS TRADITIONAL STUDENT RATINGS OF INSTRUCTION , 1999 .

[13]  R. Mason,et al.  Using Web 2.0 for learning in the community , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  William E. Becker,et al.  How Departments of Economics Evaluate Teaching , 1999 .

[15]  Daniel Lewis,et al.  What is web 2.0? , 2006, CROS.

[16]  Peter Seldin,et al.  Changing practices in faculty evaluation , 1985 .

[17]  P. Abrami,et al.  Navigating student ratings of instruction. , 1997 .

[18]  H. Marsh.  Students ' Evaluations of University Teaching : Dimensionality , Reliability , Validity , Potential Biases , and Utility , 2005 .

[19]  Curt J. Dommeyer,et al.  Attitudes of Business Faculty Towards Two Methods of Collecting Teaching Evaluations: Paper vs. Online , 2002 .

[20]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature , 2005 .