Physical attractiveness and subjective well-being.

Three studies were conducted to determine whether physical attractiveness (PAT) is related to subjective well-being (SWB). In the first study (N - 221), unselected students were photographed and videotaped. In the second study (N = 131), participants were selected on the basis of extremes in PAT, and in the third study (TV = 155), participants were preselected for extreme scores on SWB. Correlations between SWB and PAT varied from .03 to .33. In Study 1 the mean correlation between PAT and SWB was .13. When appearance enhancers (hair, clothing, and jewelry) were covered or removed in Studies 2 and 3, the correlation between PAT and SWB dropped, suggesting that part of the SWB-PAT relation might be due to happier people doing more to enhance their beauty. The impact of PAT on SWB may be mitigated by the fact that others agree on a target's PAT at only modest levels. It was found that self-perceptions of PAT were correlated with both one's objective PAT and one's SWB. Is physical attractiveness (PAT) a cause of subjective well-being (SWB)? Our values suggest that it should not be. We hope that our inner qualities, and not simply our outward appearance, cause life satisfaction. Physical attractiveness, however, appears to be a powerful resource in western society. Because resources help people obtain rewards, PAT may cause SWB. Early studies demonstrated that PAT is an important resource. Dion, Berscheid, and Walster (1972) found that more attractive persons were perceived to be warmer, stronger, and more poised, and were considered to be more exciting dates than those who were less attractive. In a meta-analysis of the literature, Feingold (1992) concluded that attractive people are perceived to be "more sociable, dominant, sexually warm, mentally healthy, intelligent, and socially skilled than unattractive people" (p. 304). Several studies have shown that the biases toward attractive people begin in childhood. For example, Clifford and Walster (1973) asked grade school teachers to examine academic records of children. Even though the performance information was identical in all of the files, teachers rated the attractive children as more intelligent and popular. These biases persevere into adulthood (e.g., Dipboye, Arvey, & Terpstra, 1977). As one might expect, beautiful adults fare better in social spheres (Berscheid & Walster, 1974; Curran & Lip

[1]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[2]  K. Motamedi The quality of American life , 1976 .

[3]  R. Larsen,et al.  Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality , 1976 .

[5]  A. Feingold Good-looking people are not what we think. , 1992 .

[6]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  E. Diener,et al.  Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  E. Walster,et al.  The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on Teacher Expectations , 2012 .

[9]  E. Diener,et al.  Resources, personal strivings, and subjective well-being: a nomothetic and idiographic approach. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  John P. Robinson,et al.  CHAPTER 3 – Measures of Subjective Well-Being , 1991 .

[11]  P. Costa,et al.  Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Robert A Emmons Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. , 1986 .

[13]  M. Rosenberg Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[14]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. , 1984, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  P. Brickman,et al.  Lottery winners and accident victims: is happiness relative? , 1978, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  A. C. Downs,et al.  Natural Observations of the Links between Attractiveness and Initial Legal Judgments , 1991 .

[17]  Ed Diener,et al.  Subjective Well‐Being: The Convergence and Stability of Self‐Report and Non‐Self‐Report Measures , 1993 .

[18]  J. Curran,et al.  The effects of physical attraction and attitude similarity on attraction in dating dyads , 1975 .

[19]  Ed Diener,et al.  An evaluation of subjective well-being measures , 1985 .

[20]  Willard L. Rodgers,et al.  The Sense of Well-Being: Developing Measures. (Book Reviews: The Quality of American Life. Perceptions, Evaluations, and Satisfactions) , 1976 .

[21]  John P. Robinson,et al.  Measures Of Personality And Social Psychological Attitudes , 1991 .

[22]  D. Umberson,et al.  The impact of physical attractiveness on achievement and psychological well-being. , 1987 .

[23]  A. Eagly,et al.  What is beautiful is good, but…: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. , 1991 .

[24]  E. Berscheid,et al.  What is beautiful is good. , 1972, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  E. Diener,et al.  Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1993 .

[26]  M. Fordyce,et al.  A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health , 1988 .

[27]  L. F. Barrett,et al.  Handbook of Emotions , 1993 .

[28]  T. F. Cash,et al.  Body image, physical attractiveness, and depression , 1985 .

[29]  Susan Sprecher,et al.  Mirror, Mirror: The Importance of Looks in Everyday Life , 1985 .

[30]  R. L. Dipboye,et al.  Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resumé evaluations. , 1977 .