Assessing Research Performance of University Academic Staff: Measures and Problems

ABSTRACT Under the federal government's current policy on funding university research, institutions which can best identify and encourage the higher performers amongst their academic staff will fare better than others. However, in order to secure a strong position in competing for these government funds universities will need to know more about the research activity of their academic staff and how staff in different disciplines are likely to respond to the increased use of performance indicators. This paper reports the views of staff from one Australian university on such issues. One of the main findings is that potential research output is influenced by a range of factors including the differences in research styles, methods and strategies and the degree of dependence on funds. Such findings favour the differential use of performance measures depending on the nature of the research undertaken rather than the use of measures which are intended to standardise research output within or across disciplines.

[1]  Roland J. Liebert.  Research-Grant Getting and Productivity among Scholars: Recent National Patterns of Competition and Favor , 1977 .

[2]  H. Moed,et al.  The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance , 1985 .

[3]  RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF TENURED AND NONTENURED FACULTY IN U.S. UNIVERSITIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FOUR FIELDS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS , 1979 .

[4]  John M. Braxton,et al.  Faculty uses of doctoral training: Consideration of a technique for the differentiation of scholarly effort from research activity , 1982 .

[5]  Janice Beyer Lodahl,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. , 1972 .

[6]  Ingrid Moses,et al.  Promotion of academic staff , 1986 .

[7]  L. Dubridge.  The Future of University Research , 1969 .

[8]  Roland J. Liebert.  Research-Grant Getting and Productivity Among Scholars. , 1977 .

[9]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Faculty Research Performance: Lessons from the Sciences and the Social Sciences. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1985. , 1985 .

[10]  Rudi K. F. Bresser.  Ideologies and the measurement of academic effectiveness , 1985 .

[11]  C. Garner,et al.  Academic Publication, Market Signaling, and Scientific Research Decisions , 1979 .

[12]  J. P. Powell,et al.  How academics view their work , 1983 .

[13]  G. Haim.  Academic ideologies and styles of research among academic researchers , 1981 .

[14]  Rudi K. F. Bresser.  The context of university departments: Differences between fields of higher and lower levels of paradigm development , 1984 .

[15]  Harriet Zuckerman,et al.  Stratification in American Science , 1970 .

[16]  L. West.  Publication Rates and Research Productivity. , 1980 .

[17]  D. Boud,et al.  Changes in Academic Staff Perceptions of the Status of Teaching and Research , 1985 .

[18]  John P. Bean,et al.  Research output, socialization, and the biglan model , 1981 .

[19]  A. J. Grimes.  Cosmopolitian-local: A multidimensional construct , 1980 .

[20]  J. S. Dawkins,et al.  Higher education: a policy statement , 1988 .

[21]  A. Biglan.  Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. , 1973 .

[22]  B. Reskin.  Scientific Productivity and the Reward Structure of Science , 1977 .

[23]  J. S. Stark,et al.  Faculty roles and role preferences in ten fields of professional study , 1986 .

[24]  J. Creswell.  Concluding Thoughts: Observing, Promoting, Evaluating, and Reviewing Research Performance. , 1986 .

[25]  P. Blau.  The Organization of Academic Work , 2021 .

[26]  Lewis Elton,et al.  Research and teaching: symbiosis or conflict , 1986 .

[27]  C. Pollitt.  The politics of performance assessment: Lessons for higher education? , 1987 .

[28]  B. Clark,et al.  The Higher Education System , 2023 .

[29]  Lawrence R. Jauch,et al.  Evaluation of University Professors' Research Performance , 1975 .

[30]  Predictors of funding in academic fields , 1978 .