The contribution of on-road studies of road user behaviour to improving road safety.

For over 40 years transport safety researchers have been using methods of vehicle instrumentation to gain greater insights into the factors that contribute to road user crash risk and the associated crash factors. In the previous decade in particular the widespread availability of lower cost and more advanced methods of vehicle instrumentation and recording technologies are supporting the increasing number of on-road research studies worldwide. The design of these studies ranges from multi-method studies using instrumented test vehicles and defined driving routes, to field operational tests, through to much larger and more naturalistic studies. It is timely to assess the utility of these methods for studying the influences of driver characteristics and states, the design and operation of the road system, and the influences of in-vehicle technologies on behaviour and safety for various road user groups. This special issue considers the extent to which on-road studies using vehicle instrumentation have been used to advance knowledge across these areas of road safety research. The papers included in this issue illustrate how research using instrumented test vehicles continues to generate new knowledge, and how the larger scale United States and European naturalistic and field operational test studies are providing a wealth of data about road user behaviour in real traffic. This is balanced with a number of studies that present methodological developments in data collection and analysis methods that, while promising, need further validation. The use of on-road methods to accurately describe the behaviours occurring in everyday real-world conditions, to quantify risks for safety critical events, and an improved understanding of the factors that contribute to risk, clearly has huge potential to promote further road trauma reductions.

[1]  Martin Helander,et al.  An instrumented vehicle for studies of driver behaviour , 1976 .

[2]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Phase II – Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment , 2006 .

[3]  Marco Dozza,et al.  Initial Analyses from the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study - Addressing Driver Performance and Behavior in Traffic Safety , 2013 .

[4]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  An Assessment of Commercial Motor Vehicle Driver Distraction Using Naturalistic Driving Data , 2012, Traffic injury prevention.

[5]  Juergen Pahl,et al.  A COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT METHODS FOR DETERMINING ACCIDENT POTENTIAL , 1970 .

[6]  Julie McClafferty,et al.  Chapter 6 – Naturalistic Driving Studies and Data Coding and Analysis Techniques , 2011 .

[7]  Linda Ng Boyle,et al.  Driver's lane keeping ability with eyes off road: Insights from a naturalistic study. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Thomas A. Dingus,et al.  The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-Crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study Data , 2006 .

[9]  David LeBlanc,et al.  Driving behaviors in early stage dementia: a study using in-vehicle technology. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Thomas A Dingus,et al.  Naturalistic assessment of novice teenage crash experience. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[11]  Paul P Jovanis,et al.  Crashes and crash-surrogate events: exploratory modeling with naturalistic driving data. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  J F O'Hanlon,et al.  Diazepam impairs lateral position control in highway driving. , 1982, Science.

[13]  Tami Toroyan,et al.  Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for Action , 2009 .

[14]  Feng Guo,et al.  Individual driver risk assessment using naturalistic driving data. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Bryan E. Porter,et al.  Handbook of Traffic Psychology , 2011 .