Acidification of urine is not a feasible method for preventing encrustation of indwelling urinary catheters.

Encrusting deposits form on urinary catheters as a result of infection by bacteria which produce urease. Urease catalyses the hydrolysis of urea to produce ammonia, with the result that the pH of the urine increases and the deposits are precipitated. It has been suggested that acidification of urine may prevent this rise in pH and so prevent encrustation. Experiments were performed in vitro to determine whether acidification could be used to prevent the rise in pH when urease is present in urine. It was found that, in the presence of urease, the initial decrease in pH resulting from acidification was countered by further urea being converted into ammonia. Thus, although acidic washout solutions may dissolve encrusting deposits, acidification of urine is not a feasible method for preventing catheter encrustation.

[1]  D. S. Hickey,et al.  Catheter encrustation by struvite. , 2008, British journal of urology.

[2]  C. Bratt,et al.  Relationship between urease-producing bacteria, urinary pH and encrustation on indwelling urinary catheters. , 1991, British journal of urology.

[3]  A. Mulhall,et al.  The encrustation of indwelling catheters. , 1991, British journal of urology.

[4]  C. Kunin,et al.  Indwelling urinary catheters in the elderly. Relation of "catheter life" to formation of encrustations in patients with and without blocked catheters. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[5]  H. Hedelin,et al.  Urease-induced crystallization in synthetic urine. , 1985, The Journal of urology.

[6]  A. Kennedy.  Trial of a new bladder washout system. , 1984, Nursing times.

[7]  H. Hedelin,et al.  The composition of catheter encrustations, including the effects of allopurinol treatment. , 1984, British journal of urology.

[8]  C. Kunin.  Detection, Prevention, and Management of Urinary Tract Infections , 1979 .

[9]  D. Musher,et al.  Urease. The primary cause of infection-induced urinary stones. , 1976, Investigative urology.

[10]  A. Bruce,et al.  The problem of catheter encrustation. , 1974, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[11]  F. J. Murphy,et al.  Ascorbic acid as a urinary acidifying agent. 2. Its adjunctive role in chronic urinary infection. , 1965, The Journal of urology.

[12]  W. Quaide,et al.  Mineralogical studies of urine: the relationship of apatite, brushite and struvite to urinary pH. , 1958, The Journal of urology.

[13]  A. Hesse,et al.  Experimental investigations on dissolution of incrustations on the surface of catheters. , 1989, Urologia internationalis.

[14]  D. Hukins,et al.  An automated technique for in vitro assessment of the susceptibility of urinary catheter materials to encrustation. , 1987, Engineering in medicine.

[15]  C. Osborne,et al.  Infection (urease) stones. , 1987, Mineral and electrolyte metabolism.

[16]  H. Hedelin,et al.  Factors influencing the time long-term indwelling Foley catheters can be kept in situ. , 1985, European urology.

[17]  A. Norberg,et al.  Urinary pH and the indwelling catheter. , 1980, Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences.

[18]  J. Miller,et al.  An enzymatic method to make struvite crystals. , 1974, Investigative urology.