Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics

The emergence of inland ports took place in several regions around the world, notably where the growth of inland freight distribution required a massification of flows. Yet, there is no definitive consensus about how such inland facilities should be labeled, with terms such as dry ports being advocated. It is suggested in the paper that the term inland port is a more appropriate construct since it considers terminal activities as well as the crucial logistics activities taking place in co-location or in proximity of inland terminals. This perspective requires the investigation of how transport and supply chain functions and the various actors involved in their setting and operations are taking shape in inland ports. Case studies pertaining to European and North American inland ports are presented. Although inland ports are planned, set and operated by a wide variety of actors, ranging from public to private interests, transport and supply chain functions tend to label them as satellite terminals, load centers or transmodal centers.

[1]  Yehuda Hayuth,et al.  INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION AND THE HINTERLAND CONCEPT , 1982 .

[2]  T. Notteboom,et al.  Foreland-based regionalization: Integrating intermediate hubs with port hinterlands , 2010 .

[3]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Complementarity and Substitutability among Adjacent Gateway Ports , 2009 .

[4]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[5]  P. D. de Langen,et al.  Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community , 2008 .

[6]  R. F. Poist,et al.  North American inland port development: international vs domestic shipper preferences , 2004 .

[7]  B. Slack Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion? , 1999 .

[8]  T. Notteboom,et al.  The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships , 2009 .

[9]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  INTERMODAL FREIGHT TERMINALS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE TERMINAL MARKET , 1999 .

[10]  E. Gouvernal,et al.  Intermodal Rail in Western Europe: Actors and Services in a New Regulatory Environment , 2006 .

[11]  S. Pettit,et al.  Port development: from gateways to logistics hubs , 2009 .

[12]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland , 2009 .

[13]  R Harrison,et al.  THE IDENTIFICATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF INLAND PORTS , 2001 .

[14]  P. Verhoeven,et al.  European ports policy: meeting contemporary governance challenges , 2009 .

[15]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Inland Terminals within North American and European Supply Chains , 2009 .

[16]  Leibniz-Informationszentrum Wirtschaft,et al.  Empirical evidence for integration and disintegration of maritime shipping, port and logistics activities , 2009 .

[17]  E. Gouvernal,et al.  Container Railfreight Services in North‐west Europe: Diversity of Organizational Forms in a Liberalizing Environment , 2005 .

[18]  Girish Gujar,et al.  The spatial characteristics of inland transport hubs: evidences from Southern India , 2009 .