Visual Measurement of Suture Strain for Robotic Surgery

Minimally invasive surgical procedures offer advantages of smaller incisions, decreased hospital length of stay, and rapid postoperative recovery to the patient. Surgical robots improve access and visualization intraoperatively and have expanded the indications for minimally invasive procedures. A limitation of the DaVinci surgical robot is a lack of sensory feedback to the operative surgeon. Experienced robotic surgeons use visual interpretation of tissue and suture deformation as a surrogate for tactile feedback. A difficulty encountered during robotic surgery is maintaining adequate suture tension while tying knots or following a running anastomotic suture. Displaying suture strain in real time has potential to decrease the learning curve and improve the performance and safety of robotic surgical procedures. Conventional strain measurement methods involve installation of complex sensors on the robotic instruments. This paper presents a noninvasive video processing-based method to determine strain in surgical sutures. The method accurately calculates strain in suture by processing video from the existing surgical camera, making implementation uncomplicated. The video analysis method was developed and validated using video of suture strain standards on a servohydraulic testing system. The video-based suture strain algorithm is shown capable of measuring suture strains of 0.2% with subpixel resolution and proven reliability under various conditions.

[1]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Use of the Hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures , 1972, CACM.

[2]  D. Yuh,et al.  Effects of visual force feedback on robot-assisted surgical task performance. , 2008, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Image Processing, Analysis and Machine Vision , 1993, Springer US.

[4]  Shigeyuki Shimachi,et al.  Adapter for contact force sensing of the da Vinci® robot , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[5]  M. Mack,et al.  Computer-assisted telemanipulation: an enabling technology for endoscopic coronary artery bypass. , 1998, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[6]  T. Paulalbear,et al.  Mechanical Comparison of 10 Suture Materials before and after in Vivo Incubation , 2004 .

[7]  E.E. Pissaloux,et al.  Image Processing , 1994, Proceedings. Second Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing.

[8]  D. Burschka,et al.  Dynamic Augmented Reality for Sensory Substitution in Robot-Assisted Surgical Systems , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  M. Mack,et al.  Minimally invasive and robotic surgery. , 2001, JAMA.

[10]  M. E. Hagen,et al.  Visual clues act as a substitute for haptic feedback in robotic surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  Diana Gerhardus Robot-assisted surgery: the future is here. , 2003, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[12]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image processing , 1971 .

[13]  D. Yuh,et al.  Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.