Regularized reconstruction of absorbing and phase objects from a single in-line hologram, application to fluid mechanics and micro-biology.

Reconstruction of phase objects is a central problem in digital holography, whose various applications include microscopy, biomedical imaging, and fluid mechanics. Starting from a single in-line hologram, there is no direct way to recover the phase of the diffracted wave in the hologram plane. The reconstruction of absorbing and phase objects therefore requires the inversion of the non-linear hologram formation model. We propose a regularized reconstruction method that includes several physically-grounded constraints such as bounds on transmittance values, maximum/minimum phase, spatial smoothness or the absence of any object in parts of the field of view. To solve the non-convex and non-smooth optimization problem induced by our modeling, a variable splitting strategy is applied and the closed-form solution of the sub-problem (the so-called proximal operator) is derived. The resulting algorithm is efficient and is shown to lead to quantitative phase estimation on reconstructions of accurate simulations of in-line holograms based on the Mie theory. As our approach is adaptable to several in-line digital holography configurations, we present and discuss the promising results of reconstructions from experimental in-line holograms obtained in two different applications: the tracking of an evaporating droplet (size ∼ 100μm) and the microscopic imaging of bacteria (size ∼ 1μm).

[1]  Mozhdeh Seifi,et al.  Evaporating droplet hologram simulation for digital in-line holography setup with divergent beam. , 2013, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[2]  Eter,et al.  Regularized non-convex image reconstruction in digital holographic microscopy , 2017 .

[3]  Falk Eilenberger,et al.  Digital holography from shadowgraphic phase estimates , 2010, Photonics Europe.

[4]  I. Yamaguchi,et al.  Image formation in phase-shifting digital holography and applications to microscopy. , 2001, Applied optics.

[5]  Hakho Lee,et al.  Sparsity-Based Pixel Super Resolution for Lens-Free Digital In-line Holography , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[6]  Michael Unser,et al.  A practical inverse-problem approach to digital holographic reconstruction. , 2013, Optics express.

[7]  Michael Unser,et al.  Proximity operators for phase retrieval. , 2016, Applied optics.

[8]  Warren Hare,et al.  Computing proximal points of nonconvex functions , 2008, Math. Program..

[9]  N. Grosjean,et al.  Digital holographic measurement of the Lagrangian evaporation rate of droplets dispersing in a homogeneous isotropic turbulence , 2017 .

[10]  Loïc Denis,et al.  Inline hologram reconstruction with sparsity constraints. , 2009, Optics letters.

[11]  Patrick L. Combettes,et al.  Proximal Splitting Methods in Signal Processing , 2009, Fixed-Point Algorithms for Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering.

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[13]  Thierry Fournel,et al.  Pixel super-resolution in digital holography by regularized reconstruction , 2017 .

[14]  Ferréol Soulez,et al.  Inverse problem approach in particle digital holography: out-of-field particle detection made possible. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[15]  R Riesenberg,et al.  Quantitative phase and refractive index measurements with point-source digital in-line holographic microscopy. , 2012, Applied optics.

[16]  Jean-Marc Dinten,et al.  Comparative study of fully three-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for lens-free microscopy. , 2017, Applied optics.

[17]  Jingjuan Zhang,et al.  Phase-retrieval algorithms applied in a 4-f system for optical image encryption: a comparison , 2005, SPIE/COS Photonics Asia.

[18]  Jeffrey A Fessler,et al.  Penalized-likelihood image reconstruction for digital holography. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[19]  M. Unser,et al.  Complex-wave retrieval from a single off-axis hologram. , 2004, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[20]  Guoan Zheng,et al.  Subsampled phase retrieval for temporal resolution enhancement in lensless on-chip holographic video. , 2017, Biomedical optics express.

[21]  G. Gréhan,et al.  Electromagnetic scattering from a multilayered sphere located in an arbitrary beam. , 1995, Applied optics.

[22]  Loïc Denis,et al.  Testing an in-line digital holography ‘inverse method’ for the Lagrangian tracking of evaporating droplets in homogeneous nearly isotropic turbulence , 2012 .

[23]  D. Gabor A New Microscopic Principle , 1948, Nature.

[24]  Yibo Zhang,et al.  Sparsity-based multi-height phase recovery in holographic microscopy , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Justin Lee,et al.  Lensless computational imaging through deep learning , 2017, ArXiv.

[26]  Thierry Fournel,et al.  Digital Hologram Processing in On-Axis Holography , 2014 .

[27]  P. Massoli,et al.  Scattering of electromagnetic-plane waves by radially inhomogeneous spheres: a finely stratified sphere model. , 1994, Applied optics.

[28]  Ferréol Soulez,et al.  Inverse-problem approach for particle digital holography: accurate location based on local optimization. , 2007, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[29]  H. Ottevaere,et al.  Studies on the sparsifying operator in compressive digital holography. , 2017, Optics express.

[30]  Eric Thiebaut,et al.  Optimization issues in blind deconvolution algorithms , 2002, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.