A hydrogel-based microfluidic device for the studies of directed cell migration.

We have developed a hydrogel-based microfluidic device that is capable of generating a steady and long term linear chemical concentration gradient with no through flow in a microfluidic channel. Using this device, we successfully monitored the chemotactic responses of wildtype Escherichia coli (suspension cells) to alpha-methyl-DL-aspartate (attractant) and differentiated HL-60 cells (a human neutrophil-like cell line that is adherent) to formyl-Met-Leu-Phe (f-MLP, attractant). This device advances the current state of the art in microchemotaxis devices in that (1) it demonstrates the validity of using hydrogels as the building material for a microchemotaxis device; (2) it demonstrates the potential of the hydrogel based microfluidic device in biological experiments since most of the proteins and nutrients essential for cell survival are readily diffusible in hydrogel; (3) it is capable of applying chemical stimuli independently of mechanical stimuli; (4) it is straightforward to make, and requires very basic tools that are commonly available in biological labs. This device will also be useful in controlling the chemical and mechanical environment during the formation of tissue engineered constructs.

[1]  E. Butcher,et al.  T cell chemotaxis in a simple microfluidic device. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[2]  Albert Folch,et al.  Measurement of cell migration in response to an evolving radial chemokine gradient triggered by a microvalve. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[3]  Dragos Amarie,et al.  Chemotaxis assays of mouse sperm on microfluidic devices. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  Olivier Pertz,et al.  Neutrophil polarization: spatiotemporal dynamics of RhoA activity support a self-organizing mechanism. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Shuler,et al.  A three-channel microfluidic device for generating static linear gradients and its application to the quantitative analysis of bacterial chemotaxis. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[6]  David J Beebe,et al.  Characterization of a membrane-based gradient generator for use in cell-signaling studies. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[7]  Mehmet Toner,et al.  Microfluidic system for measuring neutrophil migratory responses to fast switches of chemical gradients. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[8]  Shu Chien,et al.  Biochemistry and biomechanics of cell motility. , 2005, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[9]  J. Wikswo,et al.  Effects of flow and diffusion on chemotaxis studies in a microfabricated gradient generator. , 2005, Lab on a chip.

[10]  G. Wadhams,et al.  Making sense of it all: bacterial chemotaxis , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[11]  Victor Sourjik,et al.  Receptor clustering and signal processing in E. coli chemotaxis. , 2004, Trends in microbiology.

[12]  P. Devreotes,et al.  Chemotaxis: signalling the way forward , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[13]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Micropatterned agarose gels for stamping arrays of proteins and gradients of proteins , 2004, Proteomics.

[14]  H. Mao,et al.  A sensitive, versatile microfluidic assay for bacterial chemotaxis , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Bryan Heit,et al.  Measuring Chemotaxis and Chemokinesis: The Under-Agarose Cell Migration Assay , 2003, Science's STKE.

[16]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Neutrophil chemotaxis in linear and complex gradients of interleukin-8 formed in a microfabricated device , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  J W Sedat,et al.  Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. , 2000, Science.

[18]  S. Khan,et al.  Response tuning in bacterial chemotaxis. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  C. Parent,et al.  A cell's sense of direction. , 1999, Science.

[20]  D Zicha,et al.  A new direct-viewing chemotaxis chamber. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[21]  T. Howard,et al.  Actin polymerization and its relationship to locomotion and chemokinetic response in maturing human promyelocytic leukemia cells. , 1987, Blood.

[22]  H. Berg.  Random Walks in Biology , 2018 .

[23]  A. Deisseroth,et al.  Development of chemotactic responsiveness in myeloid precursor cells: studies with a human leukemia cell line. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  S. Collins,et al.  Terminal differentiation of human promyelocytic leukemia cells induced by dimethyl sulfoxide and other polar compounds. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Zigmond Sh.  Ability of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to orient in gradients of chemotactic factors. , 1977 .

[26]  H. Berg.  Chemotaxis in bacteria. , 1975, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[27]  M. A. Lauffer,et al.  Diffusion measurements in agar gel. , 1962, Biochemistry.

[28]  S. Boyden.  THE CHEMOTACTIC EFFECT OF MIXTURES OF ANTIBODY AND ANTIGEN ON POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUCOCYTES , 1962, The Journal of experimental medicine.