Team development: A true field experiment at three levels of rigor.

[1]  D. Eden.  OD and Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Boosting Productivity by Raising Expectations , 1986 .

[2]  Samuel B. Pond,et al.  Research Issues in OD Evaluation: Past, Present, and Future , 1983 .

[3]  B. Bass.  Issues involved in relations between methodological rigor and reported outcomes in evaluations of organizational development. , 1983 .

[4]  David E. Terpstra,et al.  Relationship between methodological rigor and reported outcomes in organization development evaluation research. , 1981 .

[5]  S. Liebowitz,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Team-Building Research , 1981 .

[6]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Inner Contradictions of Rigorous Research. , 1984 .

[7]  R. Woodman,et al.  The role of team development in organizational effectiveness: A critical review. , 1980 .

[8]  R. Woodman,et al.  Effects of Team Development Intervention: A Field Experiment , 1980 .

[9]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[10]  Jerry I. Porras,et al.  Evaluation Methodology in Organization Development: An Analysis and Critique , 1978 .

[11]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Organization Development: A Review of Research Content and Research Design , 1976 .

[12]  D Eden,et al.  Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  M. Evans.  Failures in OD programs—What went wrong? , 1974 .

[14]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Survey of Organizations; A Machine-Scored Standardized Questionnaire Instrument , 1972 .

[15]  David G. Bowers,et al.  Predicting Organizational Effectiveness with a Four-Factor Theory of Leadership , 1966 .

[16]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .