Electrophysiological findings in patients with isolated veins after cryoablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS The main cause of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation is pulmonary vein reconnection. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyse the electophysiological findings in patients undergoing repeat procedures after an index cryoballoon ablation (CB-A) and presenting with permanency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in all veins. In addition, we sought to compare the latter with a similar group of patients with reconnected veins at the redo procedure. METHODS A total of 132 patients (81 men, 60.7 ± 12.4 years) who underwent CB-A for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) were enrolled. Indication for the redo procedure was symptomatic PAF in 83 (63%), persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) in 32 (24%) or persistent regular atrial tachycardia (RAT) in 17 (13%) patients. RESULTS Seventy-five (57%) patients presented a pulmonary vein reconnection (pulmonary vein group) during the redo procedure, whereas 57 (43%) had no pulmonary vein reconnection (non-pulmonary vein group). The non-pulmonary vein group exhibited significantly more non-pulmonary vein foci and atrial flutters than the pulmonary vein group after induction protocol (51 vs. 24%, P = 0.002 and 67 vs. 36%, P = 0.003, respectively). Twenty-two (29.3%) patients of the pulmonary vein group and 20 (35%) patients of the non-pulmonary vein group had atrial fibrillation/RAT recurrence after a mean follow-up of 12.5 ± 8 months. The survival analysis demonstrated no statistical significance in recurrence between both groups (log rank P = 0.358). CONCLUSION Atrial fibrillation/RAT recurrence in patients after CB-A with durable PVI is significantly associated with non-pulmonary vein foci and atrial flutters. No statistically different success rate regarding atrial fibrillation/RAT freedom was detected between the pulmonary vein and non-pulmonary vein groups after redoing RF-CA.

[1]  P. Brugada,et al.  Safety and feasibility of electrical isolation of the superior vena cava in addition to pulmonary vein ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation using the cryoballoon: lessons from a prospective study , 2020, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[2]  H. Crijns,et al.  Long-term outcomes of cryoballoon-based left atrial appendage isolation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation. , 2019, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[3]  C. Hamm,et al.  Left atrial roof ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon: benefit or wasted time? , 2019, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[4]  K. Hirao,et al.  Differences in the electrophysiological findings of repeat ablation between patients who first underwent cryoballoon ablation and radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[5]  J. Wójcik,et al.  Second‐generation cryoballoon ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation after an index procedure with radiofrequency versus cryo: Different pulmonary vein reconnection patterns but similar long‐term outcome—Results of a multicenter analysis , 2019, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  T. Chao,et al.  The importance of extrapulmonary vein triggers and atypical atrial flutter in atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoablation: Insights from repeat ablation procedures , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[7]  P. O’Neill,et al.  Posterior wall isolation using the cryoballoon in conjunction with pulmonary vein ablation is superior to pulmonary vein isolation alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: A multicenter experience. , 2018, Heart rhythm.

[8]  G. Suzuki,et al.  A relation between ablation area and outcome of ablation using 28‐mm cryoballon ablation: Importance of carina region , 2018, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[9]  P. Brugada,et al.  Clinical value of induction protocol after second generation cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation , 2018, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[10]  M. Chung,et al.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[11]  K. Chun,et al.  Electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage by Maze‐like catheter substrate modification: A reproducible strategy for pulmonary vein isolation nonresponders? , 2017, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[12]  M. Chung,et al.  2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation , 2017, Heart rhythm.

[13]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[14]  P. Kirchhof,et al.  2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. , 2016, European heart journal.

[15]  G. Wells,et al.  Relationship Between Pulmonary Vein Reconnection and Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2016, JACC. Clinical electrophysiology.

[16]  P. O’Neill,et al.  Pulmonary vein reconnection following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: results of a multicenter analysis , 2016, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[17]  H. Hachiya,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of the Isolation Area During the Chronic Phase After a 28-mm Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation Demarcated by High-Resolution Electroanatomic Mapping , 2016, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[18]  M. La Meir,et al.  Pericardial adhesions as a consequence of cryoballoon ablation detected during the hybrid AF ablation procedure , 2015, HeartRhythm case reports.

[19]  B. Schmidt,et al.  High rate of durable pulmonary vein isolation after second-generation cryoballoon ablation: analysis of repeat procedures. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  P. Neužil,et al.  Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Cryoballoon Ablation: Results from the Sustained PV Isolation with Arctic Front Advance (SUPIR) Study , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[21]  K. Ellenbogen,et al.  Quantification of the cryoablation zone demarcated by pre- and postprocedural electroanatomic mapping in patients with atrial fibrillation using the 28-mm second-generation cryoballoon. , 2015, Heart rhythm.

[22]  P. Brugada,et al.  Pericardial effusion in atrial fibrillation ablation: a comparison between cryoballoon and radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. , 2010, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[23]  P. Neužil,et al.  The Permanency of Pulmonary Vein Isolation Using a Balloon Cryoablation Catheter , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[24]  P. Brugada,et al.  Electrophysiological findings following pulmonary vein isolation using radiofrequency catheter guided by contact-force and second-generation cryoballoon: lessons from repeat ablation procedures. , 2016, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.