Many Pathways in Laboratory Evolution Can Lead to Improved Enzymes: How to Escape from Local Minima

Directed evolution is a method to tune the properties of enzymes for use in organic chemistry and biotechnology, to study enzyme mechanisms, and to shed light on Darwinian evolution in nature. In order to enhance its efficacy, iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) was implemented. This involves: 1) randomized mutation of appropriate sites of one or more residues; 2) screening of the initial mutant libraries for properties such as enzymatic rate, stereoselectivity, or thermal robustness; 3) use of the best hit in a given library as a template for saturation mutagenesis at the other sites; and 4) continuation of the process until the desired degree of enzyme improvement has been reached. Despite the success of a number of ISM‐based studies, the question of the optimal choice of the many different possible pathways remains unanswered. Here we considered a complete 4‐site ISM scheme. All 24 pathways were systematically explored, with the epoxide hydrolase from Aspergillus niger as the catalyst in the stereoselective hydrolytic kinetic resolution of a chiral epoxide. All 24 pathways were found to provide improved mutants with notably enhanced stereoselectivity. When a library failed to contain any hits, non‐improved or even inferior mutants were used as templates in the continuation of the evolutionary pathway, thereby escaping from the local minimum. These observations have ramifications for directed evolution in general and for evolutionary biological studies in which protein engineering techniques are applied.

[1]  M. Reetz,et al.  Directed Evolution of an Enantioselective Enoate-Reductase: Testing the Utility of Iterative Saturation Mutagenesis , 2009 .

[2]  Nigel F. Delaney,et al.  Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins , 2006, Science.

[3]  Philip A. Romero,et al.  Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution , 2009, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[4]  Yosephine Gumulya,et al.  Iterative saturation mutagenesis accelerates laboratory evolution of enzyme stereoselectivity: rigorous comparison with traditional methods. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  H. Leemhuis,et al.  Conversion of a cyclodextrin glucanotransferase into an alpha-amylase , 2018 .

[6]  Zhanglin Lin,et al.  Altering coenzyme specificity of Pichia stipitis xylose reductase by the semi-rational approach CASTing , 2007, Microbial cell factories.

[7]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Protein engineers turned evolutionists , 2007, Nature Methods.

[8]  Jan Marienhagen,et al.  Advances in generating functional diversity for directed protein evolution. , 2009, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[9]  Mats Holmquist,et al.  Focusing mutations into the P. fluorescens esterase binding site increases enantioselectivity more effectively than distant mutations. , 2005, Chemistry & biology.

[10]  Linda G. Otten,et al.  Enzyme engineering for enantioselectivity: from trial-and-error to rational design? , 2010, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  Robert T. Pennock,et al.  The evolutionary origin of complex features , 2003, Nature.

[12]  V. Eijsink,et al.  Directed evolution of enzyme stability. , 2005, Biomolecular engineering.

[13]  D. J. Kiviet,et al.  Empirical fitness landscapes reveal accessible evolutionary paths , 2007, Nature.

[14]  F. Oesch,et al.  Structure of Aspergillus niger epoxide hydrolase at 1.8 A resolution: implications for the structure and function of the mammalian microsomal class of epoxide hydrolases. , 2000, Structure.

[15]  Uwe T Bornscheuer,et al.  Finding better protein engineering strategies. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[16]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Addressing the Numbers Problem in Directed Evolution , 2008, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[17]  Dan S. Tawfik,et al.  Advances in laboratory evolution of enzymes. , 2008, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[18]  Wim Soetaert,et al.  Creating lactose phosphorylase enzymes by directed evolution of cellobiose phosphorylase. , 2009, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[19]  B. Pletschke,et al.  Stabilization of Escherichia coli uridine phosphorylase by evolution and immobilization , 2011 .

[20]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Constructing and Analyzing the Fitness Landscape of an Experimental Evolutionary Process , 2008, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[21]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Directed evolution of an enantioselective epoxide hydrolase: uncovering the source of enantioselectivity at each evolutionary stage. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[22]  Bernhard Hauer,et al.  Structure-guided directed evolution of alkenyl and arylmalonate decarboxylases. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  Gjalt W Huisman,et al.  Enzyme optimization: moving from blind evolution to statistical exploration of sequence-function space. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[24]  J. M. Broering,et al.  Established and novel tools to investigate biocatalyst stability , 2005 .

[25]  I. Alfonso,et al.  Asymmetric organic synthesis with enzymes , 2008 .

[26]  C. Ó’Fágáin Enzyme stabilization: recent experimental progress , 2003 .

[27]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Manipulating the stereoselectivity of limonene epoxide hydrolase by directed evolution based on iterative saturation mutagenesis. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[28]  S. Kurtovic,et al.  Functionally diverging molecular quasi-species evolve by crossing two enzymes. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  Huimin Zhao,et al.  Directed evolution of enzymes and biosynthetic pathways. , 2006, Current opinion in microbiology.

[30]  M. Reetz,et al.  Revisiting the lipase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa: directed evolution of substrate acceptance and enantioselectivity using iterative saturation mutagenesis. , 2011, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[31]  S. Kurtovic,et al.  Identification of emerging quasi-species in directed enzyme evolution. , 2009, Biochemistry.

[32]  Nicholas J Turner,et al.  Directed evolution drives the next generation of biocatalysts. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[33]  M. DePristo The subtle benefits of being promiscuous: Adaptive evolution potentiated by enzyme promiscuity , 2007, HFSP journal.

[34]  J. Bäckvall,et al.  Directed evolution of an enantioselective lipase with broad substrate scope for hydrolysis of alpha-substituted esters. , 2010, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[35]  Kenji Miyamoto,et al.  Dramatically improved catalytic activity of an artificial (S)-selective arylmalonate decarboxylase by structure-guided directed evolution. , 2011, Chemical communications.

[36]  M. Eigen,et al.  Molecular quasi-species. , 1988 .

[37]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  A genetic selection system for evolving enantioselectivity of enzymes. , 2008, Chemical communications.

[38]  J. Bäckvall,et al.  Combinatorial reshaping of the Candida antarctica lipase A substrate pocket for enantioselectivity using an extremely condensed library , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  I. Matsumura,et al.  Site-saturation mutagenesis is more efficient than DNA shuffling for the directed evolution of beta-fucosidase from beta-galactosidase. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Iterative saturation mutagenesis (ISM) for rapid directed evolution of functional enzymes , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[41]  M. T. Reetz,et al.  Gerichtete Evolution eines enantioselektiven Enzyms durch kombinatorische multiple Kassetten‐Mutagenese , 2001 .

[42]  B. Mannervik,et al.  Engineering GST M2-2 for high activity with indene 1,2-oxide and indication of an H-site residue sustaining catalytic promiscuity. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  Wayne M Patrick,et al.  Novel methods for directed evolution of enzymes: quality, not quantity. , 2004, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[44]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Shedding light on the efficacy of laboratory evolution based on iterative saturation mutagenesis. , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[45]  T. Oshima Stabilization of proteins by evolutionary molecular engineering techniques , 1994 .

[46]  Andreas Vogel,et al.  Expanding the range of substrate acceptance of enzymes: combinatorial active-site saturation test. , 2005, Angewandte Chemie.

[47]  W. Stemmer Rapid evolution of a protein in vitro by DNA shuffling , 1994, Nature.

[48]  K. Gruber,et al.  Inverting enantioselectivity of Burkholderia gladioli esterase EstB by directed and designed evolution. , 2007, Journal of biotechnology.

[49]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes: iterative cycles of CASTing for probing protein-sequence space. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[50]  F. Arnold,et al.  Temperature adaptation of enzymes: lessons from laboratory evolution. , 2000, Advances in protein chemistry.

[51]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Greatly reduced amino acid alphabets in directed evolution: making the right choice for saturation mutagenesis at homologous enzyme positions. , 2008, Chemical communications.

[52]  Manfred T Reetz,et al.  Laboratory evolution of stereoselective enzymes: a prolific source of catalysts for asymmetric reactions. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[53]  Manfred T. Reetz,et al.  Directed Evolution of an Enantioselective Enzyme through Combinatorial Multiple-Cassette Mutagenesis. , 2001, Angewandte Chemie.

[54]  Donald Hilvert,et al.  An Active Enzyme Constructed from a 9-Amino Acid Alphabet* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[55]  Andreas S Bommarius,et al.  Status of protein engineering for biocatalysts: how to design an industrially useful biocatalyst. , 2011, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[56]  D. Hilvert,et al.  Protein design by directed evolution. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[57]  Junhua Tao,et al.  Biocatalysis for the Pharmaceutical Industry , 2009 .

[58]  Walter Thiel,et al.  Learning from Directed Evolution: Further Lessons from Theoretical Investigations into Cooperative Mutations in Lipase Enantioselectivity , 2007, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[59]  A. Mesecar,et al.  Structure-based and random mutagenesis approaches increase the organophosphate-degrading activity of a phosphotriesterase homologue from Deinococcus radiodurans. , 2009, Journal of molecular biology.

[60]  M. Bhuiya,et al.  Engineering Monolignol 4-O-Methyltransferases to Modulate Lignin Biosynthesis* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[61]  M. T. Reetz Gerichtete Evolution stereoselektiver Enzyme: Eine ergiebige Katalysator-Quelle f r asymmetrische Reaktionen , 2011 .

[62]  Yuval Nov,et al.  When Second Best Is Good Enough: Another Probabilistic Look at Saturation Mutagenesis , 2011, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[63]  Tjaard Pijning,et al.  A Novel Genetic Selection System for Improved Enantioselectivity of Bacillus subtilis Lipase A , 2008, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[64]  Karlheinz Drauz,et al.  Enzyme Catalysis in Organic Synthesis: A Comprehensive Handbook: Vol. 1 J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 11340 , 1997 .

[65]  Manfred T. Reetz,et al.  Enhancing the Thermal Robustness of an Enzyme by Directed Evolution: Least Favorable Starting Points and Inferior Mutants Can Map Superior Evolutionary Pathways , 2011, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[66]  R. Lenski,et al.  Negative Epistasis Between Beneficial Mutations in an Evolving Bacterial Population , 2011, Science.