Rules for Comprehensible Technical Prose: A Survey of the Psycholinguistic Literature.

Abstract : Computerized systems that provide feedback on the comprehensibility of technical prose should be based on what is known scientifically about what makes prose difficult to understand. The experimental psycholinguistics literature was surveyed, and a set of rules for comprehensible technical prose was derived. The basic criteria for selection of the literature and the rules was that the rules should be applicable by an automatic system without needing deep knowledge of the domain. Rather, the rules should address the surface structure of sentences and text, and the semantic content at a 'shallow' level, defined in terms of the propositional representation for the text content. Many rules for good sentence syntax, coherence, text organization, and amount of content are proposed and justified by the experimental literature. THe major gaps in the empirical literature are described in a concluding section. Keywords: Readability; Documentation.

[1]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[2]  E. Howe.  Transformation, associative uncertainty, and free recall of sentences , 1970 .

[3]  L M Reder,et al.  Effects of spacing and embellishment on memory for the main points of a text , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[4]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: Effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recal , 1978 .

[5]  C. T. James.  Theme and imagery in the recall of active and passive sentences , 1972 .

[6]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Storage of Complex Information in Memory: Some Implications of the Speed with which Inferences Can be Made. , 1972 .

[7]  Thomas G. Bever,et al.  Immediate memory for words from main and subordinate clauses at different age levels , 1979 .

[8]  H. Mar,et al.  Encoding processes and the recall of text , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[9]  F. R. Yekovich,et al.  The Role of Presupposed and Focal Information in Integrating Sentences , 1979 .

[10]  D. Hakes.  Does verb structure affect sentence comprehension? , 1971 .

[11]  David E. Kieras,et al.  Thematic Processes in the Comprehension of Technical Prose. , 1982 .

[12]  Susan R. Goldman,et al.  Thematization and sentence retrieval , 1974 .

[13]  George Kellas,et al.  Phrase versus base structure effects on short-term retention , 1971 .

[14]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Readability and recall of short prose passages: A theoretical analysis. , 1980 .

[15]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Memory for syntactic form as a function of semantic context , 1974 .

[16]  L. Manelis,et al.  Accessing integrated and nonintegrated propositional structures in memory , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[17]  D. J. Foss,et al.  Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface structure reconsidered , 1970 .

[18]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  Hierarchical chunking in sentence processing , 1970 .

[19]  C. T. James,et al.  Recognition memory for active and passive sentences , 1977 .

[20]  J. Fodor,et al.  Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity , 1967 .

[21]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Capturing Readers' Attention by Means of Typographical Cuing Strategies. , 1978 .

[22]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  Comprehension and recall of text as a function of content variables , 1975 .

[23]  D. J. Foss.  Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times , 1969 .

[24]  J. Fodor,et al.  Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity, II : Verb structure , 1968 .

[25]  R. Jarvella.  Syntactic processing of connected speech , 1971 .

[26]  Kelyn H. Roberts.  Grammatical and associative constraints in sentence retention , 1968 .

[27]  D. Kieras.  Component processes in the comprehension of simple prose , 1981 .

[28]  H. Savin,et al.  Grammatical structure and the immediate recall of english sentences , 1965 .

[29]  Dan I. Slobin,et al.  Recall of full and truncated passive sentences in connected discourse , 1968 .

[30]  Simon Garrod,et al.  Interpreting anaphoric relations: The integration of semantic information while reading. , 1977 .

[31]  Thomas N. Huckin,et al.  English for Science and Technology: A Handbook for Nonnative Speakers , 1983 .

[32]  R. Rommetveit,et al.  Focus of attention in recall of active and passive sentences , 1968 .

[33]  A. Wearing.  The storage of complex sentences , 1970 .

[34]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  The verification of sentences: The effects of delay of evidence and sentence length , 1966 .

[35]  C. Schultz,et al.  Passage organization and imposed learning strategies in comprehension and recall of connected discourse , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[36]  H. H. Clark,et al.  In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .

[37]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Structural components of reading time , 1980 .

[38]  Edwin Martin,et al.  Grammatical factors in sentence retention , 1966 .

[39]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Click location and syntactic structure , 1972 .

[40]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Control of prose processing via instructional and typographical cues. , 1979 .

[41]  C. Waryas,et al.  On the preferred form of the double object construction , 1974 .

[42]  Shawn M. Glynn,et al.  Outline and Hierarchical Organization as Aids for Study and Retrieval. , 1977 .

[43]  E. Kozminsky,et al.  Altering comprehension: The effect of biasing titles on text comprehension , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[44]  M A Just,et al.  The relation between comprehending and remembering some complex sentences , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[45]  R. Jarvella,et al.  Clause structure of sentences and speech processing , 1972 .

[46]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Spatial Descriptions and Referential Continuity , 1982 .

[47]  Gail McKoon,et al.  Organization of Information in Text Memory. , 1977 .

[48]  C. Perfetti.  Sentence retention and the depth hypothesis , 1969 .

[49]  Jacques Mehler,et al.  Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences , 1967 .

[50]  Lawrence E. Marks,et al.  Scaling of grammaticalness of self-embedded English sentences , 1968 .

[51]  J. Fodor,et al.  The active use of grammar in speech perception , 1966 .

[52]  Murray Singer,et al.  Processes of inference during sentence encoding , 1979 .

[53]  de Villiers,et al.  Imagery and theme in recall of connected discourse. , 1974 .

[54]  Ernst Z. Rothkopf,et al.  Learning from written sentences: Within-sentence order in the acquisition of name-clause equivalences , 1963 .

[55]  G. Miller.  Some psychological studies of grammar. , 1962 .

[56]  David E. Kieras,et al.  The role of major referents and sentence topics in the construction of passage macrostructure , 1981 .

[57]  Val Ann Morris,et al.  Sentence comprehension, grammatical transformations and response availability , 1968 .

[58]  Kenneth I. Forster,et al.  Perceiving the Structure and Meaning of Sentences. , 1971 .

[59]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  RECONSTRUCTIVE RECALL IN SENTENCES WITH ALTERNATIVE SURFACE STRUCTURES , 1974 .

[60]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Some effects of memory limitation upon sentence comprehension and recall , 1970 .

[61]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Falsification of the hypothesis that word frequency is a unified variable in sentence processing , 1971 .

[62]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Comprehension of Instructions for Operating Devices. , 1984 .

[63]  V. M. Holmes.  Order of Main and Subordinate Clauses in Sentence Perception. , 1973 .

[64]  D E Kieras.  The Potential for Advanced Computerized Aids for Comprehensible Writing of Technical Documents. , 1985 .

[65]  Marcel Adam Just,et al.  Comprehension of negation with quantification , 1971 .

[66]  P. Dixon.  Plans and Written Directions for Complex Tasks. , 1982 .

[67]  M. McDaniel,et al.  Syntactic complexity and elaborative processing , 1981, Memory & cognition.

[68]  David E Kieras.  The Relation of Topics and Themes in Naturally Occurring Technical Paragraphs. , 1979 .

[69]  David E. Kieras.  Improving the Comprehensibility of a Simulated Technical Manual. , 1985 .

[70]  Robert A. Wisher,et al.  The Effects of Syntactic Expectations During Reading. , 1976 .

[71]  V. M. Holmes,et al.  Perceptual Complexity and Underlying Sentence Structure , 1972 .

[72]  Donald J. Foss,et al.  Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surf ace structure on decision times , 1969 .

[73]  J. Mehler.  Some effects of grammatical transformations on the recall of english sentences , 1963 .

[74]  George A. Miller,et al.  A Chronometric Study of Some Relations between Sentences , 1964 .

[75]  Mark A. Sherman,et al.  Adjectival Negation and the Comprehension of Multiply Negated Sentences. , 1976 .

[76]  Rumjahn Hoosain,et al.  The processing and remembering of congruent and incongruent sentences , 1974 .

[77]  Frank R. Yekovich,et al.  Identifying and using referents in sentence comprehension , 1978 .

[78]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall , 1972 .

[79]  R Baird,et al.  Recall of grammatical relations within clause-containing sentences , 1974, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[80]  James Deese,et al.  The Process of Understanding and Judgments of Comprehensibility. , 1970 .

[81]  R. Jarvella.  Effects of syntax on running memory span d for connected discourse , 1970 .

[82]  Bruce K. Britton,et al.  Effects of the Organization of Text on Memory: Tests of Retrieval and Response Criterion Hypotheses. , 1980 .

[83]  D. Kieras.  Initial mention as a signal to thematic content in technical passages , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[84]  L. T. Frase.  Integration of Written Text. , 1973 .

[85]  David T. Hakes.  Effects of reducing complement constructions on sentence comprehension , 1972 .

[86]  C. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse functions of thematization and topicalization , 1975 .

[87]  W. Kintsch.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[88]  L. Harris,et al.  Spatial direction and grammatical form of instructions affect the solution of spatial problems , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[89]  J. S. Evans,et al.  Understanding sentences with relative clauses , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[90]  M. Braine,et al.  Short-term memory limitations on decoding self-embedded sentences , 1974 .

[91]  M. Singer,et al.  Thematic Structure and the Integration of Linguistic Information. , 1976 .

[92]  Allan Collins,et al.  Short-term memory for sentences , 1968 .

[93]  J. L. Mistler-Lachman.  Levels of comprehension in processing of normal and ambiguous sentences , 1972 .

[94]  Marilyn D. Wang.  The role of syntactic complexity as a determiner of comprehensibility , 1970 .

[95]  Leon Manelis,et al.  Repetitions of propositional arguments in sentences , 1976 .

[96]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Some psychological relations between action and language structure , 1978, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[97]  J. L. Mistler-Lachman.  Queer sentences, ambiguity, and levels of processing , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[98]  J. Fodor,et al.  The psychological reality of linguistic segments , 1965 .

[99]  D. Hakes,et al.  Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns , 1970 .

[100]  Leon Manelis,et al.  Determinants of processing for a propositional structure , 1980 .

[101]  Peter Herriot,et al.  The comprehension of active and passive sentences as a function of pragmatic expectations , 1969 .

[102]  C. Perfetti.  Lexical density and phrase structure depth as variables in sentence retention , 1969 .

[103]  Carol A. Vazquez,et al.  Sentence processing: Evidence against the serial, independent stage assumption , 1981 .

[104]  Alan M. Lesgold,et al.  Pronominalization: A device for unifying sentences in memory , 1972 .

[105]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  Grammatical transformations and speed of understanding , 1965 .

[106]  M. Garrett,et al.  The interaction of perceptual processes and ambiguous sentences , 1973, Memory & cognition.

[107]  Neal F. Johnson,et al.  The influence of grammatical units on learning , 1968 .

[108]  Robert A. Boakes,et al.  Prompted recall of sentences , 1967 .

[109]  Amy Sheldon.  On strategies for processing relative clauses: A comparison of children and adults , 1977 .

[110]  J. Deese,et al.  Comprehensibility and Subject-Verb Relations in Complex Sentences. , 1971 .

[111]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Generation of active and passive sentences as a function of subject or object focus , 1968 .

[112]  Davin Caplan.  Clause boundaries and recognition latencies for words in sentences , 1972 .

[113]  Marily Ford,et al.  A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences , 1983 .

[114]  D. J. Foss.  Some effects of ambiguity upon sentence comprehension , 1970 .

[115]  D. Slobin.  Grammatical transformations and sentence comprehension in childhood and adulthood , 1966 .