The goal of our study was to evaluate whether the combination of remifentanil and propofol facilitated shorter recovery time and decreased charges compared with conventional balanced anesthesia. We studied 49 patients, aged 13 to 75 years, who underwent elective outpatient surgery. All data were analyzed using the Pearson chi2 and the Student t test; results were considered statistically significant at a P value of.05 or less. Group 1 received a remifentanil-propofol combination and group 2, a conventional balanced anesthetic. Group 1 had decreased mean operating room (dollar 280.83 vs dollar 337.42; P = .05) and operating room plus postanesthesia care unit (PACU) (dollar 442.67 vs dollar 544.62) charges (P = .02). Group 1 had less PACU time (48.26 vs 59.62 minutes) and 2 group 1 patients bypassed the PACU. We conclude that a remifentanil-propofol combination is more cost effective than conventional balanced anesthetics and enables some patients to bypass the PACU, resulting in quicker discharge. Our findings have important implications for ambulatory surgery centers and office-based practices.
[1]
Erik Olofsen,et al.
Propofol Reduces Perioperative Remifentanil Requirements in a Synergistic Manner: Response Surface Modeling of Perioperative Remifentanil–Propofol Interactions
,
2003,
Anesthesiology.
[2]
M. Tramèr,et al.
Prevention of Pain on Injection with Propofol: A Quantitative Systematic Review
,
2000,
Anesthesia and analgesia.
[3]
J. Vuyk,et al.
Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions between opioids and propofol.
,
1997,
Journal of clinical anesthesia.
[4]
R. Miguel,et al.
A Multicenter Evaluation of Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Remifentanil and Propofol for Elective Inpatient Surgery
,
1996,
Anesthesia and analgesia.
[5]
T. Egan.
Remifentanil Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
,
1995,
Clinical pharmacokinetics.
[6]
Barbara B. Huff,et al.
PDR : physicians' desk reference
,
1953
.