Analysis of Royal Inquiry Report on the collapse of a building in Kuala Lumpur: Implications for developing countries

Purpose – Malaysia, which is in an intermediary phase of development and industrialization, has experienced various magnitudes of disasters ranging from biological, structural collapse, fires and explosions, landslides to meteorological incidents. The first major disaster that could be linked with the development of the country was the collapse of a four‐storey building in 1968. This article describes how, by applying a grounded theory approach, examination and analysis of archival data were conducted to identify the phases and latent errors of this landmark disaster.Design/methodology/approach – Grounded theory approach was utilized to develop a substantive theory of socio‐technical disaster preconditions.Findings – Data indicated that the disaster had developed in phases as found by other disaster scholars. Regulatory failures were found to be one of the main causes of the disaster. The disaster appeared to be an inevitable consequence of the inability of the laws and regulations to keep in tandem with ...

[1]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  A Human Error Approach to Accident Investigation: The Taxonomy of Unsafe Operations , 1997 .

[2]  L. Cronbach.  Beyond the Two Disciplines of Scientific Psychology. , 1975 .

[3]  David A. McEntire,et al.  Reflecting on the weaknesses of the international community during the IDNDR: some implications for research and its application , 1997 .

[4]  S. Merriam.  Case Study Research in Education , 1988 .

[5]  Victor Bignell.  Methods and Case Studies for Teaching and Learning about Failure and Safety , 1999 .

[6]  Simon Reynolds,et al.  Learning from Disasters: A Management Approach , 1997 .

[7]  Chris W. Johnson,et al.  Using Reason’s Model of Organisational Accidents in Formalising Accident Reports , 1999, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[8]  Barry Turner,et al.  The Development of Disasters—A Sequence Model for the Analysis of the Origins of Disasters , 1976 .

[9]  G. Drogaris.  Major Accident Reporting System: Lessons Learned from Accidents Notified , 1993 .

[10]  Mohamed Daud,et al.  Evolution of Emergency Management in Malaysia , 2001 .

[11]  D. McEntire.  Triggering agents, vulnerabilities and disaster reduction: towards a holistic paradigm , 2001 .

[12]  B. Turner.  Man Made Disasters , 1995 .

[13]  Hayim Granot,et al.  The dark side of growth and industrial disasters since the Second World War , 1998 .

[14]  Bill Richardson,et al.  Socio‐technical Disasters: Profile and Prevalence , 1994 .

[15]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[16]  E. Quarantelli.  Implications for Programmes and Policies From Future Disaster Trends , 1999 .

[17]  K. Weick.  The Vulnerable System: An Analysis of the Tenerife Air Disaster , 1990 .

[18]  A. Bryman.  Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[19]  L. Cronbach.  The two disciplines of scientific psychology. , 1957 .

[20]  D. E. Embrey,et al.  Incorporating management and organisational factors into probabilistic safety assessment , 1992 .

[21]  B. Bowonder.  Learning from the Bhopal accident , 1992 .

[22]  Aini Mat Said,et al.  Technological man‐made disaster precondition phase model for major accidents , 2002 .

[23]  D. L. Simms,et al.  Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies , 1986 .

[24]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[25]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[26]  Roscoe B. Hogan,et al.  Occupational safety and health act , 1977 .

[27]  Celia Wells.  Inquiring into Disasters: Law, Politics and Blame , 1999 .

[28]  J A Merchant.  Preparing for disaster. , 1986, American journal of public health.

[29]  B. Turner.  Causes of Disaster: Sloppy Management , 1994 .

[30]  Lars Clausen,et al.  Social differentiation and the long-term origin of disasters , 1992 .