This article suggests the need for rethinking the role that consumer perspectives will play (and ought to play) in the design and development of future augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) technologies. After carefully defining what they mean by “AAC consumers,” “consumer perspectives,” and “AAC technologies,” the authors consider the extent to which current research has illuminated our understanding of (1) how consumers view AAC technologies and (2) how consumers themselves would define future technology needs. It's not a pretty picture. While it is clear that there already exist specific constructs and methods that could enable researchers and developers to learn more about consumer perspectives, it is equally clear that few, if any, researchers make much use of these constructs and methods. The authors focus specifically on ways that consumer perspective can helpfully infuse participatory action research, technology transfer processes, and ergonomics. In addition, the authors consider how research that investigates the ways in which assistive technologies impact the daily lives of individuals with severe communication impairment also influences public policy issues, which can in turn affect future definitions of AAC technology needs. Throughout the article, the authors advocate for a paradigm shift in the quantity and quality of the collaborations that occur between AAC consumers and AAC researchers, manufacturers, and developers. Augmented communicators and their families have a major stake in all types of research that can affect the design and development of AAC devices and accessories, and the results of this research, in turn, can affect public policy decisions about AAC technologies. This makes it all the more important that AAC consumers be involved at each step of the research and development process.
[1]
Franklin H. Silverman,et al.
Communication for the speechless
,
1994
.
[2]
Carol M. Trivette,et al.
Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice
,
1988
.
[3]
Andrew Jinks,et al.
Consumer response to AAC devices: Acquisition, training, use, and satisfaction
,
1994
.
[4]
Desmond Ellis.
The wrong stuff
,
1987
.
[5]
D. Angelo.
Impact of augmentative and alternative communication devices on families
,
2000
.
[6]
Family Perspective on Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Families of Adolescents and Young Adults
,
1996
.
[7]
Mark Mizuko,et al.
Transparency and ease of learning of symbols represented by Blissymbols, PCS, and Picsyms
,
1987
.
[8]
Lisa B. Shore.
Enabling and Empowering Families: Principles and Guidelines for Practice
,
1997
.
[9]
Ann P. Turnbull,et al.
Families, Professionals, and Exceptionality: A Special Partnership
,
1986
.
[10]
Kari Krogh,et al.
Including people with disabilities in research: implications for the field of augmentative and alternative communication
,
1999
.
[11]
Marcia J. Scherer,et al.
Applying the Matching Person and Technology Evaluation Process
,
2001
.
[12]
Jan L. Bedrosian,et al.
Promoting acceptance of augmentative and alternative communication by adults with acquired communication disorders
,
2001
.
[13]
David R. Beukelman,et al.
Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Management of Severe Communication Disorders in Children and Adults
,
1995
.