Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of human thighs for developing complex dummy tissues

Wearable robots pose high risks to humans because they are directly mounted on human bodies, and methods for assessing their safety have not yet been established. For developing such safety tests, we have fabricated dummy legs that emulate the structure of the human body. Furthermore, all mechanical characteristics of human tissues that relate to their interactions with a wearable robot - elasticity, viscosity, normal stress, deformation, and friction coefficient - must be considered in parallel. Moreover, complex dummy tissues were developed and their characteristics were compared with those of human tissues. Mechanical characteristics of tissues for both humans and dummy were evaluated using a rheometer and an ultrasonic probe to clarify the similarities or differences. Consequently, we identified a mechanism of biological soft tissues as well as a way of imitating these characteristics in complex dummy tissues.

[1]  J.F. Greenleaf,et al.  Skin viscoelasticity with surface wave method , 2008, 2008 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium.

[2]  Yoshiyuki Sankai,et al.  Safety Issues on Power Assist Devices , 2011 .

[3]  Keijiro Yamamoto,et al.  Development of Power Assisting Suit , 2003 .

[4]  Bo Qiang,et al.  Quantitative assessment of scleroderma by surface wave technique. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  W A Akers,et al.  Measurements of friction injuries in man. , 1985, American journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  Francesco Giovacchini,et al.  Measuring human-robot interaction on wearable robots: A distributed approach , 2011 .

[7]  Osamu Osanai,et al.  Development of a novel method to measure the elastic properties of skin including subcutaneous tissue: New age‐related parameters and scope of application , 2008, Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging.

[8]  G. McKinley,et al.  Tribo-Rheometry: From Gap-Dependent Rheology to Tribology , 2004 .

[9]  K. Kwiatkowski,et al.  Friction and deformation behaviour of human skin , 2009 .

[10]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Material properties of commonly-used interface materials and their static coefficients of friction with skin and socks. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  M B Sulzberger,et al.  Studies on blisters produced by friction. II. The blister fluid. , 1968, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[12]  H. Oestreicher,et al.  Physics of vibrations in living tissues. , 1952, Journal of applied physiology.

[13]  Received March,et al.  In vivo skin friction measurements , 1977 .

[14]  Brian J. Briscoe,et al.  Friction and lubrication of human skin , 2007 .

[15]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  An atlas of physical human-robot interaction , 2008 .

[16]  S. E. Franklin,et al.  Influence of Surface Roughness, Material and Climate Conditions on the Friction of Human Skin , 2010 .

[17]  H. Suzuki,et al.  Development of a Muscle Suit for the Upper Limb Motion Support A New Shoulder Mechanism and Posture Measurement , 2006, 2006 World Automation Congress.

[18]  P. Naylor.  THE SKIN SURFACE AND FRICTION. , 1955, The British journal of dermatology.