Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center.

PURPOSE To prospectively assess the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on the interpretation of screening mammograms in a community breast center. MATERIALS AND METHODS Over a 12-month period, 12,860 screening mammograms were interpreted with the assistance of a CAD system. Each mammogram was initially interpreted without the assistance of CAD, followed immediately by a reevaluation of areas marked by the CAD system. Data were recorded to measure the effect of CAD on the recall rate, positive predictive value for biopsy, cancer detection rate, and stage of malignancies at detection. RESULTS When comparing the radiologist's performance without CAD with that when CAD was used, the authors observed the following: (a) an increase in recall rate from 6.5% to 7.7%, (b) no change in the positive predictive value for biopsy at 38%, (c) a 19.5% increase in the number of cancers detected, and (d) an increase in the proportion of early-stage (0 and I) malignancies detected from 73% to 78%. CONCLUSION The use of CAD in the interpretation of screening mammograms can increase the detection of early-stage malignancies without undue effect on the recall rate or positive predictive value for biopsy.

[1]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[2]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[3]  L. Fajardo,et al.  Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  M. Pamilo,et al.  Double reading of mammography screening films--one radiologist or two? , 1993, Clinical radiology.

[5]  Roland Holland,et al.  The current detectability of breast cancer in a mammographic screening program. A review of the previous mammograms of interval and screen‐detected cancers , 1993, Cancer.

[6]  C J Vyborny,et al.  Can computers help radiologists read mammograms? , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  J. M. Pruneda,et al.  Computer-aided mammographic screening for spiculated lesions. , 1994, Radiology.

[8]  E. Thurfjell,et al.  Benefit of independent double reading in a population-based mammography screening program. , 1994, Radiology.

[9]  M L Giger,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications: evaluation of performance on mammograms from multiple centers. , 1995, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[10]  G. P. Cohen,et al.  Characteristics of breast carcinomas missed by screening radiologists. , 1997, Radiology.

[11]  N Karssemeijer,et al.  Automated detection of breast carcinomas not detected in a screening program. , 1998, Radiology.

[12]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Proposition: All mammograms should be double-read. , 1999, Medical physics.

[13]  L. Tabár,et al.  Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. , 2000, Radiology.