Determination of geometrical factors in Layerwise Laser Melting using optical process monitoring

Abstract Layerwise Laser Melting (LLM) is a layerwise production technique enabling the production of complex metallic parts. In the process a thin layer of powder is first deposited on a base plate. With the energy of a scanning laser beam this layer is melted at selected places, according to a predefined scanning pattern. After scanning, a new layer of powder is deposited on top of the previous layer and selectively melted. This sequence of depositing and scanning is repeated until the complete part is built. The local geometry surrounding the melt pool has a large influence on the processing behavior. For process control issues, this influence must be known and quantified, in order to determine a priori optimal processing conditions and to interpret measured melt pool radiation. In order to study the melt pool behavior, optical process monitoring of LLM has been applied using a high speed near-infrared CMOS camera and a large area silicon photodiode sensor. Data processing rates up to 10 kHz and real-time process monitoring are achieved using image and signal processing on a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). Several case studies will be presented showing that the geometric influencing factors can be studied and quantified by analyzing the melt pool sensor output.

[1]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Direct Manufacturing of Metal Prototypes and Prototype Tools , 1996 .

[2]  J. Kruth,et al.  Feedback control of selective laser melting , 2007 .

[3]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Study of the wear Behaviour of Conventional and Rapid Tooling Mould Materials , 2005 .

[4]  Alexander Kaplan,et al.  Challenges to the interpretation of the electromagnetic feedback from laser welding , 2011 .

[5]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Experimental investigation of laser surface remelting for the improvement of selective laser melting process , 2008 .

[6]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Feedback control of Layerwise Laser Melting using optical sensors , 2010 .

[7]  Pietro Mario Lugarà,et al.  Real-time monitoring of laser welding by correlation analysis: The case of AA5083 , 2007 .

[8]  K. Osakada,et al.  The manufacturing of hard tools from metallic powders by selective laser melting , 2001 .

[9]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Study of Laser-Sinterability of Iron-based Powder Mixture , 2004 .

[10]  W. König,et al.  Modeling, Monitoring and Control in High Quality Laser Cutting , 2001 .

[11]  P. Mercelis Control of selective laser sintering and selective laser melting processes , 2007 .

[12]  Joost Duflou,et al.  On-line monitoring and process control in selective laser melting and laser cutting , 2007 .

[13]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Design and production of bone scaffolds with selective laser melting , 2009 .

[14]  Julian D. C. Jones,et al.  In-situ laser material process monitoring using a cladding power detection technique , 1993 .

[15]  Tom Craeghs,et al.  A pragmatic model for selective laser melting with evaporation , 2009 .

[16]  Klaus Behler,et al.  Practical applications of in-process monitoring for laser processes - Not only for single welds and common materials , 2004 .

[17]  F. Klocke,et al.  Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing , 2007 .

[18]  Reinhart Poprawe,et al.  Investigation on the direct laser metallic powder deposition process via temperature measurement , 2006 .

[19]  J. Kruth,et al.  Investigation on occurrence of elevated edges in Selective Laser Melting , 2009 .

[20]  J. Kruth,et al.  A study of the microstructural evolution during selective laser melting of Ti–6Al–4V , 2010 .

[21]  Yifu Shen,et al.  Balling phenomena in direct laser sintering of stainless steel powder: Metallurgical mechanisms and control methods , 2009 .

[22]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Closed loop direct metal deposition : art to part , 2000 .