Sensor Placement Optimization for SHM Systems Under Uncertainty

Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) systems that report in real-time a flight vehicle's condition are central to meeting the goals of increasing flight vehicle safety and reliability, while reducing operating and maintenance costs. The structural response of flight vehicles is inherently random, requiring deterministic finite element analyses to be augmented with uncertainty quantification methods to compute the response statistics and structural damage probability. To detect damage with maximum probability, sensors must be placed optimally. This requires combining a probabilistic finite element method (FEM) with damage detection algorithms and optimization techniques. This study develops a methodology to integrate the above disciplines into a sensor placement optimization (SPO) methodology for SHM systems under uncertainty. To achieve this, the structural component under consideration is analyzed via FEM and uncertainty of model input quantities is included in the analysis via random processes and fields. In the next two steps probabilistic FEM analyses are performed to determine the model output variability and using these results, damage detection procedures such as feature extraction and state classification are applied to assess the current structural state of the component. Repeating these two steps using both healthy and damaged structural models helps quantify the reliability of a given sensor layout. Finally, SPO is achieved to maximize the reliability of damage detection. The sensor layout design of a thermal protection system component is used as a numerical example.

[1]  Rex K. Kincaid,et al.  Aerospace Applications of Integer and Combinatorial Optimization , 1995 .

[2]  Harvey Thomas Banks,et al.  Real time computational algorithms for eddy current based damage detection , 2002 .

[3]  Jer-Nan Juang,et al.  Structural damage detection using virtual passive controllers , 2002 .

[4]  R. Ghanem,et al.  Polynomial chaos decomposition for the simulation of non-gaussian nonstationary stochastic processes , 2002 .

[5]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Reliability Assessment Using Stochastic Finite Element Analysis , 2000 .

[6]  L Padula Sharon,et al.  Optimal Sensor/Actuator Locations for Active Structural Acoustic Control , 1998 .

[7]  L Padula Sharon,et al.  Optimization Strategies for Sensor and Actuator Placement , 1999 .

[8]  Alexander Tessler,et al.  An Inverse Interpolation Method Utilizing In-Flight Strain Measurements for Determining Loads and Structural Response of Aerospace Vehicles , 2001 .

[9]  George Deodatis,et al.  Simulation of Highly Skewed Non-Gaussian Stochastic Processes , 2001 .

[10]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[11]  James L. Beck,et al.  Two-Stage System Identification Results for Benchmark Structure , 2000 .

[12]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  Damage identification and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: A literature review , 1996 .

[13]  Mark M. Derriso,et al.  Structural health monitoring experiments with a canonical element of an aerospace vehicle , 2003, 2003 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.03TH8652).

[14]  J. W. Tedesco,et al.  Structural Dynamics: Theory and Applications , 1998 .

[15]  James C. Spall,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF THE SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION METHOD FOR EFFICIENT OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .