SEATONOMY Design, development and validation of marine autonomous systems and operations

The SEATONOMY methodology provides a structured approach for design, development and validation of mobile autonomous maritime operations and systems. The goal is to achieve this by providing system developers of autonomous systems with suitable guidelines, principles, best practices and tools. The methodology encompasses three viewpoints: operational, system and verification & validation. Industrial use cases are used as both input to the methodology, as well as pilotcases for an iterative testing and development of the methodology. Keywords—marine; autonomous operations; industrial autonomous systems;

[1]  Ørnulf Jan Rødseth,et al.  Risk Assessment for an Unmanned Merchant Ship , 2015 .

[2]  Ornulf Jan Rodseth,et al.  A maritime ITS architecture for e-Navigation and e-Maritime: Supporting environment friendly ship transport , 2011, 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).

[3]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  Communication architecture for an unmanned merchant ship , 2013, 2013 MTS/IEEE OCEANS - Bergen.

[4]  Nsw Roads and Maritime Services Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) , 2016 .

[5]  Knut Grythe,et al.  Autonomy levels versus communication in an underwater environment , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - Genova.

[6]  Aksel A. Transeth,et al.  Robotics for the Petroleum Industry - Challenges and Opportunities , 2013 .

[7]  Thomas Porathe,et al.  Autonomous Unmanned Merchant Vessel and its Contribution towards the e-Navigation Implementation: The MUNIN Perspective , 2014 .

[8]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[9]  M. Vagia,et al.  Autonomous Job Analysis a method for design of autonomous marine operations , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - MTS/IEEE Washington.

[10]  A.K. Jonsson,et al.  Autonomy in Space Exploration: Current Capabilities and Future Challenges , 2007, 2007 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  Eva B. Thorstad,et al.  Escapes of fishes from Norwegian sea-cage aquaculture: causes, consequences and prevention. , 2010 .

[12]  Francis Y. Enomoto,et al.  UAV Autonomous Operations for Airborne Science Missions , 2004 .

[13]  Jon Rigelsford,et al.  Behaviour‐based Robotics , 2001 .