The Effects of Texting and Driving on Hazard Perception

Hazard perception has received little attention compared to measures of vehicle control in studies exploring the effects of texting on driving performance, despite being a more direct measure of crash risk. Furthermore, the driver strategies attempting to moderate such distraction are not well understood. The current study attempts to address these two facets of texting while driving. Participants (10 male; 10 female) drove a low fidelity simulator that measures situational awareness, while text messaging in order to assess hazard perception performance. Participants were required to identify and appropriately respond to events that would result in a collision. Two text message conditions (i.e., copying and alphabetizing a 5-letter string) were used to compare low vs. high cognitive load, respectively. Participants missed more hazards in the alphabetize-text compared to the copy-text and driving only conditions. Signal Detection Theory (SDT) analyses revealed the adoption of a more liberal response bias (B”) (i.e., participants increased false) when required to copy the text message but not when required to alphabetize. Last, participants were slower to react to hazards in the alphabetize-text condition compared to the copy-text and driving only conditions. These findings suggest that the impact of text messaging on the detection of driving hazards depends in part, on the cognitive load imposed by the text messaging task and the adoption of strategies to compensate for the interference on the driving task.

[1]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations , 2009 .

[2]  Frank Drews,et al.  Text Messaging During Simulated Driving , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Santokh Singh.  Distracted Driving and Driver, Roadway, and Environmental Factors , 2010 .

[4]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  A non-parametric analysis of recognition experiments , 1964 .

[5]  Jeremy D Sudweeks,et al.  Driver performance while text messaging using handheld and in-vehicle systems. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Daryl Fougnie,et al.  Executive working memory load induces inattentional blindness , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  F. McKenna,et al.  Drivers' hazard perception ability: Situation awareness on the road , 2004 .

[8]  Trent Victor,et al.  Distraction Assessment Methods Based on Visual Behavior and Event Detection , 2009 .

[9]  L. Gugerty.  Situation Awareness During Driving: Explicit and Implicit Knowledge in Dynamic Spatial Memory , 1997 .

[10]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The Effects of Text Messaging on Young Drivers , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Loren S. Groff,et al.  Maintaining Situational Awareness: The Role of Visual Attention , 1999 .

[12]  W. Donaldson.  Measuring recognition memory. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  C. Chabris,et al.  Gorillas in Our Midst: Sustained Inattentional Blindness for Dynamic Events , 1999, Perception.

[14]  J. Beck.  Organization and representation in perception , 1982 .

[15]  R. B. Post,et al.  The two modes of processing concept and some implications In J , 1982 .

[16]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  PROCEEDINGS of the HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS SOCIETY 48 th ANNUAL MEETING – 2004 FOCAL AND AMBIENT VISUAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND DRIVER VISUAL SCANNING IN LANE KEEPING AND HAZARD DETECTION , 2004 .