A Sphere Phantom Approach to Measure Directional Modulation Transfer Functions for Tomosynthesis Imaging Systems

We propose a sphere phantom approach to measure spatially varying directional modulation transfer functions (MTFs) for tomosynthesis imaging systems. Since the reconstructed tomosynthesis images contain significant artifacts, traditional background detrending techniques may not be effective to estimate the background trends accurately, which is essential to acquire sphere only data. A background detrending technique optimized for local volumes with different cone angles is presented. To measure directional MTFs, we calculate plane integrals of ideal sphere phantom and sphere only data. To minimize the effects of the high level of noise in tomosynthesis images, Richardson-Lucy deconvolution with Tikhonov-Miller is used to estimate directional plane spread function (PlSF). Then, directional MTFs are calculated by taking the modulus of the Fourier transform of the directional PlSFs. The measured directional MTFs are compared with the ideal directional MTFs calculated from a simulated point object. Our results show that the proposed method reliably measures directional MTFs along any desired directions, especially near low frequency regions.

[1]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Measurement of the spatial resolution of a clinical volumetric computed tomography scanner using a sphere phantom , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Jongduk Baek,et al.  Directional MTF measurement using sphere phantoms for a digital breast tomosynthesis system , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Otto Zhou,et al.  Stationary chest tomosynthesis using a carbon nanotube x-ray source array: a feasibility study , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  H. C. Kim,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: utility for detection of lung metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. , 2012, Clinical radiology.

[5]  W D McDavid,et al.  Pre-clinical evaluation of a new dental panoramic radiographic system based on tomosynthesis method. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[6]  Aruna A. Vedula,et al.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging. , 2006, Medical physics.

[7]  Ying Chen,et al.  Breast tomosynthesis imaging configuration optimization based on computer simulation , 2014, J. Electronic Imaging.

[8]  Baojun Li,et al.  Optimization of slice sensitivity profile for radiographic tomosynthesis. , 2007, Medical physics.

[9]  James T. Dobbins,et al.  Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[10]  Jongduk Baek,et al.  A New Method to Measure Directional Modulation Transfer Function Using Sphere Phantoms in a Cone Beam Computed Tomography System , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of an amorphous selenium digital mammography detector in a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2008, Medical physics.

[12]  Lingyun Chen,et al.  Spatial resolution properties in cone beam CT: a simulation study. , 2008, Medical physics.

[13]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Quantitative imaging in breast tomosynthesis and CT: comparison of detection and estimation task performance. , 2010, Medical physics.

[14]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Cascaded systems analysis of the 3D NEQ for cone-beam CT and tomosynthesis , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  Günter Lauritsch,et al.  Theoretical framework for filtered back projection in tomosynthesis , 1998, Medical Imaging.

[16]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Three-dimensional linear system analysis for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[17]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[18]  Thomas R. Overton,et al.  Image restoration in computed tomography: estimation of the spatially variant point spread function , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[19]  R. Ning,et al.  Three-dimensional point spread function measurement of cone-beam computed tomography system by iterative edge-blurring algorithm. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  G. Kicska,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis of the chest: current and emerging applications. , 2014, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[21]  Patrick C. Brennan,et al.  Effect of radiologists’ experience on breast cancer detection and localization using digital breast tomosynthesis , 2015, European Radiology.

[22]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[23]  James T Dobbins,et al.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  A. Flinck,et al.  Comparison of chest tomosynthesis and chest radiography for detection of pulmonary nodules: human observer study of clinical cases. , 2008, Radiology.

[25]  S. Rose,et al.  Implementation of breast tomosynthesis in a routine screening practice: an observational study. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  Bin Zheng,et al.  Characterization of a high-energy in-line phase contrast tomosynthesis prototype. , 2015, Medical physics.

[27]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: System and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms. , 2012, Medical physics.

[28]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Image artifacts in digital breast tomosynthesis: investigation of the effects of system geometry and reconstruction parameters using a linear system approach. , 2008, Medical physics.

[29]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Effect of Oblique X-ray Incidence in Flat-Panel Computed Tomography of the Breast , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  E Samei,et al.  Assessment of multi-directional MTF for breast tomosynthesis , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Michael J. Flynn,et al.  Spatial resolution of x-ray tomosynthesis in relation to computed tomography for coronal/sagittal images of the knee , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[32]  Bo Zhao,et al.  Optimization of Tomosynthesis Acquisition Parameters: Angular Range and Number of Projections , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[33]  Aldo Badano,et al.  Anisotropic imaging performance in breast tomosynthesis. , 2007, Medical physics.

[34]  J Y Vaishnav,et al.  Objective assessment of image quality and dose reduction in CT iterative reconstruction. , 2014, Medical physics.

[35]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Investigation of the Z-axis resolution of breast tomosynthesis mammography systems , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[36]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .

[37]  Baojun Li,et al.  Optimization of slice sensitivity profile for radiographic tomosynthesis. , 2007, Medical physics.

[38]  Erik Fredenberg,et al.  Physical characterization of photon-counting tomosynthesis , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[39]  Joachim Mühling,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis—experiences with a new imaging device for the dental field , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[40]  Ian Shaw,et al.  Design and performance of the prototype full field breast tomosynthesis system with selenium based flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[41]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Computed Tomography: Principles, Design, Artifacts, and Recent Advances, Fourth Edition , 2022 .

[42]  Van Kempen,et al.  The influence of the regularization parameter and the first estimate on the performance of tikhonov regularized non-linear image restoration algorithms , 2000 .

[43]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of volumetric noise and resolution performance for linear and nonlinear CT reconstruction methods. , 2014, Medical physics.

[44]  Bo Zhao,et al.  A computer simulation platform for the optimization of a breast tomosynthesis system. , 2007, Medical physics.

[45]  Haruhiko Machida,et al.  Optimizing parameters for flat-panel detector digital tomosynthesis. , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[46]  Takao Kuwabara,et al.  Physical performance testing of digital breast tomosynthesis , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[47]  Ying Chen,et al.  Methodology of NEQ (f) analysis for optimization and comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis acquisition techniques and reconstruction algorithms , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[48]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[49]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Comparison of patient specific dose metrics between chest radiography, tomosynthesis, and CT for adult patients of wide ranging body habitus. , 2014, Medical physics.

[50]  Van Kempen GM,et al.  The influence of the regularization parameter and the first estimate on the performance of tikhonov regularized non-linear image restoration algorithms , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[51]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology. , 2014, Medical physics.

[52]  Gopal B. Avinash,et al.  Characterization of point spread function in linear digital tomosynthesis: a simulation study , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[53]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Experimental validation of a three-dimensional linear system model for breast tomosynthesis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[54]  Tomohiro Okano,et al.  Diagnostic ability of extraoral tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT) for impacted third molars. , 2005, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[55]  Joseph Y. Lo,et al.  Digital breast tomosynthesis using an amorphous selenium flat panel detector , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[56]  Thomas Mertelmeier,et al.  Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.