The Analysis of Facio-Dental Proportions to Determine the Width of Maxillary Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study

The present study aimed to analyze mid horizontal facial third proportions, those being the interpupillary, inner intercanthal, and bizygomatic distance modified with golden proportion, The Preston proportion, golden percentage and 70% recurring esthetic dental proportion were used for determining maxillary anterior teeth width. A total of 230 participants took part in this study. The front dental and facial photographs along dental stone cast which were converted to three-dimensional (3D) models were used for evaluation. The mid horizontal facial third proportions showed no significant relationship with maxillary anterior teeth width without modification with dental proportions. Whereas, with modification, no statistically significant difference was found between inner-intercanthal distance by golden percentage and width of central incisors. The bizygomatic distance was greater than intercanine distance. While the interpupillary distance by golden proportion was found to be consistent with intercanine distance in female participants. The modified anterior teeth width was significantly different from measured values, when determined by using the three mid facial proportions with Preston and 70% recurring esthetic dental (RED) proportion. Furthermore, the measured width of maxillary anterior teeth showed no difference when plaster dental casts widths were compared with 3D models. The interpupillary, inner-intercanthal, and bizygomatic distance should not be directly used to determine maxillary anterior teeth width. While maxillary anterior teeth width can be determined by modifying the inner inter-canthal distance with golden percentage and interpupillary distance with golden proportion. Moreover, the midfacial third proportions modified with Preston and 70% recurrent esthetic dental proportion were found to be unreliable for the determination of maxillary anterior teeth widths.

[1]  L. Junquera,et al.  Analysis of dental esthetic proportions in a Spanish population sample. , 2021, Journal of oral science.

[2]  M. Alam,et al.  A 2D Photographic and 3D Digital Dental Model Analysis of Golden Percentage in Maxillary Anterior Teeth , 2021, BioMed research international.

[3]  P. Bawankar,et al.  Influence of facial index, facial profile, lip size, and angulations of teeth on gingival characteristics of anterior teeth: A gender-based evaluation. , 2020, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[4]  Comparing the Anthropometric Measurements as a Tool for Anterior Teeth Selection , 2020, Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development.

[5]  Rahul Kalia An analysis of the aesthetic proportions of anterior maxillary teeth in a UK population , 2020, British Dental Journal.

[6]  J. Ata-Ali,et al.  Evaluation of the maxillary midline, curve of the upper lip, smile line and tooth shape: a prospective study of 140 Caucasian patients , 2020, BMC Oral Health.

[7]  J. Godinho,et al.  Contribution of facial components to the attractiveness of the smiling face in male and female patients: A cross-sectional correlation study. , 2020, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[8]  D. Nathanson,et al.  Evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth width: A systematic review. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  A. Maharjan,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth in Relation to Golden Proportion, Red Proportion and Golden Percentage. , 2018, Journal of Nepal Health Research Council.

[10]  M. Alam,et al.  Maxillary and mandibular anterior crown width/height ratio and its relation to various arch perimeters, arch length, and arch width groups , 2015, European journal of dentistry.

[11]  V. Arora,et al.  Relating Central Incisor to Inner Canthal Distance - A Flexible Approach Adaptable to Different Population Groups , 2013 .

[12]  B. Bögözi,et al.  Aesthetic Principles of the Upper Front Teeth: Application of Golden Proportion (Levin) and Golden Percentage (Snow) , 2013 .

[13]  I. K. Ibrahim,et al.  Evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth and their relation to the golden proportion in malaysian population , 2013, BMC oral health.

[14]  A. Ellakwa,et al.  Quantifying the selection of maxillary anterior teeth using intraoral and extraoral anatomical landmarks. , 2011, The journal of contemporary dental practice.

[15]  Avinash S. Bidra,et al.  The relationship of facial anatomic landmarks with midlines of the face and mouth. , 2009, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  Daniel H Ward,et al.  Using the RED proportion to engineer the perfect smile. , 2008, Dentistry today.

[17]  D. H. Ward A study of dentists' preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions. , 2007, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[18]  F. M. Varjão,et al.  Nasal width as a guide for the selection of maxillary complete denture anterior teeth in four racial groups , 2006, BDJ.

[19]  C. J. do Prado,et al.  Correlation between facial measurements and the mesiodistal width of the maxillary anterior teeth. , 2006, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[20]  D. H. Ward Proportional smile design using the recurring esthetic dental (red) proportion. , 2001, Dental clinics of North America.

[21]  S. R. Snow,et al.  Esthetic smile analysis of maxillary anterior tooth width: the golden percentage. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[22]  J. Preston The golden proportion revisited. , 1993, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[23]  E I Levin,et al.  Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. , 1978, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  B. E. Kern Anthropometric parameters of tooth selection. , 1967, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  Md Hossain,et al.  Validity of mathematical proportions in maxillary anterior teeth among Bangladeshi population , 2017 .

[26]  L. E. Ballesteros,et al.  Mestizo Anterior Teeth's Proportions Proporciones de los Dientes Anteriores en una Población Mestiza , 2016 .

[27]  A. Correia,et al.  Anthropometric analysis of anterior maxillary teeth with digital photography - a study in a Portuguese sample. , 2014, The international journal of esthetic dentistry.

[28]  Muhammad Abbas,et al.  EVALUATION OF RECURRING ESTHETIC DENTAL PROPORTION IN NATURAL SMILE OF PAKISTANI SAMPLE , 2014 .

[29]  Indian Journal,et al.  Biometric Relationship Between Inner Canthal Distance And Geometric Progression For The Prediction Of Maxillary Central Incisor Width. , 2013 .

[30]  S. Singh,et al.  Comparative evaluation of facial landmarks and their correlation in the natural teeth of North Indian and northeast Indian people -A cohort study , 2012 .

[31]  J. Strub,et al.  Is the smile line a valid parameter for esthetic evaluation? A systematic literature review. , 2011, The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry.