A Learning Driven Model for ERP Software Selection Based on the Choquet Integral: Small and Medium Enterprises Context

Historically, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems were initially destined to large companies in order to standardize and streamline their key business processes. Recently, they have been increasingly adopted by Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). However, making strategic tradeoffs among the various marketplace solutions is a troublesome balance task for SMEs without the rescue of systematic decision approaches. This paper addresses the question of how to choose an ERP solution that best suits a given SME. It serves twofold objectives; firstly it defines a set of selection criteria related to SMEs’ context. Secondly, it presents a selection methodology based on the construction of an induced decision model through capturing the decision maker’s preferences. The key contribution of this paper is the introduction of a new iterative learning based approach destined to make enlightened decisions through the consideration of interdependencies among the adopted selection criteria thanks to the Choquet integral.

[1]  G. Choquet Theory of capacities , 1954 .

[2]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[3]  C. B. E. Costa,et al.  A Theoretical Framework for Measuring Attractiveness by a Categorical Based Evaluation Technique (MACBETH) , 1997 .

[4]  B. S. Sahay,et al.  Development of software selection criteria for supply chain solutions , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[5]  Jacques Verville,et al.  A SIX-STAGE MODEL OF THE BUYING PROCESS FOR ERP SOFTWARE , 2003 .

[6]  Frédéric Adam,et al.  Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: ERP Projects: Good or Bad for SMEs? , 2003 .

[7]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Relative importance of evaluation criteria for enterprise systems: a conjoint study , 2006, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Stefan Koch,et al.  ERP selection process in midsize and large organizations , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[9]  Ceyda Güngör Sen,et al.  A Literature Review and Classification of Enterprise Software Selection Approaches , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[10]  Michel Grabisch The Choquet integral as a linear interpolator , 2004 .

[11]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Analyzing alternatives in reverse logistics for end-of-life computers: ANP and balanced scorecard approach , 2005, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[12]  Subrata Chakraborty,et al.  A simulation based comparative study of normalization procedures in multiattribute decision making , 2007 .

[13]  Johann Mitlöhner,et al.  Characteristics of the Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methodology in Enterprise Resource Planning Software Decisions , 2015, Communications of the IIMA.

[14]  Axel Winkelmann,et al.  Experiences While Selecting, Adapting and Implementing ERP Systems in SMEs: A Case Study , 2008, AMCIS.

[15]  Yi-Chung Hu,et al.  Backpropagation multi-layer perceptron for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in analytic hierarchy process , 2006, Appl. Math. Comput..

[16]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  ERP and application integration: Exploratory survey , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[17]  菅野 道夫,et al.  Theory of fuzzy integrals and its applications , 1975 .

[18]  M. H. Small,et al.  Implementing enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems in small and midsize manufacturing firms , 2003 .

[19]  Satoshi Matsuda A Neural Network Model for the Decision-Making Process Based on ANP , 2006, The 2006 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network Proceedings.

[20]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Factors used in the selection of packaged software in small businesses: Views of owners and managers , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[21]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Non-additive robust ordinal regression: A multiple criteria decision model based on the Choquet integral , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Christophe Labreuche,et al.  The Choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multicriteria decision making , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[23]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems: Implementing for Effectiveness , 2003 .

[24]  A. J. Van Rensburg,et al.  Enterprise resource planning solution selection criteria in mediumsized South African companies , 2012 .

[25]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection , 2005 .

[26]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  A review of methods for capacity identification in Choquet integral based multi-attribute utility theory: Applications of the Kappalab R package , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An intelligent approach to ERP software selection through fuzzy ANP , 2007 .

[28]  R. E. Chalmers,et al.  SMALL MANUFACTURERS SEEK BEST ERP FIT , 1999 .

[29]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Making IT Count: Strategy, Delivery, Infrastructure , 2002 .

[30]  Birdoğan Baki,et al.  Determining the ERP package-selecting criteria: The case of Turkish manufacturing companies , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[31]  J. Siskos Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making , 1982 .

[32]  Peter B. Seddon,et al.  Assessing and managing the benefits of enterprise systems: the business manager's perspective , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[33]  Axel Winkelmann,et al.  Experiences while selecting and implementing ERP systems in SMEs: a case study , 2008 .