Social cognition and children's aggressive behavior.

DODGE, KENNETH A. Social Cognition and Children's Aggressive Behavior. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 51, 162-170. Aggressive and nonaggressive boys from grades 2, 4, and 6 were exposed to a frustrating negative outcome which was instigated by an unknown peer who had acted with either a hostile intent, a benign intent, or an ambiguous intent. Videotaped behavioral responses constituted the dependent measures. Contrary to a hypothesis, aggressive boys did not display any failure to integrate intent cues into their behavioral reactions to the negative consequences, nor were there any significant main or interaction effects for age of subject. All groups responded with more aggression in the hostile condition than in the benign condition. Aggressive and nonaggressive subjects differed only in the ambiguous condition. Here aggressive subjects responded as if the peer had acted with a hostile intent. Nonaggressive subjects responded as if the peer had acted with a benign intent. The hypothesis that aggressive children respond to ambiguous-intention-negative-consequence situations with aggression because they infer a hostile intention was supported by a follow-up study using hypothetical episodes as stimuli. Results of this second study reflect the increased significance of the social reputation of the aggressive child with increasing age. The total pattern of results suggests a picture of the aggressive child being caught up in a spiraling cycle of reputation and behavior.

[1]  G. H. Lunney,et al.  USING ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE WITH A DICHOTOMOUS DEPENDENT VARIABLE: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 1970 .

[2]  D. W. Shantz,et al.  Situational effects on retaliatory aggression at three age levels. , 1973, Child development.

[3]  F. Heider PERCEIVING THE OTHER PERSON , 1958 .

[4]  M. Zanna,et al.  Intentions and Their Contexts in the Moral Judgments of Children and Adults. , 1978 .

[5]  N. Pastore The role of arbitrariness in the frustration-aggression hypothesis. , 1952, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[6]  B. G. Rule 6. The hostile and instrumental functions of human aggression , 1978 .

[7]  G. S. Lesser The relationships between various forms of aggression and popularity among lower-class children. , 1959 .

[8]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Children's Reactions to Information about the Intentions Underlying an Aggressive Act , 1974 .

[9]  E. Burnstein,et al.  Arbitrariness of frustration and its consequences for aggression in a social situation. , 1962, Journal of personality.

[10]  T. J. Berndt The Effect of Reciprocity Norms on Moral Judgment and Causal Attribution. , 1977 .

[11]  John D. Campbell,et al.  Perceptual and Behavioral Correlates of Social Effectiveness , 1961 .

[12]  M. Schoen The Moral Judgment of the Child. , 1933 .

[13]  P. Mussen,et al.  Carmichael's Manual of Child Psychology , 1972 .

[14]  B. Mccandless,et al.  A study of catharsis of aggression. , 1966 .

[15]  H. Murray The Effect of Fear upon Estimates of the Maliciousness of other Personalities , 1933 .

[16]  W. Hartup,et al.  Determinants and origins of aggressive behavior , 1974 .

[17]  H. Gerard,et al.  Attributed intentions and informational selectivity , 1974 .

[18]  M. Snyder On the Self-Fulfilling Nature of Social Stereotypes. , 1977 .

[19]  R. Tagiuri,et al.  Person perception and interpersonal behavior , 1959 .

[20]  W. Hartup Aggression in childhood. Developmental perspectives. , 1974, The American psychologist.