Perceptual organization of sequential stimuli in listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

The perceptual organization of sequential stimuli presumably depends in part on the fidelity with which acoustic cues are encoded in the auditory system. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of cochlear hearing loss on two measures of sequential processing that rely on spectro-temporal information. The results of a gap detection/discrimination task indicated that listeners with cochlear hearing loss exhibited particular difficulty discriminating gaps between tonal markers that were disparate in frequency. Performance improved when the disparate tones were embedded into a sequence of alternating low- and high-frequency tones that may have facilitated the perceptual of the stimuli into separate auditory streams. However, performance for listeners with cochlear hearing loss was generally poorer than that of normal-hearing listeners and did not appear to be related to threshold in quiet or to frequency selectivity. The results of a melody recognition task that required a target melody to be "heard out" from simultaneous competing melodies also indicated generally poorer performance on the part of the listeners with hearing loss, although the pattern of results across all listeners was highly idiosyncratic. It was concluded that cochlear hearing loss deleteriously affects the processes underlying perceptual organization of sequential stimuli. In particular, perceptual organization in the presence of cochlear hearing loss appears to require a greater frequency separation between presumed auditory streams in comparison to normal-hearing listeners.

[1]  M P Haggard,et al.  Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J H Grose,et al.  Signal detection in complex comodulated backgrounds by normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  B C Moore,et al.  Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  I J Hirsh,et al.  Some figural properties of auditory patterns. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  C. Collyer,et al.  The detection of a temporal gap between two disparate stimuli , 1974 .

[6]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Kinney,et al.  Discrimination in auditory and visual patterns. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[8]  R. Plomp,et al.  The effect of competing melodies on melody recognition by hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J H Grose,et al.  Gap detection as a function of stimulus bandwidth with fixed high-frequency cutoff in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Pierre L. Divenyi,et al.  Discrimination of time intervals marked by brief acoustic pulses of various intensities and spectra , 1977 .

[11]  C. Formby,et al.  Modulation threshold functions for chronically impaired Menière patients. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[12]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Walt Jesteadt,et al.  The relation between gap discrimination and auditory stream segregation , 1982 .

[14]  K H Arehart Effects of harmonic content on complex-tone fundamental-frequency discrimination in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The Trill Threshold , 1950 .

[16]  J H Grose,et al.  Spectrotemporal analysis and cochlear hearing impairment: effects of frequency selectivity, temporal resolution, signal frequency, and rate of modulation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  B C Moore,et al.  Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: effects of frequency and level. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Detection of temporal gaps within and between perceptual tonal groups , 1974 .

[19]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of spectral envelope smearing on speech reception. II. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Age effects on duration discrimination with simple and complex stimuli. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  M F Dorman,et al.  Minimum spectral contrast for vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  B C Moore Temporal Analysis in Normal and Impaired Hearing , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Patterson Auditory filter shapes derived with noise stimuli. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M R Leek,et al.  The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  R. Lutfi,et al.  Spectral weights for overall level discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  W. Jesteadt,et al.  Speech perception in low-pass filtered noise for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[27]  C. DeFilippo,et al.  Detection of a temporal gap in low-frequency narrow-band signals by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  S J Norton,et al.  "Say-stay" identification and psychoacoustic performance of hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Notched-noise measures of frequency selectivity in adults and children using fixed-masker-level and fixed-signal-level presentation. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[30]  T R Letowski,et al.  Vowel confusions of hearing-impaired listeners under reverberant and nonreverberant conditions. , 1985, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[31]  Q Summerfield,et al.  Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  D. Perrott,et al.  Auditory temporal resolution: Gap detection as a function of interpulse frequency disparity , 1971 .

[33]  A. Bregman,et al.  Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Effects of envelope fluctuations on gap detection , 1992, Hearing Research.

[35]  N. Viemeister,et al.  Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[36]  B C Moore,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on the intelligibility of sentences in the presence of interfering speech. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Vowel errors in noise and in reverberation by hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.