Towards a criterion for evaluating the quality of 3D reconstructions

Even though numerous algorithms exist for estimating the structure of a scene from its video, the solutions obtained are often of unacceptable quality. To overcome some of the deficiencies, many application systems rely on processing more information than necessary with the hope that the redundancy will help improve the quality. This raises the question about how the accuracy of the solution is related to the amount of information processed by the algorithm. Can we define the accuracy of the solution precisely enough that we automatically recognize situations where the quality of the data is so bad that even a large number of additional observations will not yield the desired solution? This paper proposes an information theoretic criterion for evaluating the quality of a 3D reconstruction in terms of the statistics of the observed parameters (i.e. the image correspondences). The accuracy of the reconstruction is judged by considering the change in mutual information (or equivalently the conditional differential entropy) between a scene and its reconstructions and its effectiveness is shown through simulations.

[1]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Optimal Motion and Structure Estimation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  c ○ 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Linear Differential Algorithm for Motion Recovery: A Geometric Approach , 2022 .

[3]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Inherent Ambiguities in Recovering 3-D Motion from a Noisy Flow Field , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  John Oliensis,et al.  A Critique of Structure-from-Motion Algorithms , 2000, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[5]  O. Faugeras Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint , 1993 .

[6]  Zhengyou Zhang,et al.  Determining the Epipolar Geometry and its Uncertainty: A Review , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[7]  J. G. Gander,et al.  An introduction to signal detection and estimation , 1990 .

[8]  Bin Yu,et al.  Model Selection and the Principle of Minimum Description Length , 2001 .

[9]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An introduction to signal detection and estimation (2nd ed.) , 1994 .

[10]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[11]  Narendra Ahuja,et al.  Optimal motion and structure estimation , 1989, Proceedings CVPR '89: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Robust estimation of depth and motion using stochastic approximation , 2001, Proceedings 2001 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.01CH37205).

[13]  A. Murat Tekalp,et al.  Error Characterization of the Factorization Method , 2001, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[14]  Kenichi Kanatani,et al.  Geometric Information Criterion for Model Selection , 1998, International Journal of Computer Vision.