Friends, not foes?: Work design and formalization in the modern work context

Scholars have long debated the advantages and disadvantages of formalization. Although many researchers have suggested that formalization is likely to be disadvantageous in the dynamic environments currently faced by organizations and employees, formalization appears to be increasingly pervasive in modern organizations. Since scholars have suggested that the effects of formalization may depend on the way it is implemented, I examine work design as a key contingency for the successful implementation of formalization. Based on examination and integration of work design, organizational theory, and cognitive perspectives, I conclude that formalization is actually more advantageous and viable in the current work context. However, neither work design nor formalization individually is sufficient for organizations seeking to cope with current challenges. Rather, both interact and thus represent key levers for organizations seeking to thrive in the modern work context. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[2]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[3]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[4]  W. Sine,et al.  Revisiting Burns And Stalker: Formal Structure And New Venture Performance In Emerging Economic Sectors , 2006 .

[5]  S. Parker,et al.  Enhancing role breadth self-efficacy: the roles of job enrichment and other organizational interventions. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  J. Edwards,et al.  The nature and outcomes of work: a replication and extension of interdisciplinary work-design research. , 2000 .

[7]  Donald G. Gardner,et al.  Activation Theory and Task Design: An Empirical Test of Several New Predictions , 1986 .

[8]  J. Hackman,et al.  Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues , 1995 .

[9]  T. Chartrand,et al.  THE UNBEARABLE AUTOMATICITY OF BEING , 1999 .

[10]  Erik Dane,et al.  Exploring Intuition and its Role in Managerial Decision Making , 2007 .

[11]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  William D. Todor,et al.  Effects of Organizational Formalization on Alienation Among Professionals and Nonprofessionals , 1986 .

[13]  Y. Fried,et al.  Location, location, location: contextualizing organizational research* , 2001 .

[14]  Jean E. Wallace Organizational and Professional Commitment in Professional and Nonprofessional Organizations , 1995 .

[15]  D. Zapf,et al.  Customer-related social stressors and burnout. , 2004, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[16]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  9 The Case for Behavioral Decision Research in Organizational Behavior , 2008 .

[17]  Gary P. Pisano,et al.  Organizational Differences in Rates of Learning: Evidence from the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Forrest Briscoe,et al.  From Iron Cage to Iron Shield? How Bureaucracy Enables Temporal Flexibility for Professional Service Workers , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[19]  Lisa M. Schwartz,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST Helping Doctors and Patients Make Sense of Health Statistics , 2022 .

[20]  Fabrizio Ferraro,et al.  Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling , 2003 .

[21]  G. R. Oldham,et al.  Employee Creativity: Personal and Contextual Factors at Work , 1996 .

[22]  H. Greve,et al.  Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge Combination and Experience in Innovative Teams , 2006 .

[23]  P. Adler The Evolving Object of Software Development , 2005 .

[24]  P. Adler Building better bureaucracies , 1999 .

[25]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[26]  E. Lawler Total Quality Management and employee involvement: Are they compatible? , 1994 .

[27]  S. Barley,et al.  Bringing Work Back In , 2001 .

[28]  L. Ross,et al.  Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[29]  Elizabeth A McGlynn,et al.  The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  D. Rousseau Characteristics of Departments, Positions, and Individuals: Contexts for Attitudes and Behavior. , 1978 .

[31]  D. Hofmann,et al.  Leadership, collective personality, and performance. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Carol T. Kulik,et al.  Old Friends, New Faces: Motivation Research in the 1990s , 1999 .

[33]  G. Johns The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[34]  Gary D. Kissler The new employment contract , 1994 .

[35]  S. Parker Longitudinal effects of lean production on employee outcomes and the mediating role of work characteristics. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[36]  Eric D. Darr,et al.  The Acquisition, Transfer, and Depreciation of Knowledge in Service Organizations: Productivity in Franchises , 1995 .

[37]  D. Fay,et al.  Rethinking the effects of stressors: a longitudinal study on personal initiative. , 2002, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[38]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[39]  Jia Lin Xie,et al.  Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high? , 1995 .

[40]  S. Iyengar,et al.  Managers' theories of subordinates: A cross-cultural examination of manager perceptions of motivation and appraisal of performance , 2004 .

[41]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors , 2006 .

[42]  D. Rousseau Standing out in the fields of organization science , 2007 .

[43]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Building an innovation factory. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[44]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Enhancing Creativity Through "Mindless" Work: A Framework of Workday Design , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[45]  K. Roberts Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization , 1990 .

[46]  V. A. Thompson Bureaucracy and innovation , 1969 .

[47]  Donald F. Roy “Banana Time” Job Satisfaction and Informal Interaction , 1959 .

[48]  J. Mathieu,et al.  The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[49]  S. Sitkin,et al.  Big‐B versus Big‐O: what is organizational about organizational behavior?* , 2001 .

[50]  J. George 9 Creativity in Organizations , 2007 .

[51]  K. Klein,et al.  The Challenge of Innovation Implementation , 1996 .

[52]  Jitendra V. Singh Performance, Slack, and Risk Taking in Organizational Decision Making , 1986 .

[53]  M. Feldman Organizational Routines as a Source of Continuous Change , 2000 .

[54]  R. Dawes A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. , 1971 .

[55]  M. A. Campion,et al.  Neglected questions in job design: How people design jobs, task-job predictability, and influence of training , 1991 .

[56]  Carolyn Axtell,et al.  SEEING ANOTHER VIEWPOINT: ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES OF EMPLOYEE PERSPECTIVE TAKING , 2001 .

[57]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Creative Expertise as Superior Reproducible Performance: Innovative and Flexible Aspects of Expert Performance , 1999 .

[58]  Steffen Raub,et al.  Does bureaucracy kill individual initiative? The impact of structure on organizational citizenship behavior in the hospitality industry , 2008 .

[59]  R. Daft,et al.  Across the Great Divide: Knowledge Creation and Transfer Between Practitioners and Academics , 2001 .

[60]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Creativity under the gun. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[61]  Cornelius J. König,et al.  Integrating Theories of Motivation , 2006 .

[62]  T. Davenport,et al.  Reverse Engineering : Google's Innovation Machine , 2008 .

[63]  Michael A. Campion,et al.  MINIMIZING TRADEOFFS WHEN REDESIGNING WORK: EVIDENCE FROM A LONGITUDINAL QUASI‐EXPERIMENT , 2002 .

[64]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[65]  Charles N. Greene,et al.  The Effects of Formalization on Professional Involvement: A Compensatory Process Approach. , 1981 .

[66]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[67]  Kenneth R. Brousseau,et al.  Toward a Dynamic Model of Job-Person Relationships: Findings, Research Questions, and Implications for Work System Design , 1983 .

[68]  S. Taggar Individual Creativity and Group Ability to Utilize Individual Creative Resources: A Multilevel Model , 2002 .

[69]  L. Perlow The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[70]  L. Ross The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process1 , 1977 .

[71]  J. Suls,et al.  Flawed Self-Assessment , 2004, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[72]  E. McGlynn,et al.  The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  Lynn Crawford,et al.  Developing Organizational Project Management Capability: Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[74]  J. Hackman,et al.  Relationships between organization structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks , 1981 .

[75]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[76]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Organizational Routines as a Unit of Analysis , 2005 .

[77]  S. Ghoshal Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices , 2005 .

[78]  Neil Anderson,et al.  A Dialectic Perspective on Innovation: Conflicting Demands, Multiple Pathways, and Ambidexterity , 2009, Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

[79]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[80]  E. Jaques,et al.  In praise of hierarchy. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[81]  P. Adler,et al.  Flexibility Versus Efficiency? a Case Study of Model Changeovers in the Toyota Production System , 1999 .

[82]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[83]  Michael F. O'Connor,et al.  Discovering Healthcare Cognition: The Use of Cognitive Artifacts to Reveal Cognitive Work , 2006 .

[84]  Adam M. Grant,et al.  7 Redesigning Work Design Theories: The Rise of Relational and Proactive Perspectives , 2009 .

[85]  Sydney Finkelstein,et al.  Executive Job Demands: New Insights for Explaining Strategic Decisions and Leader Behaviors , 2005 .

[86]  Alan J. Dubinsky,et al.  Influence of formalization on the organizational commitment and work alienation of salespeople and industrial buyers. , 1988 .

[87]  B. Schwartz Self-determination. The tyranny of freedom. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[88]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Evidence-based management. , 2006, Harvard business review.

[89]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace , 1993 .

[90]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[91]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Crossing an Apparent Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[92]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  The Incident Command System : High Reliability Organizing for Complex and Volatile Task , 2007 .

[93]  Fariborz Damanpour,et al.  The Adoption of Technological, Administrative, and Ancillary Innovations: Impact of Organizational Factors , 1987 .

[94]  Christopher K. Hsee Elastic Justification: How Unjustifiable Factors Influence Judgments , 1996 .

[95]  J. March Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[96]  G. Hodgkinson,et al.  Cognition in organizations. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[97]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[98]  H. Simon Bounded Rationality and Organizational Learning , 1991 .

[99]  H. Simon,et al.  Rational choice and the structure of the environment. , 1956, Psychological review.

[100]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  How Can Decision Making Be Improved? , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[101]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making , 2000 .

[102]  David Knoke,et al.  Measuring Organizational Structures and Environments , 1994 .

[103]  Tracing the Path of Research in Organizations and Work , 2006 .

[104]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[105]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[106]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[107]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[108]  J. George,et al.  Work Interrupted: A Closer Look at the Role of Interruptions in Organizational Life , 2003 .

[109]  Michael E. Porter Las cinco fuerzas competitivas que le dan forma a la estrategia , 2008 .

[110]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[111]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[112]  Claus W. Langfred The Downside of Self-Management: A Longitudinal Study of the Effects tf Conflict on Trust, Autonomy, and Task Interdependence in Self-Managing Teams , 2007 .

[113]  P. Tetlock Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. , 1985 .

[114]  S. Parker,et al.  A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts , 2007 .

[115]  Kathleen M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Special Issue: Frontiers of Organization Science, Part 1 of 2: Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[116]  H. Aarts,et al.  Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior , 2000 .

[117]  Daniel Stewart Social Status in an Open-Source Community , 2005 .

[118]  P. Todd,et al.  Environments That Make Us Smart , 2007 .

[119]  S. Parker,et al.  Future work design research and practice: Towards an elaborated model of work design , 2001 .

[120]  Elizabeth George,et al.  2 Old Assumptions, New Work: The Opportunities and Challenges of Research on Nonstandard Employment , 2007 .

[121]  Denise M. Rousseau,et al.  Is there Such a thing as “Evidence-Based Management”? , 2006 .