Magnetic Field Proximity Detection and Alert Technology for Safe Heavy Construction Equipment Operation

Approximately 17% of the 721 fatalities in the US in 2011 resulted from workers colliding with objects or equipment in the work environment. Construction site conditions often create hazardous proximity situations by requiring workers-on-foot and heavy equipment to be in close proximity. Current safety management, incl. industry safety best practices, to protect construction workers-on-foot have proven inadequate. This article evaluates the reliability and effectiveness of magnetic field sensing and actuation technology that brings final change to this problem. Introduced are the design and characteristics of novel magnetic field proximity detection and alert technology that alerts workers-on-foot from being too close to equipment in real-time. Field-realistic experimental trials highlight successful tests to various possible interaction scenarios. Results indicate that the developed magnetic field proximity detection and alert technology provides reliable and accurate warnings or alerts to equipment operators and workers-on-foot at pre-calibrated distances, and even can slow or shut down the equipment if the hazardous situation remains in effect. Technology and experimental knowledge further suggest workers-on-foot and construction equipment operators can be provided with an additional layer of protection by receiving advanced safety education and training from the analysis of near-miss data that is geo-referenced to the construction site layout.

[1]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Automated Collection, Identification, Localization, and Analysis of Worker-Related Proximity Hazard Events in Heavy Construction Equipment Operation , 2015 .

[2]  Eric Marks,et al.  Method for testing proximity detection and alert technology for safe construction equipment operation , 2013 .

[3]  Sherif Ali Mohtady Mohamed,et al.  SAFETY CLIMATE IN CONSTRUCTION SITE ENVIRONMENTS , 2002 .

[4]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Cell-based construction site simulation model for earthmoving operations using real-time equipment location data , 2015 .

[5]  Yang Miang Goh,et al.  Incident Causation Model for Improving Feedback of Safety Knowledge , 2004 .

[6]  Tore J Larsson,et al.  INDUSTRIAL FORKLIFT TRUCKS - DYNAMIC STABILITY AND THE DESIGN OF SAFE LOGISTICS , 2003 .

[7]  Tariq S. Abdelhamid,et al.  Identifying Root Causes of Construction Accidents , 2001 .

[8]  Stephanie G. Pratt,et al.  BUILDING SAFER HIGHWAY WORK ZONES: MEASURES TO PREVENT WORKER INJURIES FROM VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT , 2001 .

[9]  Dalma Novak,et al.  Optical crosstalk in fiber-radio WDM networks , 2001 .

[10]  J. Teizer,et al.  Quadrature Amplitude Modulated Backscatter in Passive and Semipassive UHF RFID Systems , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[11]  Carlos H. Caldas,et al.  Human-Assisted Obstacle Avoidance System using 3D Workspace Modeling for Construction Equipment Operation , 2006 .

[12]  Matthew R. Hallowell,et al.  Application of Sensing Technology to Safety Management , 2010 .

[13]  Jacob Carr,et al.  A shell-based magnetic field model for magnetic proximity detection systems , 2012 .

[14]  Jochen Teizer.  Wearable, wireless identification sensing platform: Self-Monitoring Alert and Reporting Technology for Hazard Avoidance and Training (SmartHat) , 2015, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[15]  Carlos H. Caldas,et al.  Evaluation of sensing technology for the prevention of backover accidents in construction work zones , 2014, J. Inf. Technol. Constr..

[16]  Todd Ruff,et al.  Evaluation of a radar-based proximity warning system for off-highway dump trucks. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[17]  Christopher C. Jobes,et al.  Development of a method to determine operator location using electromagnetic proximity detection , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Workshop on Robotic and Sensors Environments.

[18]  Osama Abudayyeh,et al.  An investigation of management’s commitment to construction safety , 2006 .

[19]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Computing 3D blind spots of construction equipment: Implementation and evaluation of an automated measurement and visualization method utilizing range point cloud data , 2013 .

[20]  Manu Venugopal,et al.  Ultrawideband for Automated Real-Time Three-Dimensional Location Sensing for Workforce, Equipment, and Material Positioning and Tracking , 2008 .

[21]  W. H. Schiffbauer,et al.  Active proximity warning system for surface and underground mining applications , 2002 .

[22]  T. M. Ruff,et al.  Recommendations for evaluating and implementing proximity warning systems onsurface mining equipment , 2007 .

[23]  M. Caruso,et al.  A New Perspective on Magnetic Field Sensing , 1999 .

[24]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Global Positioning System Data to Model and Visualize Workspace Density in Construction Safety Planning , 2015 .

[25]  Jochen Teizer,et al.  Visibility-related fatalities related to construction equipment , 2011 .

[26]  Paul M. Goodrum,et al.  The application of active radio frequency identification technology for tool tracking on construction job sites , 2006 .

[27]  A. Lázaro,et al.  Radio Link Budgets for UHF RFID on Multipath Environments , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[28]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  Autonomous pro-active real-time construction worker and equipment operator proximity safety alert system , 2010 .

[29]  A. Roy Duff,et al.  Development of Causal Model of Construction Accident Causation , 2001 .

[30]  Carlos H. Caldas,et al.  Real-Time Three-Dimensional Occupancy Grid Modeling for the Detection and Tracking of Construction Resources , 2007 .