Acoustic signal typing for evaluation of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech.

SUMMARY Because of the aperiodicity of many tracheoesophageal voices, acoustic analysis of the tracheoesophageal voice is less straightforward than that of the normal voice. This study presents the development and testing of an acoustic signal typing system based on visual inspection of a narrow-band spectrogram that can be used by researchers for classification of voice quality in tracheoesophageal speech. In addition to this classification system, a selection of acoustic measures [median fundamental frequency, standard deviation of fundamental frequency, jitter, percentage of voiced (%Voiced), harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR), glottal-to-noise excitation (GNE) ratio, and band energy difference (BED)] was computed to provide more insight into the acoustic components of tracheoesophageal voice quality. For clinical relevance, relationships between the acoustic signal types and an overall judgment of the voice were investigated as well. Results showed that the four acoustic signal types form a good basis for performing more acoustic analyses and give a good impression of the overall quality of the voice.

[1]  F. Hilgers,et al.  Acoustical analysis and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal prosthetic voice. , 1998, Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation.

[2]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer , 2002 .

[3]  M. Singer,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal, and tracheoesophageal speech production. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[4]  B Weinberg,et al.  Aerodynamic and myoelastic contributions to tracheoesophageal voice production. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[5]  A. Staffieri,et al.  Spectrographic differences between tracheal-esophageal and esophageal voice. , 1996, Folia phoniatrica et logopaedica : official organ of the International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics.

[6]  Florien J Koopmans-van Beinum,et al.  Perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal speech by naive and experienced judges through the use of semantic differential scales. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[7]  N. Aaronson,et al.  Development and clinical evaluation of a second-generation voice prosthesis (Provox 2), designed for anterograde and retrograde insertion. , 1997, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[8]  J. Wouters,et al.  Acoustic analysis of tracheo-oesophageal versus oesophageal speech , 1994, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[9]  N Yanagihara,et al.  Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness. , 1967, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  M. Trudeau,et al.  Acoustic characteristics of female tracheoesophageal speech. , 1990, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[11]  Hans Werner Strube,et al.  Glottal-to-Noise Excitation Ratio - a New Measure for Describing Pathological Voices , 1997 .